Joshua Moon the owner of Kiwifarms
these first two are the same post it was just long
nulldsp12.png

nulldsp13.png


nulldsp14.png

Jewsh and their jannies are also not afraid to ban most of the DSP board either. Like when they got rid of all the mods and half the users on the DSP board a few years ago for no reason.
most of it was after Null threw a hussy fit about someone making a dear feeder joker about him
 
Some notes on the latest MATI:

Since you're still listening to MATI, has Null said anything about Section 230 lately?
He used to talk and write about it a lot during #DropKiwiFarms but I haven't listened to MATI in ages so I have no idea if he brought it up recently.

Null's favourite troon (that he was supposed to sue) is constantly BSing about Section 230 on BlueSky lately:

CaraballoSection230_01.jpg
CaraballoSection230.jpg
 
I'd say it's less of a targeted take over and more of a cultural exchange and sight seeing geg, I'd say Onionfarms has similar culture to the shlog and it would be cool to see the 2 be close
If visitors from Soyjack are interested in joining and can fit in, then I don't see any issue. We are a lot more chill than Josh.
 
6 litres? 6? For 20 years? And he's really short. He must be wider than he is tall. I mean... SIX! LITRES! You only need to drink roughly 2l of WATER a day. joshy has left out: Liver disease, gout, heart and kidney problems. (Last one means he prolly has the bladder of an 70yo woman). Oh... and erectile dysfunction.
 
Since you're still listening to MATI, has Null said anything about Section 230 lately?
He used to talk and write about it a lot during #DropKiwiFarms but I haven't listened to MATI in ages so I have no idea if he brought it up recently.

Null's favourite troon (that he was supposed to sue) is constantly BSing about Section 230 on BlueSky lately:

View attachment 86847View attachment 86848
I don't think liability protections will fully fade away from America as far as the Internet is concerned.

To me this seems like a push for that Digital Bill of Rights that Trump proposed during his election campaign where Trump's version of the Internet is basically Section 230 but discourages Big Tech from doing any censoring for legally protected speech, bans warrantless takedowns of Internet content by the government, and forcing all platforms operating in America to take down illegal content where if said platforms fulfill this criteria then they may still keep their liability protections.

I don't think Section 230 is going to fully go away and it will stay in some form or another but I think this may be taken to a back seat because Congress is still way too divided to do anything meaningful at the moment.

Although if Congress does want to go through with this, chances are Big Tech is going to interfere because Big Tech (and the rest of the Internet) loves Section 230.

So I imagine the tech companies and tech lobbyists will try to strike a deal with Congress that satisfies everyone.
 
I don't think liability protections will fully fade away from America as far as the Internet is concerned.

To me this seems like a push for that Digital Bill of Rights that Trump proposed during his election campaign where Trump's version of the Internet is basically Section 230 but discourages Big Tech from doing any censoring, bans warrantless takedowns of Internet content by the government, and forcing all platforms operating in America to take down illegal content where if said platforms fulfill this criteria then they may still keep their liability protections.

I don't think Section 230 is going to fully go away and it will stay in some form or another but I think this may be taken to a back seat because Congress is still way too divided to do anything meaningful at the moment.

Although if Congress does want to go through with this, chances are Big Tech is going to interfere because Big Tech (and the rest of the Internet) loves Section 230.

So I imagine the tech companies and tech lobbyists will try to strike a deal with Congress that satisfies everyone.

They'll try to make it so smaller sites like this very forum will always be at risk, but big tech will easily afford the new regulations and keep their Section 230 protections.

Section 230 also protects user generated content sites from having to worry about patchwork laws like obscenity where every state has their own law. I could see sites like Gelbooru having major issues if they have to worry about states like Idaho coming after them for content users post.
 
The "Autistic Cyberbully" title is the most adorable shit ever. They think that's a title that bites when really they wrote a joke that goes both ways.
 
They'll try to make it so smaller sites like this very forum will always be at risk, but big tech will easily afford the new regulations and keep their Section 230 protections.

Section 230 also protects user generated content sites from having to worry about patchwork laws like obscenity where every state has their own law. I could see sites like Gelbooru having major issues if they have to worry about states like Idaho coming after them for content users post.
We now live in a very different world though compared to the world that the Boomers grew up in.

