Which you imply is wrong, thus you're, indeed, "complaining about his ethics" and thus "moralfagging".
would be funny if it leads to this place being a pro-trans version of kiwifarms. "we record internet drama, unless the person doesn't want it and is part of a minority, Yaniv has never done anything wrong"
Sure thing I'll do that, and you keep proving you have no reading comprehension.
"What makes your site different?"
Holy shit you're really fucking dumb.Sure thing I'll do that, and you keep proving you have no reading comprehension.
And here since you struggle to understand what moralfagging even is.
moralfag - Wiktionary, the free dictionary
en.wiktionary.org
"What makes your site different?"
"We're openly gay."
Oh you understand the word? Why did you put it in quotes then? I was concerned for you so I gave you the definition.Holy shit you're really fucking dumb.
Even according to your own definition: "A person who expresses moral disapproval or moral opinions" YOU'RE EXPRESSING MORAL DISAPPROVAL OR MORAL OPINIONS ABOUT JOSH'S INCONSISTENCY YOU ABSOLUTE MORON
"especially in a generally amoral setting like the /b/ board on the 4chan community." or like a forum dedicated to stalking internet eccentrics? We're not the Effective Altruism forums here or whatever the fuck your definition of morality is.
that'd be accurate, cope
You're really thick
Oh my
Is every post of yours criticizing someone a moral judgement?You're really thick
I put it in quotes because I don't agree with its use, moron, like "personal army" and all the other r/4chan words you like to use as an imageboard-brained "oldfag"
Are you seriously so fucking dumb that you can't see how this is a moral judgement of Josh?
I'm not running, I'm trying to not derail the thread completely.
Huh? Yes. Are you this fucking dumb?
Now, that's fucking cringe.
I think he would be too afraid to be in the same room with that much steroid and beef testosterone fueled raw masculinity and joe would probably have a more interesting interview with a chimpanzee anyway. If joe pressed him on anything he would back down and would be too afraid to say anything if he did manage it. I doubt joe would want to touch the poop anyway though but he has done interviews with Alex Jones so it's not entirely out of the question either.WAIT WAIT, DOES JOSH REALLY THINK HE HAS ANY CHANCE TO GO INTO ROGAN?!
It would be an accurate observation of history and objectively correct conclusion to come to regardless of him being a sperg.
Literal projection.
The main issue of course is that socialists aren't going to say: "Yeah, we're authoritarian."
National socialism communism socialism and fascism are all left wing and authoritarian firstly. There can be right and left wing authoritarianism it isn't just limited to one side like monarchy being right wing but are still not much different than modern dictators besides their looks. Left and right is pretty much mostly economic collective or individualism and specific ideologies such as those fall into one or the other. Secondly you're reading too much into it and capitalist isn't on there either so immediately jumping to your interpretation is pretty funny and quite telling. Like a rorschach test almost. If you look at the pattern these are all more of a government focus political identity not economic and those are all economic focused as opposed to legal focused. Not to mention libertarian and anarchist are in there as well. Depending on the status quo these could all mean different things. A Chinese conservative isn't the same and an American conservative as they have different values but both are conservative and these terms are relative. I would go as far to say as people are not any of these labels, their views are and people could have one view that is progressive and another that is conservative so are we really adding up points like it is a political alignment test? That's why it is easier for people to just say they are the side they like best even if they don't fit in.
How's that projection? Critising someone or pointing out a quality or value is a moral judgement by defitnion.
"Nazism and fascism are left-wing"
The one thing nazis fascists socialists and communists agree on is that they want to distance themselves from eachother. You couldn't even define what left and right is. Regardless of how you do it will be biased towards a side. You just outed yourself as one of them. Doesn't matter which one because they're all retarded and they are all different flavors of shit.How's that projection? Critising someone or pointing out a quality or value is a moral judgement by defitnion.
"Nazism and fascism are left-wing"
Now, this thread is such a festival of retards
Mr. Englehardt is a gentleman and a professional and would never reply in such a childish and vitriolic manner, thereby giving ammo to his enemies in exchange for asspats from his users.
I would have photoshopped dicks on one of her pictures and sent it in response as a tried and true classic.
