Podcast Flyer
Welcome Statement🧅
Welcome to Onionfarms. All races, ethnicities, religions. Gay, straight, bisexual. CIS or trans. It makes no difference to us. If you can rock with us, you are one of us. We are here for you and always will be.
Follow Onionfarms/Kenneth Erwin Engelhardt
Onionfarms Merchandise(Stripe Verified): Onionmart
Onionfarms.net (Our social network site powered by Humhub).Register and up your own little space to chat and hang out in.
Joshua Conner Moon - Kiwi Farms Joshua Moon Megathread
- Thread starter Randy Know
- Start date
- Featured
-
- Tags
- 1776hosting 1776hosting.com 2tsuki bear chemical cringe deceptive deviant dick fancy fancy bear farms fat flow flow chemical fraud huckster josh joshua conner moon joshua connor moon joshua moon kengle kenneth erwin engelhardt kiwi kiwifarms mental illness moon null onionfarms picture pizza stocking vincent vincent zhen warwick ri zhen
Joshua Moon the owner of Kiwifarms
Ashley Hutsell JanKuntowski
I live at 408 Blanche St, Hixson, Tn 37343-4701 and I am a fat ass
Hellovan Onion
Then why are you here
Nobody Important
Registered Member
There's this contradiction in his thinking that he never seems to be able to reconcile:
- the only reason KiwiFarms has any success is due to most reasonable people's unwillingness to host a high profile grey-area site which will be the target of constant frivolous lawsuits and alienation from banking and payment processors (supposedly)
- Josh insists that if he was allowed "banking and payment processors" instead of needing grey-area payments like crypto, he would have had much more success because "normies" would have paid him.
- But if that came true, Josh would no longer have the "moat" of nobody else competent willing to compete in the same market-share, and all his inadequacies would mean Kiwifarms would be entirely castigated by a competently run and organized competitor.
Does he seriously think anyone would put up with his bullshit otherwise?
It's like a guy dealing coke on the street-corner bemoaning how if only it was legal, he'd be as rich as a Pfizer exec. Nope, you retard, if it was legal your stupid ass would be out of a job.
- the only reason KiwiFarms has any success is due to most reasonable people's unwillingness to host a high profile grey-area site which will be the target of constant frivolous lawsuits and alienation from banking and payment processors (supposedly)
- Josh insists that if he was allowed "banking and payment processors" instead of needing grey-area payments like crypto, he would have had much more success because "normies" would have paid him.
- But if that came true, Josh would no longer have the "moat" of nobody else competent willing to compete in the same market-share, and all his inadequacies would mean Kiwifarms would be entirely castigated by a competently run and organized competitor.
Does he seriously think anyone would put up with his bullshit otherwise?
It's like a guy dealing coke on the street-corner bemoaning how if only it was legal, he'd be as rich as a Pfizer exec. Nope, you retard, if it was legal your stupid ass would be out of a job.
Jewsh has probably personally banned at least 120k of those. Thin skinned faggot.
Not only that but the site would be neutered as fuck.
It's already happening with people censoring themselves with different phrasing of specific words because he "doesn't want to get into trouble", which is ironic because there would be a fuck-ton of other things he is currently doing that CAN get him into trouble.
I don't pretend to know law, but I sure as shit know that josh has no idea wtf he's talking about when he says one thing is O.K. but the other thing isn't.
Sneeder Griffin
Baby Onion
So Null's been sitting at 2lbs/week for a while now, meaning that he's eating at a 1,000 calorie deficit per day. At 1,600 calories per day, this would put his current TDEE (Total Daily Energy Expenditure) at 2,600 calories.
We know from photos of Josh alongside Hotwheels (posted earlier in the thread) that Josh is about 1.75 wheelchairs in height, which puts him at 5'3". For a 5'3" man to have a TDEE of 2,600 calories, they would need to be around 290 pounds, which gives him a current BMI of 51.4. This is likely Null's current weight, with his weight at the beginning of the year being around 325 pounds, with a BMI of 57.6. To put this in perspective, Nikocado Avocado had a BMI of 62.6 at his peak weight.
This might shed some light on why Josh mysteriously moved back to the United States. Being this size for decades (likely since childhood, judging by leaked pics of Josh as a kid) does massive damage to your health and can result in heart disease, diabetes, and other diseases. And Serbia's health care system probably isn't the most reliable. Did Josh move back to the United States to get better treatment for his Type II diabetes (or another obesity related disease)? This would explain why Josh is so obsessed with losing weight as of late after gorging on whole blocks of cheese for a decade. Diabetes is also very expensive to manage, which would explain why Null is whining so much about how America is expensive and why he is begging for money so often.
TheCIAGlowsInTheDark
Hellovan Onion
If Jersh really wants to fight debanking, it makes more sense to deregulate rather than regulate because the problem of debanking itself comes mostly from America's badly written criminal and civil laws that are often easily abused by power hungry left-wing activists.
