Null 🥝 Joshua Moon Megathread

[Kramer is A Man Da]

I am seriously thinking of this.

would be funny if it leads to this place being a pro-trans version of kiwifarms. "we record internet drama, unless the person doesn't want it and is part of a minority, Yaniv has never done anything wrong"

 

[BurnerAccount333]

Which you imply is wrong, thus you're, indeed, "complaining about his ethics" and thus "moralfagging".

Keep proving yourself to be an idiot.

Sure thing I'll do that, and you keep proving you have no reading comprehension.
And here since you struggle to understand what moralfagging even is.

moralfag - Wiktionary, the free dictionary

en.wiktionary.org

moralfag (plural moralfags)

1. (Internet slang, offensive, derogatory) A person who expresses moral disapproval or moral opinions, especially in a generally amoral setting like the /b/ board on the 4chan community.

would be funny if it leads to this place being a pro-trans version of kiwifarms. "we record internet drama, unless the person doesn't want it and is part of a minority, Yaniv has never done anything wrong"

"What makes your site different?"
"We're openly gay."

 

[Not enough minerals Not enough]

Sure thing I'll do that, and you keep proving you have no reading comprehension.
And here since you struggle to understand what moralfagging even is.

moralfag - Wiktionary, the free dictionary

en.wiktionary.org

"What makes your site different?"
"We're openly gay."

Holy shit you're really fucking dumb.
Even according to your own definition: "A person who expresses moral disapproval or moral opinions" YOU'RE EXPRESSING MORAL DISAPPROVAL OR MORAL OPINIONS ABOUT JOSH'S INCONSISTENCY YOU ABSOLUTE MORON
"especially in a generally amoral setting like the /b/ board on the 4chan community." or like a forum dedicated to stalking internet eccentrics? We're not the Effective Altruism forums here or whatever the fuck your definition of morality is.

 

[BurnerAccount333]

Holy shit you're really fucking dumb.
Even according to your own definition: "A person who expresses moral disapproval or moral opinions" YOU'RE EXPRESSING MORAL DISAPPROVAL OR MORAL OPINIONS ABOUT JOSH'S INCONSISTENCY YOU ABSOLUTE MORON
"especially in a generally amoral setting like the /b/ board on the 4chan community." or like a forum dedicated to stalking internet eccentrics? We're not the Effective Altruism forums here or whatever the fuck your definition of morality is.

Oh you understand the word? Why did you put it in quotes then? I was concerned for you so I gave you the definition.
Good job missing the point, man. Here I'm done dragging this out.

• I respond to "Josh isn't as principled as he wants you to believe"
• With: What makes you think that?
• I add examples of him, Josh, being unprincipled.
• I add the context that his beliefs change with the crowd that acts like they're saving the west by shitposting.
  • "likely just a moral shift to avoid dealing with the moralfags he now surrounds himself daily with?"

Wow. Really hard to understand that point. Incredibly complicated.
Anyways have a great day.

 

[VAIDS Victim]

Does he consider communist and socialist authoritarian? What a sperg.

 

[Not enough minerals Not enough]

View attachment 39009
Does he consider communist and socialist authoritarian? What a sperg.

that'd be accurate, cope

 

[Not enough minerals Not enough]

Oh you understand the word? Why did you put it in quotes then? I was concerned for you so I gave you the definition.
Good job missing the point, man. Here I'm done dragging this out.

• I respond to "Josh isn't as principled as he wants you to believe"
• With: What makes you think that?
• I add examples of him, Josh, being unprincipled.
• I add the context that his beliefs change with the crowd that acts like they're saving the west by shitposting.
  • "likely just a moral shift to avoid dealing with the moralfags he now surrounds himself daily with?"

Wow. Really hard to understand that point. Incredibly complicated.
Anyways have a great day.

You're really thick
I put it in quotes because I don't agree with its use, moron, like "personal army" and all the other r/4chan words you like to use as an imageboard-brained "oldfag"
Are you seriously so fucking dumb that you can't see how this is a moral judgement of Josh?

• I respond to "Josh isn't as principled as he wants you to believe"
• With: What makes you think that?
• I add examples of him, Josh, being unprincipled.
• I add the context that his beliefs change with the crowd that acts like they're saving the west by shitposting.
  • "likely just a moral shift to avoid dealing with the moralfags he now surrounds himself daily with?"

Oh my

Sure, run away.

 

[BurnerAccount333]

You're really thick
I put it in quotes because I don't agree with its use, moron, like "personal army" and all the other r/4chan words you like to use as an imageboard-brained "oldfag"
Are you seriously so fucking dumb that you can't see how this is a moral judgement of Josh?

Is every post of yours criticizing someone a moral judgement?
Is your counter-point a moral judgement?

Sure, run away.

I'm not running, I'm trying to not derail the thread completely.
You can make a thread, or just DM me directly if you want to argue and we'll argue as long as you like.

 

[Not enough minerals Not enough]

Is every post of yours criticizing someone a moral judgement?
Is your counter-point a moral judgement?

Huh? Yes. Are you this fucking dumb?

I'm not running, I'm trying to not derail the thread completely.
You can make a thread, or just DM me directly if you want to argue and we'll argue as long as you like.

