Josh attempts to intimidate streamer Steven "Destiny" Bonnell into not suing his website (for hosting his revenge pornography) by threatening to help raise money for the few people (2 as of now) who are taking Destiny to court for revenge pornography and making a spectacle of the court case should he dare sue his website. Is he aware that Destiny is a millionaire?Streamer Steven "Destiny" Bonnell has considered suing Kiwifarms for hosting revenge pornography of himself and his acquaintances. The confirmation comes from Dan Saltman, a rich Jewish man who is a member of Destiny's inner-circle.

That's right. Feminist Josh™ believes Destiny trying to get the revenge porn of himself and others off of his website is "censorship-by-litigation bullshit."
Kiwifarms users will likely reason that Destiny isn't a victim of revenge pornography because he shared revenge porn of other people, but this isn't true legally and two wrongs do not make a right. Destiny is both a preparator AND a victim of revenge pornography. How can they support women suing Destiny for revenge pornography (posting online photos or videos of someone's intimate body parts without consent) while also threatening legal action against Destiny for the same conduct? If Destiny intimidated his victims into silence Kiwifarms users would rightly call him a piece of shit.
Furthermore Josh himself makes no mention as to the legality of his personal hosting revenge pornography, is actually quite waffly on the issue, and has previously stated he is happy to removed content under court order. In essence, Josh believes he can continue to break the law (hosting revenge pornography) because no one has taken him to court over it.
Josh seethes at a superchatter who accurately calls out his weak rhetoric around hosting revenge pornography of DSP's wife's sister. Josh says how he really feels about revenge pornography and what he was too afraid to say to an audience of thousands that weren't his:
"She's a whore. She's a literal backpage prostitute and I don't give a fuck what happens to her. As far as morals go I don't give a shit."
![]()
DSPcompression (August 27th, 2024) - Mad at the Internet
https://madattheinternet.com/2024/08/27/dspcompression/ Durov and Zuckerberg, Dustborn and Concord, Vendettachans and prostitutes with vendettas, Juju and Tate, Rekieta and Ralph, Ian Foote, and the Drumble.com
Josh stated in November 2024 that "starting a new lawsuit right now is not in our interest." What has exactly changed since then that taking on another court case is suddenly in his interest? Is he saying that hosting revenge porn is in his interest?
Last edited: