Joshua Moon the owner of Kiwifarms
More like josh moo because of his cow status.
 
He hates those too and calls you a pedophile for having one.
Felt fitting to post this.
null1.pngnull2.png
 
Every groomer's biggest fantasy (besides child sex slaves, of course) is a groomer girlfriend to help them groom kids, so defending her isn't surprising for people like him.
 
So Null's utterly broken brain has led him into yet another embarrassing moment on MATI this friday. Someone in chat says "Rekieta has been defending Shadman lately" and Null just immediately believes the guy and goes into a rant and detailed history of all the CP shadman has drawn. In case you are wondering as far as Rekieta has fallen he is not defending Shadman.

At 2:07:30 in the below video
 
Last edited:
So Null's utterly broken brain has led him into yet another embarrassing moment on MATI this friday. Someone in chat says "Rekieta has been defending Shadman lately" and Null just immediately believes the guy and goes into a rant and detailed history of all the CP shadman has drawn. In case you are wondering as far as Rekieta has fallen he is not defending Shadman.

At 2:07:30 in the below video
Wait until null realizes creeps that like shadman use his site and have obvious accounts like "shadfan(insert number)" or use his cropped art as avatars.
 
So Null's utterly broken brain has led him into yet another embarrassing moment on MATI this friday. Someone in chat says "Rekieta has been defending Shadman lately" and Null just immediately believes the guy and goes into a rant and detailed history of all the CP shadman has drawn. In case you are wondering as far as Rekieta has fallen he is not defending Shadman.

At 2:07:30 in the below video
I'm too lazy to find any statement made by Nick that could even remotely be related to Shadman; but it's kind of funny from the abstract.

>Nick tells Null people can create narratives based on little evidence
>That they will start to come up with insane conclusions based on half-truths, and eventual lies, because at a certain point people will want to believe whatever narrative they come up with because they want to believe it
>Null tells Nick he doesn't understand and starts to get upset at Nick, all but saying that isn't true
>Someone proceeds to prove Nick right

lol, lmao even
 
Last edited:
I'm too lazy to find any statement made by Nick that could even remotely be related to Shadman; but it's kind of funny from the abstract.
An account in the Rekieta thread pointed out the confusion. Rekieta's friend Drexel has a friend named Shad and being that KF is full of weird degens they assumed it was shadman.
shad.png
I do not imagine that he is too mad at all because if Rekieta can handle this right he can prove everything he said he had a problem with Null over is true. This is a slam dunk for Rekieta even if he still is being a lolcow. He was vindicated live about Null believing whatever manipulative bullshit that comes his way.
 
I do not imagine that he is too mad at all because if Rekieta can handle this right he can prove everything he said he had a problem with Null over is true. This is a slam dunk for Rekieta even if he still is being a lolcow. He was vindicated live about Null believing whatever manipulative bullshit that comes his way.
Never under estimate a person's ability to snatch defeat from the jaws of victory.
 
Back
Top Bottom