Now, that's fucking cringe.

 

[Gore San]

WAIT WAIT, DOES JOSH REALLY THINK HE HAS ANY CHANCE TO GO INTO ROGAN?!

I think he would be too afraid to be in the same room with that much steroid and beef testosterone fueled raw masculinity and joe would probably have a more interesting interview with a chimpanzee anyway. If joe pressed him on anything he would back down and would be too afraid to say anything if he did manage it. I doubt joe would want to touch the poop anyway though but he has done interviews with Alex Jones so it's not entirely out of the question either.

 

[Gore San]

View attachment 39009
Does he consider communist and socialist authoritarian? What a sperg.

It would be an accurate observation of history and objectively correct conclusion to come to regardless of him being a sperg.

 

[BurnerAccount333]

Yes.

Literal projection.

It would be an accurate observation of history and objectively correct conclusion to come to regardless of him being a sperg.

The main issue of course is that socialists aren't going to say: "Yeah, we're authoritarian."

 

[VAIDS Victim]

You can't just list most major political ideologies but then list two of them under right wing terms/understandings. It's like Vaush making a poll and you can't choose conservative or right wing, only "Nazi" or "fascist". Or a conservative poll where you can't choose liberal or progressive, only "commie".

 

[Gore San]

You can't just list most major political ideologies but then list two of them under right wing terms/understandings. It's like Vaush making a poll and you can't choose conservative or right wing, only "Nazi" or "fascist". Or a conservative poll where you can't choose liberal or progressive, only "commie".

National socialism communism socialism and fascism are all left wing and authoritarian firstly. There can be right and left wing authoritarianism it isn't just limited to one side like monarchy being right wing but are still not much different than modern dictators besides their looks. Left and right is pretty much mostly economic collective or individualism and specific ideologies such as those fall into one or the other. Secondly you're reading too much into it and capitalist isn't on there either so immediately jumping to your interpretation is pretty funny and quite telling. Like a rorschach test almost. If you look at the pattern these are all more of a government focus political identity not economic and those are all economic focused as opposed to legal focused. Not to mention libertarian and anarchist are in there as well. Depending on the status quo these could all mean different things. A Chinese conservative isn't the same and an American conservative as they have different values but both are conservative and these terms are relative. I would go as far to say as people are not any of these labels, their views are and people could have one view that is progressive and another that is conservative so are we really adding up points like it is a political alignment test? That's why it is easier for people to just say they are the side they like best even if they don't fit in.

 

[Not enough minerals Not enough]

Literal projection.

How's that projection? Critising someone or pointing out a quality or value is a moral judgement by defitnion.

National socialism communism socialism and fascism are all left wing and authoritarian firstly. There can be right and left wing authoritarianism it isn't just limited to one side like monarchy being right wing but a

"Nazism and fascism are left-wing"
Now, this thread is such a festival of retards

 

[Gore San]

How's that projection? Critising someone or pointing out a quality or value is a moral judgement by defitnion.



"Nazism and fascism are left-wing"
Now, this thread is such a festival of retards

The one thing nazis fascists socialists and communists agree on is that they want to distance themselves from eachother. You couldn't even define what left and right is. Regardless of how you do it will be biased towards a side. You just outed yourself as one of them. Doesn't matter which one because they're all retarded and they are all different flavors of shit.


Also people are missing the point of the poll is to grift to the majority of the results.

 

[thefrogninja]

still wating on @Sailfish or @Empresa to answer what they would have done if they were in Josh's place. say the washington post comes after this site, how do you respond.

Mr. Englehardt is a gentleman and a professional and would never reply in such a childish and vitriolic manner, thereby giving ammo to his enemies in exchange for asspats from his users.

 

[Gore San]

Mr. Englehardt is a professional and would never reply in such a childish and vitriolic manner.

I would have photoshopped dicks on one of her pictures and sent it in response as a tried and true classic.

 

[KampungBoy]

I think Vito is a thoroughly disgusting piece of shit but he must have really gotten under Null's skin this time because he is personally directing farmers to do a Vito thread in the Dick Masterson thread.

 

[Kramer is A Man Da]

I think Vito is a thoroughly disgusting piece of shit but he must have really gotten under Null's skin this time because he is personally directing farmers to do a Vito thread in the Dick Masterson thread.
View attachment 39023

To be fair, they drew first blood. The fact that vito's managed to get all of Josh's former associates to rally for him probably drives him up the wall. Turns out people love child molesters' personality over a sperg. Which should make sense, how else can they get away with being pedos without having a high charisma rating.

Seriously, Josh said that the only reason NP2 didn't work is that Josh's trolls forced it offline. Dick also clearly was treating him like a servant behind the scenes if Josh's spergout about moving dick's thread is anything to go by. Meanwhile Vito has been nothing but bad for Dick and now Nick and instead of getting bullied on air like Josh did, Dick is letting Vito fuck his leathery girlfriend and whomever else. Vito the pedo is living Josh's dream. No wonder josh is pissed, neither of those boomer free speech warriors were willing to fight for him but vito gets a full court press over something much harder to defend.

Its extremely fucking obvious dick and nick have declared war on the farms and Josh is just making sure his niggas know hat the move is.