So why does debanking happen in the first place? American federal law gives organizations like the Southern Poverty Law Center, the NAACP, and the Anti Defamation League the power to shut down anyone they don't like.
Why do so many people on the Far-Right in America get debanked? Simple, it has to do with America's anti-terrorism laws that makes it very difficult for anyone on the Far-Right to monetize their content (this isn't the 1980's anymore back when the Far-Right had much better access to money).
Let's start with two things that lead us to where we are now; Columbine and 9/11.
The Columbine High School massacre lead to local jurisdictions being stricter on students making any alleged death threats both IRL and online. Eric Harris (the ring leader of the massacre) had a website where he threatened to kill his fellow students and he even published a tutorial on his website on how to make bombs if you are under the age of 18. Eric Harris was reported to the authorities but nothing came of it and Eric Harris took down his website long before the authorities could do anything about it. There really was no one to stop Eric Harris and Dylan Klebold despite the duo explicitly stating they wanted to blow up their school so their plan to commit the shooting tragically went through on April 20th, 1999.
Since then, every local and state justification have enacted legalization on surveilling students that could pose a threat to others because no one really wants another Columbine massacre or another Virginia Tech massacre on their hands. So you could say this was the beginning of the modern surveillance state as we know it.
Then there was 9/11.
Tl;dr, a bunch of retarded Muslims thinking they were going to get their 72 virgins in the afterlife would volunteer to crash airplanes into the World Trade Center, the Pentagon, and the fourth plane never reaching its final destination after the passengers of the fourth hijacked plane learned of ongoing the terrorist attack (the passengers in Flight 93 fought back against the hijackers).
After 9/11, the American federal government would pass some controversial legalization during the Bush years to combat terrorism, most infamously the Patriot Act (which has since been condemned by both the Left and Right alike over being in conflict with the 4th Amendment). The Bush years is where you really saw the rights of Americans being eroded away even more.
Which brings me to my main point. Why does the Far-Right gets debanked?
Historically the Far-Right in America is no stranger in being involved in terrorism (Mississippi Burning, the Oklahoma City bombing, the Pittsburgh synagogue shooting, the list goes on) so the Far-Right got caught in the crossfire by also becoming the subject on being under strict surveillance after Columbine and 9/11 because the Far-Right in America has been historically treated as domestic terrorists by the American government.
So why can't Kiwi Farms participate in the world economy?
It doesn't take much for the Southern Poverty Law Center, the NAACP, or the Anti Defamation League to put pressure on the payment processors and the credit card companies with blackmail and extortion and threatening the banks with, "This online platform supports right-wing extremism where some of their users make calls to violence against Jews, blacks, and other minority groups; it would be a darn shame if we notify the feds that you're monetizing a platform filled with right-wing extremists and we could get you in trouble under America's anti-terrorism laws. You don't want to be seen as an accessory to terrorism, do you?"
Yes some of the censorship being done by the banks can also be blamed on left-wing activism but when you look at the big picture, the biggest reason why debanking happens is because the government allows said left-wing activists to bully their opponents through the power of the state (the poorly written laws that were written by retarded boomers that are out of touch with the world). I'm not condoning terrorism so don't get the wrong idea here (because terrorism is bad and people should not live in fear in their own country because of some nutcase adopting a batshit insane ideology), this is me pointing out that moral busybodies will often take advantage of people's good will for their own gain. The banks don't want to be held legally liable so the banks will often bend the knee and cuck out to said left-wing activists groups.
This is how many left-wing activists groups often get their way because they know America's anti-terrorism laws are poorly written so they can abuse them in their favor to suppress their opposition.
So how can Jersh get Kiwi Farms to be monetized? It makes more sense to advocate to reform America's anti-terrorism laws so that they can no longer be abused by activists from the Left anymore. Take away state power where a group of moralfag budybodies can no longer be an aggressor anymore, the same group of moralfags will lose their power.
Look at DOGE and gamers. One of the very few things I will praise Trump for is establishing DOGE where one group of people that benefited from DOGE are gamers because the propaganda money that was being used to say "Gamers are bad" is now gone where now the likes of Polygon and Jezebel and Kotaku are going out of business because the propaganda money they used to get from the state that was used to demonize the gaming community is gone now. Take away the tools that are used by censorship-happy moral busybodies then the censorship-happy moral busybodies will lose their power.
So it makes more sense to deregulate what caused this mess in the first place rather than enacting new legalization to tackle debanking. You actually want less government, not more.
Jersh would actually be able to monetize Kiwi Farms if America actually had a stronger free market economy.
In my many years on this rock that we call planet Earth, I've learned that 8 to 9 times out of 10 the problems that we have in this world are usually because of the incompetence of governments that never think things through.
