Josh claims he can't be held respon[sible] for hosting revenge porn. I'm sure all those revenge porn websites that were shut down over the years once thought the very same thing!
Has Null seen this?
49 States + DC + Two Territories Now have Laws Against Nonconsensual Distribution of Intimate Images
![]()
Nonconsensual Distribution of Intimate Images - Cyber Civil Rights Initiative
cybercivilrights.org
We already went over this during his legal threats against Epik. I warned Null at the time that "porn doesn't stop being porn just because it's cross-posted to KF in order to be used as evidence to denounce the LGBT". Likewise, revenge porn doesn't stop being revenge porn because it's being cross-posted to KF to denounce a public figure.
Null said "I hate whores"... which by his logic would mean that he views both Destiny and Pixie as "whores" for filming himselves having sex. Null runs a forum full of filth and obscenity and cross-posted pornography, all in the name of "exposing the predatory LGBT"... then he acts surprised when his ISP blocks his domain for violating their ToS which explicitly states they don't allow ANY pornography or obscenity and don't want to be liable for it.
Null wants to have his cake and eat it. He wants to have a forum full of obscenity, without it being considered as obscenity, just because it was posted on his forum to be denounced. But then Null has to warn Kiwis against dumping their porn folders onto KF, instructing them to write reviews of the porn to make it look like it's criticism.
Null, why do you need to post a picture of a masturbating Telegram pedophile on KiwiFarms in order for you to expose him as a pedo? You claim you already have his own statements where this man openly admits to being a pedophile, openly admits to raping children for money, so why do you need to post the actual images he was using to groom children on his Telegram?











