More on the Kevin Crawley smear-dossier or
"Summary of Identity and Activity" that
Kathryn Tewson, the Litigation & Investigation Paralegal at KUSK had prepped for LFZ in 2024, that LFJ used in order to doxx Kevin online and get him fired at Meta.
Report Prepared for Liz Fong-Jones by Kamerman, Uncyk, Soniker & Klein, P.C. by Kathryn Tewson, Investigator.Summary:“Mailfrawd” is a pseudonymous user...
archive.org
Kevin is doxxed by name and address on the very first page. The mirror on Archive.org is redacted, by I guess the original version that LFJ shared in
the LinkedIn post that he later deleted to cover up was unredacted:
I have read the smear-dossier again, and it's actually terrifying how this document offers such an insight into LFJ vindictive obsessiveness. This is the first time I myself have read this dossier, two years too late, because I left KF in January of 2023 and this was apparently posted on LinkedIn in 2024, when I had already stopped keeping up with KF/DKF drama. Now I wish I had read this
"Summary of Identity and Activity" before, because it shows what it actually at stake if LFJ gets his hands on Kiwi doxx through his DMCA subpoena. Having read this document, it is my opinion that neither LFJ or the KUSK law firm can be trusted to be good faith custodians of subpoenaed Kiwi doxx, because KUSK have already assisted LFJ with the doxxing of a KiwiFarmer
as well as his wife and child who were entirely unrelated parties to the actual dispute. Any claim or promise from LFJ, or his legal firm, not to use DMCAed Kiwi doxx for anything other than pursuing copyrights is thus provably false.
AFAIK, Null has never discussed or responded to the outing of Kevin Crawley on MATI or anywhere else. Null mentioning Kevin Crawley by name as someone who has been targeted by LFJ on a recent MATI is, AFAIK, the first time Null has even brought him up in public.
Having now read the smear-dossier, I have to wonder why Null has never discussed this at length before. Null, don't you understand that the "infringers" need to see this? You need to show them so that they have an idea of what LFJ has in store for them if you fail to quash the subpoena and he ends up getting their doxx. You shouldn't hide this from them.
The Kevin Crawley smear-dossier is attributed to Kathryn Tewson alone, as if she alone had worked on it and written it, but it very obvious to me that it has LFJ's hands all over it. I personally suspect, but have obviously no way to prove conclusively, that the dossier was attributed to Kathryn alone for no other reason than to deflect from accusations of cyberstalking and doxxing. Kathryn Tewson's status as a paralegal at KUSK is meant to give this smear-dossier the veneer of legality. LFJ thought it might help to make it seem like he hired someone else to do the obsessive cyberstalking for him.
Why do I suspect LFJ of having written this smear-dossier? At one point in the dossier Kathryn Tewson brings up details about LFJ's professional life that Kathryn Tewson could not have known unless LFJ himself had authored that part of the dossier. Based on this, I will infer that LFJ authored most if not all of the dossier. Kathryn Tewson might have done the sleuth work of collecting Kevin Crawley's social media accounts and then pulling his posts, but this smear-dossier is, I believe, the work of LFJ.
Additionally there is an occasional pettiness to this dossier that is in line with the way former associates of LFJ have described him as someone who is very petty, as f.e. Naia Okami did in his leaked DMs to Null after he broke with #DropKiwiFarms over their apparent criminality. In these leaked DMs Naia Okami described Liz to Null as someone who
"is that level petty".
For example, this part of the dossier displays LFJ's typical pettiness, a pettiness that I think a professional paralegal wouldn't allow themselves to indulge:
Recall in this context of LFJ's pettiness that one tweet from LFJ where he said that
"the best form of moderation" online is not to just hand down a ban, but also
"to ridicule and ostracize" someone for getting banned:
Then there is the targeting of someone's wife and kid, which we saw before in the targeting of Rob Tyree's wife Natalie Tyree by #DropKiwiFarms. This too to me suggests that the dossier was (mostly) authored by LFJ himself. Would a professional paralegal be doxxing an 11 year old child and his mother by name, if neither of them were a direct party to the dispute in question? I'll give Kathryn Tewson the benefit of the doubt, given that
she herself has two kids, and assume she wouldn't do something like this to someone's family. IMO, only someone like LFJ would be so fucking degenerate and depraved as to doxx someone's wife and 11 year old kid and declare them "fair game" in his public vendetta.
