So I checked LFJ's Bsky account to see if he's said anything about Null suing him:
šŗšøš³ļøāšš³ļøāā§ļøš„āļøšš©š½āš» in š¦šŗšØš¦ working on šÆā¬¢š she/it
bsky.app
Not a word. It's like he doesn't want people to know he's being sued by the guy whose site he tried and failed to take down 4 years ago.
He is visiting Seattle from Canada, but apparently he's scared of flying into the US:
Null's lolsuit on PACERmonitor.com
New York Southern District Court
Judge: Katherine Polk Failla
Case #: 1:26-cv-02059
Nature of Suit 820 Property Rights - Copyrights
Cause 28:2201cp Declaratory Judgment (Copyright)
Lolcow LLC v. Fong-Jones (1:26-cv-02059), New York Southern District Court, Filed: 03/12/2026
www.pacermonitor.com
The lolsuit is filed under "property rights - copyrights", so I guess the only thing the judge is going to look at is whether Null's users' Fair Use rights trump LFJ's ownership of his likeness.
Update in the lolsuit: LFJ wants to subpoena Null under 17 U.S.C. Ā§ 512(h), which means LFJ wants to bypass whatever Null wants to do, to use the DMCA to force Null legally to disclose the identities of the users who posted the screenshots of his glamour shot from Bsky.
See it as a "Kiwi Deanonymization Subpoena".
(h)Subpoena To Identify Infringer.ā
(1)Request.ā
A copyright owner or a person authorized to act on the ownerās behalf may request the clerk of any United States district court to issue a subpoena to a service provider for identification of an alleged infringer in accordance with this subsection.
(2)Contents of request.āThe request may be made by filing with the clerkā
(A)a copy of a notification described in subsection (c)(3)(A);
(B)a proposed subpoena; and
(C)a sworn declaration to the effect that the purpose for which the subpoena is sought is to obtain the identity of an alleged infringer and that such information will only be used for the purpose of protecting rights under this title.
(3)Contents of subpoena.ā
The subpoena shall authorize and order the service provider receiving the notification and the subpoena to expeditiously disclose to the copyright owner or person authorized by the copyright owner information sufficient to identify the alleged infringer of the material described in the notification to the extent such information is available to the service provider.
(4)Basis for granting subpoena.ā
If the notification filed satisfies the provisions of subsection (c)(3)(A), the proposed subpoena is in proper form, and the accompanying declaration is properly executed, the clerk shall expeditiously issue and sign the proposed subpoena and return it to the requester for delivery to the service provider.
(5)Actions of service provider receiving subpoena.ā
Upon receipt of the issued subpoena, either accompanying or subsequent to the receipt of a notification described in subsection (c)(3)(A), the service provider shall expeditiously disclose to the copyright owner or person authorized by the copyright owner the information required by the subpoena, notwithstanding any other provision of law and regardless of whether the service provider responds to the notification.
(6)Rules applicable to subpoena.ā
Unless otherwise provided by this section or by applicable rules of the court, the procedure for issuance and delivery of the subpoena, and the remedies for noncompliance with the subpoena, shall be governed to the greatest extent practicable by those provisions of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure governing the issuance, service, and enforcement of a subpoena duces tecum.
www.law.cornell.edu
Yeah bullshit, LFJ's
"swon declaration" not to abuse any user information obtained from Null, pinkie promise, is meaningless in the context of everything he did and said during #DropKiwiFarms:
(C)a sworn declaration to the effect that the purpose for which the subpoena is sought is to obtain the identity of an alleged infringer and that such information will only be used for the purpose of protecting rights under this title.
Oh sure, the troon is gonna use the obtained Kiwi doxx
"only for the purpose of protecting his rights".
And then LFJ gets hacked by Hackers on Estradiol who "steal" and leak the .pdf with Kiwi user logs all over the internet, and then it's
"woops, I totally didn't mean for these KiwiFarms logs to get stolen and leaked online your honour, pinkie promise, I am just a victim of these evil Hackers on Estradiol, your honour, tee-hee!" (despite circumstantial evidence showing #DropKiwiFarms were in contact with the hackers in Signal group chats, but whatever)
Reminder that this is the same troon who, during #DropKiwiFarms replied with
"drip, drip, drip" to another TRA troon claiming he was gonna start doxxing alt right groups:
Null was right with his speculation on MATI: LFJ's DMCA request is not about enforcing copyrights or having his glamour shot with the lens-flare taken down, this is LFJ abusing the DMCA to force Null's hand to violate the privacy of his users. LFJ has found a legal loophole in the DMCA to doxx Kiwis legally.
Funny how LFJ insisted he needed 3+ months to respond to the lolsuit, which request Hardin did not object to, but then LFJ immediately suckerpunches Hardin with this shit.
So the troon wants to play hardball with his Google millions.
ghostarchive.org