So why does debanking happen in the first place? American federal law gives organizations like the Southern Poverty Law Center, the NAACP, and the Anti Defamation League the power to shut down anyone they don't like.
Why do so many people on the Far-Right in America get debanked? Simple, it has to do with America's anti-terrorism laws that makes it very difficult for anyone on the Far-Right to monetize their content (this isn't the 1980's anymore back when the Far-Right had much better access to money).
Let's start with two things that lead us to where we are now; Columbine and 9/11.
The Columbine High School massacre lead to local jurisdictions being stricter on students making any alleged death threats both IRL and online. Eric Harris (the ring leader of the massacre) had a website where he threatened to kill his fellow students and he even published a tutorial on his website on how to make bombs if you are under the age of 18. Eric Harris was reported to the authorities but nothing came of it and Eric Harris took down his website long before the authorities could do anything about it. There really was no one to stop Eric Harris and Dylan Klebold despite the duo explicitly stating they wanted to blow up their school so their plan to commit the shooting tragically went through on April 20th, 1999.
Since then, every local and state justification have enacted legalization on surveilling students that could pose a threat to others because no one really wants another Columbine massacre or another Virginia Tech massacre on their hands. So you could say this was the beginning of the modern surveillance state as we know it.
Then there was 9/11.
Tl;dr, a bunch of retarded Muslims thinking they were going to get their 72 virgins in the afterlife would volunteer to crash airplanes into the World Trade Center, the Pentagon, and the fourth plane never reaching its final destination after the passengers of the fourth hijacked plane learned of ongoing the terrorist attack (the passengers in Flight 93 fought back against the hijackers).
After 9/11, the American federal government would pass some controversial legalization during the Bush years to combat terrorism, most infamously the Patriot Act (which has since been condemned by both the Left and Right alike over being in conflict with the 4th Amendment). The Bush years is where you really saw the rights of Americans being eroded away even more.
Which brings me to my main point. Why does the Far-Right gets debanked?
Historically the Far-Right in America is no stranger in being involved in terrorism (Mississippi Burning, the Oklahoma City bombing, the Pittsburgh synagogue shooting, the list goes on) so the Far-Right got caught in the crossfire by also becoming the subject on being under strict surveillance after Columbine and 9/11 because the Far-Right in America has been historically treated as domestic terrorists by the American government.
So why can't Kiwi Farms participate in the world economy?
It doesn't take much for the Southern Poverty Law Center, the NAACP, or the Anti Defamation League to put pressure on the payment processors and the credit card companies with blackmail and extortion and threatening the banks with, "This online platform supports right-wing extremism where some of their users make calls to violence against Jews, blacks, and other minority groups; it would be a darn shame if we notify the feds that you're monetizing a platform filled with right-wing extremists and we could get you in trouble under America's anti-terrorism laws. You don't want to be seen as an accessory to terrorism, do you?"
Yes some of the censorship being done by the banks can also be blamed on left-wing activism but when you look at the big picture, the biggest reason why debanking happens is because the government allows said left-wing activists to bully their opponents through the power of the state (the poorly written laws that were written by retarded boomers that are out of touch with the world). I'm not condoning terrorism so don't get the wrong idea here (because terrorism is bad and people should not live in fear in their own country because of some nutcase adopting a batshit insane ideology), this is me pointing out that moral busybodies will often take advantage of people's good will for their own gain. The banks don't want to be held legally liable so the banks will often bend the knee and cuck out to said left-wing activists groups.
This is how many left-wing activists groups often get their way because they know America's anti-terrorism laws are poorly written so they can abuse them in their favor to suppress their opposition.
So how can Jersh get Kiwi Farms to be monetized? It makes more sense to advocate to reform America's anti-terrorism laws so that they can no longer be abused by activists from the Left anymore. Take away state power where a group of moralfag budybodies can no longer be an aggressor anymore, the same group of moralfags will lose their power.
Look at DOGE and gamers. One of the very few things I will praise Trump for is establishing DOGE where one group of people that benefited from DOGE are gamers because the propaganda money that was being used to say "Gamers are bad" is now gone where now the likes of Polygon and Jezebel and Kotaku are going out of business because the propaganda money they used to get from the state that was used to demonize the gaming community is gone now. Take away the tools that are used by censorship-happy moral busybodies then the censorship-happy moral busybodies will lose their power.
So it makes more sense to deregulate what caused this mess in the first place rather than enacting new legalization to tackle debanking. You actually want less government, not more.
Jersh would actually be able to monetize Kiwi Farms if America actually had a stronger free market economy.
In my many years on this rock that we call planet Earth, I've learned that 8 to 9 times out of 10 the problems that we have in this world are usually because of the incompetence of governments that never think things through.
Last edited:
I don't give a shit about any degenerates, I just troll the ones that come here for fun because it's free entertainment.