Most of the obscenity laws that are still in the books on either a federal level or a state were passed into law back when the Religious Right used to have more power, before anime and manga became mainstream, and when DARE was still in schools to get kids off drugs (DARE was a failure by the way). Much has changed within the past 40 years. Even people these days don't throw a fit over LGBT representation in pop culture media anymore so long as its done well (back in the day Sailor Moon was censored where the lesbian relationship between Uranus and Neptune was omitted in order to not piss off hypersensitive religious people and these days no one cares that they're gay anymore because social attitudes have changed since the early-2000's and Sailor Moon is seen as one of the GOATs of Japanese entertainment).

If someone were to get arrested and charged under a obscenity offense back in the day, most of society would be arrogantly patting themselves on the back because that's how social attitudes were like back then (much like how people used to stigmatized AIDS as a gay disease where a lot of people thought only gay people can get it but now and days that notion has been thrown out the window due to how retarded that way of thinking is, anyone can get AIDS).

Now and days, Millennials, the Zoomers, and Gen Alpha which are the generations that grew up with anime and manga as we know it have different views compared to the Boomers. You still have people in the younger generations that find anime degenerate but they are a tiny minority compared to the millions that enjoy the shit out of stuff from the East.

If someone where to get charged and arrested over anime shit these days, they would be seen as a free speech martyr in the same way Tommy Robertson and Count Dankula became free speech martyrs when they got screwed over by their own government and millions backed them while rightfully condemning what the Britbong government was doing to them.

The universal consensus that I see on stuff on Japanese entertainment in general (including lolicon and shotacon) on the Internet from what I see is that it's freakishly degenerate but it should not be banned or censored for the same reasons hate speech should not be banned or censored either.

Say what you want about people like MoistCr1TiKaL or ItsAGundam or Rev Says desu or others of the like but they represent the general consensus on stuff like this where they generally preach that anime is degenerate but it should not be banned or censored and none of them are parroting what Leftoids and Kiwi Farms says about Japanese entertainment. If anything, the people that want Japanese entertainment banned or censored based on my observations are usually either retarded Leftoids on Twitter that are still in high school and don't have jobs yet or retarded Rightoids that are still stuck in 2015 and are a part of communities like Kiwi Farms.

I can also imagine that if such a thing were to happen on a large scale, I'm sure some eccentric lawyer out there looking to make a name for themselves will very likely take a free speech case like this and take it to the Supreme Court of they have to. America has plenty of Slipping Jimmies that defecated through a sunroof where they are more than willing to take on cases like these. Just saying.
 
Last edited:
We now live in a very different world though compared to the world that the Boomers grew up in.

Most of the obscenity laws that are still in the books on either a federal level or a state were passed into law back when the Religious Right used to have more power, before anime and manga became mainstream, and when DARE was still in schools to get kids off drugs (DARE was a failure by the way). Much has changed within the past 40 years. Even people these days don't throw a fit over LGBT representation in pop culture media anymore so long as its done well (back in the day Sailor Moon was censored where the lesbian relationship between Uranus and Neptune was omitted in order to not piss off hypersensitive religious people and these days no one cares that they're gay anymore because social attitudes have changed since the early-2000's and Sailor Moon is seen as one of the GOATs of Japanese entertainment).

If someone were to get arrested and charged under a obscenity offense back in the day, most of society would be arrogantly patting themselves on the back because that's how social attitudes were like back then (much like how people used to stigmatized AIDS as a gay disease where a lot of people thought only gay people can get it but now and days that notion has been thrown out the window due to how retarded that way of thinking is, anyone can get AIDS).

Now and days, Millennials, the Zoomers, and Gen Alpha which are the generations that grew up with anime and manga as we know it have different views compared to the Boomers. You still have people in the younger generations that find anime degenerate but they are a tiny minority compared to the millions that enjoy the shit out of stuff from the East.

If someone where to get charged and arrested over anime shit these days, they would be seen as a free speech martyr in the same way Tommy Robertson and Count Dankula became free speech martyrs when they got screwed over by their own government and millions backed them while rightfully condemning what the Britbong government was doing to them.

The universal consensus that I see on stuff on Japanese entertainment in general (including lolicon and shotacon) on the Internet from what I see is that it's freakishly degenerate but it should not be banned or censored for the same reasons hate speech should not be banned or censored either.

Say what you want about people like MoistCr1TiKaL or ItsAGundam or Rev Says desu or others of the like but they represent the general consensus on stuff like this where they generally preach that anime is degenerate but it should not be banned or censored and none of them are parroting what Leftoids and Kiwi Farms says about Japanese entertainment. If anything, the people that want Japanese entertainment banned or censored based on my observations are usually either retarded Leftoids on Twitter that are still in high school and don't have jobs yet or retarded Rightoids that are still stuck in 2015 and are a part of communities like Kiwi Farms.

I can also imagine that if such a thing were to happen on a large scale, I'm sure some eccentric lawyer out there looking to make a name for themselves will very likely take a free speech case like this and take it to the Supreme Court of they have to. America has plenty of Slipping Jimmies that defecated through a sunroof where they are more than willing to take on cases like these. Just saying.

Section 230 has been instrumental in limiting state interference overall, not just with obscenity. Without section 230, you'd also have to worry about defamation suits. Null would do well to support section 230 staying in tact for smaller sites and not requiring qualifications that smaller sites can't afford. (EARN IT Act is also a threat)

If Kiwi Farms could be sued directly for defamation, there goes Jersh's troll shield.
 
Section 230 has been instrumental in limiting state interference overall, not just with obscenity. Without section 230, you'd also have to worry about defamation suits. Null would do well to support section 230 staying in tact for smaller sites and not requiring qualifications that smaller sites can't afford. (EARN IT Act is also a threat)

If Kiwi Farms could be sued directly for defamation, there goes Jersh's troll shield.
I think revenge porn will likely become a federal offense by then (the TAKE IT DOWN Act is likely going to become law soon and Jersh will have no choice but to take down any content on Kiwi Farms that can be classified as revenge porn) and things like doxing may eventually be labeled as a cybersecurity and a national security threat (the way the retarded Leftoids have been doxing Tesla owners and vandalizing and destroying Tesla-branded cars is making doxing more closer to eventually become a federal offense).

So even if Section 230 survives, with the way things have been going it's likely the tools of trolling as we know it are going to be stripped away where the state will very likely enact new laws that combat toxic and dangerous behavior on the Internet because governments love useful idiots that give them any convenient excuse to enact new regulations that will affect everyone.
 
Last edited:
I think revenge porn will likely become a federal offense by then (the TAKE IT DOWN Act is likely going to become law soon and Jersh will have no choice but to take down any content on Kiwi Farms that can be classified as revenge porn) and things like doxing may eventually be labeled as a cybersecurity and a national security threat (the way the retarded Leftoids have been doxing Tesla owners and vandalizing and destroying Tesla-branded cars is making doxing more closer to eventually become a federal offense).

So even if Section 230 survives, with the way things have been going it's likely the tools of trolling as we know it are going to be stripped away where the state will very likely enact new laws that combat toxic and dangerous behavior on the Internet because governments love useful idiots that give them any convenient excuse to enact new regulations that will affect everyone.

I will not shed a tear for Soyjak going down. It will be sad seeing everything pre-2019 on KF going away as well.

As for this site, I'm sure the Booperator would likely come into compliance with the law, unlike Null who would fight a futile battle to the bitter end and lose everything in the process. (Because Jersh is a dumbass who doesn't know how to pick his battles.)
 
these first two are the same post it was just long
>Jewsh: DSP is akin to a welfare leech.
>"60% of this fucking country is on SNAP, which I pay for every year when I do my taxes."


Look at how Jewsh has to justify DSP's pathetic begging lifestyle because he is in the same boat. He has to justify taking online retards' money 'cause he knows he does the same thing ultimately. Bro, you act like you're some legitimate business mogul or something. You only have money because strangers online give you free money. Look at you crying about paying taxes, when you would be one of these same people on SNAP if you didn't have gullible morons online to hand you free money. You're not running a legitimate business. You're an e-beggar who is essentially a parasite, every bit as bad as DSP or the people on SNAP.

Since you're still listening to MATI, has Null said anything about Section 230 lately?
Nope. He hasn't said a thing about Section 230 in recent times. Too busy getting buttfucked by LFJ.
 
Reason: My paraphrase of Josh's words wasn't quite accurate.
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom