like a typical lib, believing favoritism and lax enforcement has nothing to do with pattern recognition and everything to do with just dumb racism.
Already resorting to putting words in my mouth? Or else point out where I said crime is just caused by "dumb racism."
Also assuming I must be a "lib" because I'm not frothing at the mouth. You really do belong on Kiwi Farms. You gonna accuse me of being a troon next?
beyond that why the fuck would someone who has never interacted with a minority argue with me about their behavior
I said I didn't go to school with them. I did
not say "I never interacted with a minority."
You wanna talk about pattern recognition? Every time I argue with a white supremacist, they always start putting words in my mouth or completely misreading things.
its easy to be a tribal, but i wouldn't consider that civilized.
Okay then, define "civilized." I'll wait.
imagine saying the abbos and the englishmen who found them were anywhere close to the same level of civilized or that abbos on their own could have accomplished such
Already loosening those goalposts for a potential move. First its "not civilized" then its "not the same level of civilized as Englishmen." In the same paragraph, no less.
Also, you keep ignoring the "time" question. I get the feeling if I don't press that, you'll try to compare a 700bc grass hut village against 1700s London.
i mean the entire 20th century history of urban american policing proves that it wasn't just "law enforcement decided to stop trying and therefore crime increased"
Just gonna re-quote your earlier argument:
you have plenty of places in the US that have virtually stopped traffic enforcement because its apparently a waste of time vs when it was 90%+ white areas, same thing with basics like truancy laws or drug possions laws.
Just thought I'd re-quote this in case you try to memory hole it. You were first to make the argument that law enforcement just gave up, just you're trying to phrase it as "they gave up because they realized these people were natural criminals." All I'm doing is pointing out there's room to read this scenario the other way around.
I haven't even looked into whether anything you've said is even
true yet, I'm only working with the scenario you yourself handed out and pointing out the issues with your own narrative.
Prediction: You're going to tell me to do my own research.
EDIT
So to drag this around to this topic's proper place of "look how stupid Kiwi Farms is," this discussion reminded me of
this topic from awhile back.
I pointed out, somewhere in that very topic, that this theory makes no sense for the same reason Kender (a race from a D&D setting) make no sense, as 1d6chan explains
here. It's very similar to the arguments I've been making above though: basically, if black people really do have the biologically predetermined shortcomings that racists like to claim they do, they should not have survived even five generations (and
that is being generous).
You can even test this yourself, in Minecraft (as in, the actual game--not a metaphor for anything): Start a new world, put it on "Hardcore" mode, then play your character as if he really does act like a white supremacist's idea of a black person--anyone you meet you have to kill because you're biologically disposed towards crime, you can't build anything beyond wooden tools or any structure more complex than a mud hut, and any task that would take longer than ten minutes you must give up on.
Tell me how long you last.