What were LFJ and Kathryn Tewson trying to achieve with the smear-dossier, other than getting him fired at Meta? Perhaps some or all of the following:
1) to unmask Kevin as a KiwiFarms user and to punish him because he called for LFJ to be deplatformed at tech conferences after having dealt with him personally and found him to be "as annoying" as he's made out to be in his KF thread
2) to selectively quote other social media post by Kevin, especially offsite posts on other platforms like Reddit, to paint a false narrative of Kevin becoming increasingly radicalized many the years online, only to end up on the final boss of hate-sites, KiwiFarms
3) to doxx his wife and kid, for no other reason than them being his family. This doxxing and targeting of family members is reminiscent of the way #DropKiwiFarms went after Natalie Tyree, Rob Tyree's wife
4) to threaten with the doxxing of more Kiwis whom LFJ suspects are also Big Tech insiders like Kevin.
5) to avenge LFJ personally for having once provided a professional reference to Kevin Crawley that Liz claims landed him a job (as if his own professional credentials didn't do that). Getting a reference from Liz apparently means to have to pledge eternal allegiance to him and his woke ideology, even if you change your mind on leftism, transgenderism or anything else LFJ espouses.
6) to allow LFJ to hysterically damsel-in-distress about being in imminent danger from Kevin, despite him having stated that he no longer works in the same field as LFJ and no longer personally attends tech conferences because he finds them to be tiring. These public admissions from Kevin are quoted in the dossier, but LFJ still insists that this man is somehow a direct danger to him and even his fellow co-workers at Meta. By making him sound like a danger to his colleagues, they were hoping to ostracize him from his professional community.
If you are a Kiwi lurking here wondering what LFJ and his lawyers at KUSK have in store for you, I would strongly encourage you to go to Archive.org and read the smear-dossier for yourself. Pay particular attention to the part in the dossier where LFJ claims that he has identified additional KiwiFarms accounts from Big Tech insiders that he suspects of being Kiwis, threatening to "unmask" those as well in a future smear-dossier. AFAIK, that future dossier with more Big Tech insiders who are Kiwis never actually came out... or perhaps it's currently "in the making".
BTW, this is the only time that I've seen LFJ outright deny the "dog hair on the shirt is rape" story:
"The references to a "rape confession" are an entirely false rehash of a defamatory lie, made up by KiwiFarms users in an attempt to damage Liz's reputation."
As for the part about an Australian court declaring these statements defamatory, that was a default judgement so the question of them being defamatory was never actually argued because Vincent never responded to the lolsuit. No one gives a shit what an Australian court has to say about these statements anyway, because you can't re-enforce foreign judgement in the US if it affects free speech, as per
the SPEECH Act. All LFJ is doing here is admitting he went all the way to Australia and even claimed residence there, under false pretenses of staying for two years for the sake of his visa just as he was condo-shopping in NYC, just to forum shop and commit
"libel tourism" against Vincent and KF. If LFJ's KUSK lawyers were worth their salt, they could've told LFJ his Australian "libel tourism' default judgement is null and void in the US because of the SPEECH Act.
Reddit (not KF!) has a different reading though of LFJ's "consent accident" statement:
So, LFJ, is Reddit also defaming you by interpreting your "consent accident" statement in this way?
Are you now going to send out subpoenas to Reddit to doxx these redditors for not believing your claims about the dog hair on the shirt story, and assuming you are using the term "consent accident" to downplay something way more severe than you're making it seem?
Maybe LFJ can now also come out and also deny the claims from his Google colleague in that 2015 Hacker News (that he got Y-Combinator to censor his name out of) about him, ALLEGEDLY, being OK with troons watching and sharing CSEM and sexually assaulting straight men.
Kim Gordon - "DIRTY TECH" (Official Video)