Projects/Repair Work Needed

Onion Logo (Mobile Settings): Status: Mostly Resolved(June 14, 2025)

Onion Logo setting on same line as nav settings (like Kiwifarms)Status:(Not Yet Started)

Badges project: For starting threads that go viral: Status:(Not Yet Started) - June 14, 2025

Blocking Plugin: Status:(Almost Ready -Testing on local server) - June 14, 2025

Text Issue: No difference between bolded text and regular text: Status: (Not Yet Started) -June 14, 2025

Rocket Chat: Status: Finished (June 14, 2025)


The Navigation bar has now been unsticked on all themes

Welcome: If you can rock with us, you are one of us.

Find member

  • Chat is open if you want to hang out and talk about whatever. The community featured submissions are under the Onionfarms.net-homepage tab.
Joshua Moon the owner of Kiwifarms
This comic reminded me of Josh.
View attachment 83955
It's another episode of Casanova Josh™ giving relationship advice.
Screenshot_20250221_210539_Samsung Internet.jpg
 
View attachment 84888
No, we don't save embarassments.
So regarding the whole "teenagers don't know shit and they're fucking stupid" thing

How does he explain high-school sweethearts that stay together the rest of their lives?

Granted that's really not a thing these days as it used to be decades ago, but it's still a thing. Are they stupid for doing that as well because they decided to be with just ONE person and not explore their options?

i get it, teens do stupid shit, but this is just as bad as saying we need to dumb down media for children because they can't handle complex situations. There are plenty of teens that act mature for their age and have gotten with the program long before the rest of the herd.
 
It's another episode of Casanova Josh™ giving relationship advice.
View attachment 84881
Jersh, Chris-Chan has a legitimate girlfriend and you're still alone.

Me taking relationship advice from Jersh would be like me taking stock trading advice from Homer Simpson.
View attachment 84888
No, we don't save embarassments.
Jersh forgets that concepts like childhood and legal protections for minors are recent concepts in recorded human history.

The idea that society has an altruistic obligation to add legal protections for minors wouldn't really be prevalent until the Industrial Revolution when social activists of the day were concerned about the well being of kids and teenagers working dangerous jobs (like factory work and mining) along with minors at the time being targeted by bad people. Back then, minors were expected to grow up fast and adapt to their environments fast because the law of the jungle often did not permit minors to fully enjoy their youthful years (in many ancient cultures, when you turned around 10 to 13 years old you were expected to learn the basics of home economics, learn how to grow crops, learn how to raise cattle, getting a job, you may be drafted to go to war if you were male, get married and often people below the age of 18 got married in those days, learn how to travel by horse, and the list goes on). Things like childhood and legal protections for minors are luxuries that can be afforded by developed first-world countries and some second-world counties.

If you want to look at how humanity used to be like back then, look no further than the third-world where kids and teenagers mature faster than their first-world and second-world counterparts because they have to adapt faster to their situations. Go to some African or Latin American country where it's not an uncommon sight to see a 14 year old driving a car to run errands; even if said third-world countries have laws that say how old you have to be to drive a car they're often unenforced because that's just how things are over there.

This isn't me saying that legal protections for minors is a bad thing (because legal protections for minors have been a net positive for humanity). This is me pointing out that legal protections for minors was a luxury that only the rich and powerful could afford while the plebeians had to deal with shit the world throws at them (disease, exploitation, war, famine, whatever the case may be).

If Jersh were to travel to a third-world country and look at how kids and teenagers act there then he would realize they are far more mature for their ages than those living in a first-world country because third-world living is borderline living under the law of the jungle where you are required to grow up faster in the third-world. Legal protections for minors is a first-world luxury, it is not universal. If tomorrow we see that the first-world nations as we know them collapses, the situation for minors living in said former first-world countries would return back to how things were before the Industrial Revolution.
 
Last edited:
Its ironic that grifter retard thinks it has anything to say about marriage.
A reminder that Chris-Chan has a better chance of getting married than Jersh does.

At least Chris-Chan is shown that he can get a girlfriend (CWC is currently in a relationship) so CWC's prospects of getting married and potentially having a kid is higher unlike Jersh and many of the Kiwis.

So far Chris-Chan is winning at life.
 
Jersh, Chris-Chan has a legitimate girlfriend and you're still alone.

Me taking relationship advice from Jersh would be like me taking stock trading advice from Homer Simpson.

Jersh forgets that concepts like childhood and legal protections for minors are recent concepts in recorded human history.

The idea that society has an altruistic obligation to add legal protections for minors wouldn't really be prevalent until the Industrial Revolution when social activists of the day were concerned about the well being of kids and teenagers working dangerous jobs (like factory work and mining) along with minors at the time being targeted by bad people. Back then, minors were expected to grow up fast and adapt to their environments fast because the law of the jungle often did not permit minors to fully enjoy their youthful years (in many ancient cultures, when you turned around 10 to 13 years old you were expected to learn the basics of home economics, learn how to grow crops, learn how to raise cattle, getting a job, you may be drafted to go to war if you were male, get married and often people below the age of 18 got married in those days, learn how to travel by horse, and the list goes on). Things like childhood and legal protections for minors are luxuries that can be afforded by developed first-world countries and some second-world counties.

If you want to look at how humanity used to be like back then, look no further than the third-world where kids and teenagers mature faster than their first-world and second-world counterparts because they have to adapt faster to their situations. Go to some African or Latin American country where it's not an uncommon sight to see a 14 year old driving a car to run errands; even if said third-world countries have laws that say how old you have to be to drive a car they're often unenforced because that's just how things are over there.

This isn't me saying that legal protections for minors is a bad thing (because legal protections for minors have been a net positive for humanity). This is me pointing out that legal protections for minors was a luxury that only the rich and powerful could afford while the plebeians had to deal with shit the world throws at them (disease, exploitation, war, famine, whatever the case may be).

If Jersh were to travel to a third-world country and look at how kids and teenagers act there then he would realize they are far more mature for their ages than those living in a first-world country because third-world living is borderline living under the law of the jungle where you are required to grow up faster in the third-world. Legal protections for minors is a first-world luxury, it is not universal. If tomorrow we see that the first-world nations as we know them collapses, the situation for minors living in said former first-world countries would return back to how things were before the Industrial Revolution.
Driving ages around the world are not all that different: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_minimum_driving_ages#/media/File:Driving_Age_---_Global.svg

Age of puberty
Age of puberty.jpg
 
If Jersh were to travel to a third-world country and look at how kids and teenagers act there then he would realize they are far more mature for their ages than those living in a first-world country because third-world living is borderline living under the law of the jungle where you are required to grow up faster in the third-world. Legal protections for minors is a first-world luxury, it is not universal. If tomorrow we see that the first-world nations as we know them collapses, the situation for minors living in said former first-world countries would return back to how things were before the Industrial Revolution.
Hell, if he went to some place like Cambodia, or other places like that, he'd be having to bitch every single little minute that he'd have to work in whatever the conditions are there, meanwhile the children up there are working every single minute.
 
Josh has added special rules to streamer Steven "Destiny" Bonnell's thread (possibly out of fear of pending litigation) when every other popular lolcow, like lolcow Ethan Ralph, has the same kind of behavior going on in thief respective threads.
Screenshot_20250223_013925_Samsung Internet.jpg

He also warned a user for instructing others to flag Destiny. This isn't the issue as we all know Kiwifarms is full of flaggers. The issue is the threat was made directly and would give Destiny a weapon. When other users indirectly threatened to dox the children of Destiny's friend Dan Saltman and alluded to make phone calls to her employer nobody was warned at all.
Screenshot_20250223_014159_Samsung Internet.jpg
 
Last edited:
well that's fucking surprising.PNG

Well I'll be goddamned, Josh is doing some due-diligence it seems, banning faggots who de-rail the destiny thread, and somehow some fucking way, he agrees that it's classless to make fun of destiny for being molested, wow, that's something I'd say. Genuinely shocked.
 
View attachment 84985
Well I'll be goddamned, Josh is doing some due-diligence it seems, banning faggots who de-rail the destiny thread, and somehow some fucking way, he agrees that it's classless to make fun of destiny for being molested, wow, that's something I'd say. Genuinely shocked.
Only because users ITT were arguing with his dingleberry, Lidl. I bet he banned them, but not Dingle Drip.
 
Hell, if he went to some place like Cambodia, or other places like that, he'd be having to bitch every single little minute that he'd have to work in whatever the conditions are there, meanwhile the children up there are working every single minute.
It would basically be this if Jersh were to move to a third-world country where a job he'd most likely get is in agriculture.
 
View attachment 84985
Well I'll be goddamned, Josh is doing some due-diligence it seems, banning faggots who de-rail the destiny thread, and somehow some fucking way, he agrees that it's classless to make fun of destiny for being molested, wow, that's something I'd say. Genuinely shocked.
Josh giving week-long bans for "Infighting" but doesn't even warn those who've cheered Destiny's molestation dozens of times :haha: (he just advises against it because he agrees it makes his site look terrible) and ONLY because Lidl entered the thread to police it of these disgusting comments :haha::haha:

Meanwhile he's banned users for giving him weight loss advice.
 
Last edited:
View attachment 84985
Well I'll be goddamned, Josh is doing some due-diligence it seems, banning faggots who de-rail the destiny thread, and somehow some fucking way, he agrees that it's classless to make fun of destiny for being molested, wow, that's something I'd say. Genuinely shocked.
Seems to be the only reason why Jersh is doing this is to minimize any legal liabilities in regards to the Destiny drama.

He's just looking out for his own self-interests, nothing more.
 
Post date: November 29, 2024
You see, normal cases of nudes and revenge porn are hidden behind a filter that requires you to log-in before you see it, but because Josh hates Destiny and wants him to face the maximum level of embarrassment and blowback it's free for anyone to see.
"Kiwifarms is a SFW site!" :Null
Last MATI Josh conceded that (under looming legal threats from streamer Steven "Destiny" Bonnell) he has placed restrictions on all of his and his friends' revenge porn that requires users to register an account to see it. This comes after 4 months of it being widely available and crashing his website. Josh needs to explain why it took him over 100 days to hide the revenge porn from the public, which is supposed to be "standard practice" during it's first usage on Kiwifarms.

He claims he is "stuck in an uncomfortable situation" and explains before the timestamp above that he dislikes that Destiny didn't bother going after other websites (twitter? discord?) when everyone knows Kiwifarms was the biggest source of the leaks and the leaker specifically selected Kiwifarms to dump everything and launder it to the internet. Josh claims his insistence on hosting revenge pornography is some kind of "freedom of information" issue. What Josh doesn't tell his users is that people intentionally use Kiwifarms to dump information and revenge porn on lolcows because Josh will protect it. If you're unfamiliar with this idea, a Kiwifarms user recorded himself having sex with the drug-addled sister of DSP's wife. Josh banned the user for this behavior, but kept his revenge porn on the website. DSP called Josh out on hosting such content on his website as the user only did this because he hated DSP and told Josh how stupid it was to ban the user and not the content because people will just make new accounts (or use alt account) to post similar content knowing Josh won't delete it. Josh stuttered and stammered throughout his response and could only give weak answers. Any sensible person knows DSP is speaking truth.

What did Josh concede days later at the end of his stream when a donator rightly told him his response to DSP was pathetic?
"She's a whore. She's a literal backpage prostitute and i don't give a fuck what happens to her. As far as morals go I don't give a shit."
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom