More of Null being sexually harassed by the soyteens.
Race/etnicitiy/religion/lgbt/neurodiverse. If you can rock with us, you are one of us. Individual Opinions expressed on the forum don't necessarily reflect official positions on Onionfarms.
Null 🥝 Joshua Moon Megathread: White Supremacist KF Owner: Possible Tranny with BJC (Big Jeet Cock) Envy
- Thread starter Randy Know
- Start date
- Featured
-
- Tags
- 1776hosting 1776hosting.com 2tsuki bear chemical cringe deceptive deviant dick fancy fancy bear farms fat flow flow chemical fraud huckster josh joshua conner moon joshua connor moon joshua moon kengle kenneth erwin engelhardt kiwi kiwifarms mental illness moon null onionfarms picture pizza stocking vincent vincent zhen warwick ri zhen
Joshua Moon the owner of Kiwifarms
More of Null being sexually harassed by the soyteens.
caporchief
Registered Member
I came to KiwiFarms in the aftermath of the 4chan shutdown. I wasn't impressed. No, I'm not a sock. Yes, I should go back to my (dead lol) site. I apologize upfront for being a newfag. But what I saw indicated KiwiFarms is worse run than even the absolutely rancid shithole I'm from, due to its owner. I think all the users who joined after 4chan's death will ultimately leave, except for those who like gargling balls.
Null's unaddressed psychological issues guarantee he will eventually piss off his new userbase (Christian traditionalists, radical feminists, humorless spergs) when he relapses into his old behavior. Which he will, because:
Null will make a mistake. And because of the userbase he has deliberately cultivated (i.e. tradcons,radfems, spergs), his mistake will have the exact same consequences as lowtax. The massive irony is that Null will see his "empire" spectacularly implode in the exact same way as lowtax did, for the same reasons Null called lowtax out for doing nearly a decade ago.
tl;dr: Null exhibits fatherless behavior, 0/10 would not have sex with.
>He shamelessly begs for money and/or sympathy.
The only reason he let registrations stay open during the 4chan invasion is because its collapse offers both (and an ability to preen the same way he did during SomethingAwful's various meltdowns). After the last few years of telling anons to go back to 4chan, suddenly Null is welcoming and proffering his dick to be sucked in their thread. The motives are transparent.
>He's a monomaniacal crank.
Nowadays, this mostly emerges on the issues of Islam, trannies, and the banking system. His objection to trannies isn't based on principle or the fact men in dresses are funny, it's because trannies almost killed his site. Instead of laughing at the angry men in dresses, nowadays he gets butthurt. "Trannies! Muslims! Pedos! Incels!" is his immediate buttmad response when he's losing an argument (which is often). He dresses up his egotistic response in moral language.
>He has a massive ego and will jettison past principles based on present whims.
His attitude on politics (>I hate politics/here's a political headline!) is schizophrenic and reactionary. His attitude shifts depending on whether he needs donations or not.
>His free speech beliefs are hypocritical.
When he's out shaking the donation cup, you're helping him stand up for free speech on the internet. When another site closes down, it's their fault for not being cool like him. But as soon as you disagree on one of Null's monomanias, he flips out, you get banned, and Null says "muh freezepeach" despite invoking the very same argument when no payment processor wants to deal with him.
>His attitude to offensive content is now 2013 SJW tier.
Loli is bad. Porn is bad. You will not make edgy jokes about these subjects, or any other subjects I think are bad. They are unfunny, because Dear Leader says so, and he will huff, puff, and write "and everybody clapped" stories to justify himself.
>He lets hugboxes exist on bullshit Tumblr-tier pretexts.
His premises are "women don't have a place anywhere else" and "the women will leave if the mean incels bully them", when these are exactly the kind of users you don't want on the site because they will literally fucking kill it. Let the retards fight each other and have their gay sticker fights, it's free entertainment. His feminist heel turn seems mostly motivated by the fact Dear Reader is ronery. And because he's probably fucking one of the radfems.
>Null has a ballhugging coterie who follow him to give stickers and lick his taint.
I.e. the reason forums went extinct, since most normal people are repulsed by public display of homosexuality. This addiction to taint-licking just compounds on all the issues above. There is an entire gimp brigade who have the admin's profile open in a tab so they can clean his asshole with their tongues after each shitpost. Tell one of these catboy catamites to attempt heterosexuality and they will run crying to daddy Null.
>He bans users who are funnier than him.
Sigserv gave off a tremendous aura of pure animal sexuality and made credible terroristic threats, which explains why Null banned him: Sigserv is exactly the kind of user who would cuck Null.
His behavior isn't motivated by the fear of KiwiFarms ceasing to exist. His behavior is motivated by the fear of HIS KiwiFarms ceasing to exist. Null would rather have a world with no KiwiFarms at all than a world where he doesn't own it. Like the grifters he gets mad at, Null wants to be the Fuhrer of his own little dictatorship. Correspondingly, he gets into gay internet slapfights with various ecelebs fighting for the same turf (i.e. Ralph and Metokur). The personal investment Null has in these turf wars is blatantly obvious and manifests in genuine butthurt.
As for the community itself, it's a handful of funny guys in a sea of absolute mouthbreathing mongoloids, angry retards, sensitive spergs, wimpy wallflowers, and the kind of stuffy stick-up-the-ass prigs who killed SA.
The only reason he let registrations stay open during the 4chan invasion is because its collapse offers both (and an ability to preen the same way he did during SomethingAwful's various meltdowns). After the last few years of telling anons to go back to 4chan, suddenly Null is welcoming and proffering his dick to be sucked in their thread. The motives are transparent.
>He's a monomaniacal crank.
Nowadays, this mostly emerges on the issues of Islam, trannies, and the banking system. His objection to trannies isn't based on principle or the fact men in dresses are funny, it's because trannies almost killed his site. Instead of laughing at the angry men in dresses, nowadays he gets butthurt. "Trannies! Muslims! Pedos! Incels!" is his immediate buttmad response when he's losing an argument (which is often). He dresses up his egotistic response in moral language.
>He has a massive ego and will jettison past principles based on present whims.
His attitude on politics (>I hate politics/here's a political headline!) is schizophrenic and reactionary. His attitude shifts depending on whether he needs donations or not.
>His free speech beliefs are hypocritical.
When he's out shaking the donation cup, you're helping him stand up for free speech on the internet. When another site closes down, it's their fault for not being cool like him. But as soon as you disagree on one of Null's monomanias, he flips out, you get banned, and Null says "muh freezepeach" despite invoking the very same argument when no payment processor wants to deal with him.
>His attitude to offensive content is now 2013 SJW tier.
Loli is bad. Porn is bad. You will not make edgy jokes about these subjects, or any other subjects I think are bad. They are unfunny, because Dear Leader says so, and he will huff, puff, and write "and everybody clapped" stories to justify himself.
>He lets hugboxes exist on bullshit Tumblr-tier pretexts.
His premises are "women don't have a place anywhere else" and "the women will leave if the mean incels bully them", when these are exactly the kind of users you don't want on the site because they will literally fucking kill it. Let the retards fight each other and have their gay sticker fights, it's free entertainment. His feminist heel turn seems mostly motivated by the fact Dear Reader is ronery. And because he's probably fucking one of the radfems.
>Null has a ballhugging coterie who follow him to give stickers and lick his taint.
I.e. the reason forums went extinct, since most normal people are repulsed by public display of homosexuality. This addiction to taint-licking just compounds on all the issues above. There is an entire gimp brigade who have the admin's profile open in a tab so they can clean his asshole with their tongues after each shitpost. Tell one of these catboy catamites to attempt heterosexuality and they will run crying to daddy Null.
>He bans users who are funnier than him.
Sigserv gave off a tremendous aura of pure animal sexuality and made credible terroristic threats, which explains why Null banned him: Sigserv is exactly the kind of user who would cuck Null.
His behavior isn't motivated by the fear of KiwiFarms ceasing to exist. His behavior is motivated by the fear of HIS KiwiFarms ceasing to exist. Null would rather have a world with no KiwiFarms at all than a world where he doesn't own it. Like the grifters he gets mad at, Null wants to be the Fuhrer of his own little dictatorship. Correspondingly, he gets into gay internet slapfights with various ecelebs fighting for the same turf (i.e. Ralph and Metokur). The personal investment Null has in these turf wars is blatantly obvious and manifests in genuine butthurt.
As for the community itself, it's a handful of funny guys in a sea of absolute mouthbreathing mongoloids, angry retards, sensitive spergs, wimpy wallflowers, and the kind of stuffy stick-up-the-ass prigs who killed SA.
Null's unaddressed psychological issues guarantee he will eventually piss off his new userbase (Christian traditionalists, radical feminists, humorless spergs) when he relapses into his old behavior. Which he will, because:
- Null has no real principles.
- Null reflexively uses irony to mask serious butthurt.
- Null is incredibly thin-skinned beneath this irony.
- Null blows up at Mangosteen tier banter; he can dish it out, not take it.
- Null NEVER criticizes himself.
- Null retreats into self-pity and "the internet isn't serious guiz" when things get tough (usually because of some gay shit he started himself.)
- Null is the product of the father who abandoned him and the mother who neglected him.
- Null has done nothing to grow beyond those circumstances.
Null will make a mistake. And because of the userbase he has deliberately cultivated (i.e. tradcons,radfems, spergs), his mistake will have the exact same consequences as lowtax. The massive irony is that Null will see his "empire" spectacularly implode in the exact same way as lowtax did, for the same reasons Null called lowtax out for doing nearly a decade ago.
tl;dr: Null exhibits fatherless behavior, 0/10 would not have sex with.
Null is not Lowtax. Null will never be Lowtax. He is not going to have a dramatic fall, he'll just slink off the internet in the worst case scenario and never be heard from again.
Obscenity2022
Hellovan Onion
its also because the site is majority women and as we see from the new rules about profiles, he wants to make it more wamen friendly. calling it 2013 SJW is 100% true, if a fappenning happened today Null would ban anyone that posted that shit on the forum, but only the leaked nudes of women, the men is perfectly fine.
Its genuinely crazy looking at how vestigial a lot of the more male oriented parts of the site are, the ss13 gaming sessions somehow have less people in them vs 3 years ago, porn and anime went from something everyone loved back in 2017 to horribly offensive. 2/3rds of people under 50 are anti-israel but kiwifarms is the only place online that is anti-anti-israel now because Null got mocked too hard by Fuentes years ago.
that thread about the mods to "de-woke" games would never have gotten the amount of hate that it did if it was posted 4 years ago. in general stuff about gaming or anime has way fewer users even with the shot in the arm that 4chan refugees have became.
Ethan Klein doesn't look like a crackhead either, the CPS call had to be a trolling op /s
, Rekieta really should have tried that.
Last edited:
I think that has more to do with the userbase starting to become younger than anything to do with women. Young people online are starting to become more disdainful of video games, anime and sexual content.
Obscenity2022
Hellovan Onion
young people not liking anime? the only people i know that watch anime during their lunch breaks are in their 20s. this whole "based youth" faggotry is up there with "immigrants are natural conservatives" its mostly a myth based on weird boomers trying to talk to younger people and them not wanting to discuss that shit with them.
i remember in the bush era when people genuinely said "young people don't like smoking weed" either. Next you'll tell me young people don't vape or do nicotine pouches.
Kiwi Pot Pie
Remarkable Onion
Meh, Null just needs to keep running his MATI grift and drawing in other fatherless men who need an e-daddy. Whatever dick pics get leaked or dumb shit he does will be covered up like the nekoshota and all his many scams. His fanboys will ignore it until they find themselves on the wrong side of his tantrums. That is why Null obsesses over getting new blood for the forum since he keeps banning and driving off all the oldfags. Some are most likely sockpuppets and oldfags who got new accounts. Others are genuine newfags who found Null through MATI and had to join e-daddy's forum. The less said on how he recruits BP members the better but once Null has that terminal meltdown they will be the first to go.
Null's ultimate fate (assuming with a big assumption he isn't arrested for fraud, sued into oblivion, or somehow totally deplatformed thanks to alienating everyone who could help him) is to run a dead forum surrounded by a few hardcore cocksuckers. The web forum version of the sort of people who unironically enjoy Ethan Ralph and Nick Rekieta these days. He might act like Lowtax but he is too arrogant and prideful to kill himself. He shares a lot in common with Rekieta, right down to being a narcissist with self-diagnosed ODD (a diagnosis for children that is called Antisocial Personality Disorder in adults).
Obscenity2022
Hellovan Onion
no one really talks about how Null will just ban the few effortposters like Blav in the destiny thread or @The Gays From LA in the contra thread and how much his forum heavily relies on these people who go full Don Quixote and declare some lolcow their dragon to destroy and once he does that, for the most part it destroys discussion about these cows.
Contra has made millions and his hate thread barely gets posts on it meaning he has effectively "won"
it reminds me of how Ethan Klein has been at war with reddit for fucking months and his thread is dead because all the effortposters over there got the ban.
If it weren't for fucking Lidl carrying the Sam Hyde hate torch i doubt that thread would have any pushback either.
its like the 4chan leaks showed, one freak was doing most of the work maintaining the site for years. Without these wingnuts it all falls apart, and most of the time they're men instead of annoying ladies
Contra has made millions and his hate thread barely gets posts on it meaning he has effectively "won"
it reminds me of how Ethan Klein has been at war with reddit for fucking months and his thread is dead because all the effortposters over there got the ban.
If it weren't for fucking Lidl carrying the Sam Hyde hate torch i doubt that thread would have any pushback either.
its like the 4chan leaks showed, one freak was doing most of the work maintaining the site for years. Without these wingnuts it all falls apart, and most of the time they're men instead of annoying ladies
Blav is banned, but he just uses his new account StrangerMe. It is an open secret that it's Blav. StrangerMe acknowledges it. Other users acknowledge it. Even Destiny told WillyMac during his interview StrangerMe was obivously Blav.
Blav also likes to mock Destiny for being allegedly molested as child and said he deserved it. Josh likes to keep him around post-lawsuit (against Destiny) despite banning his previous account because he is an idiot who can't tell it's Blav or understands Blav is effective at antagonizing Destiny, reddit's newest public enemy number one, and is too prideful to unban his original account. (Making sock accounts is against the rules btw.)
Obscenity2022
Hellovan Onion
"its ok to laugh about child rape if its someone i dislike"
Gore San
⛧ Ć̸̢̧̧̲̰̣͙̖̟̜͕̖͓̣̱̮̣̙̯̜̮̖̣̙̓̑͊̊͋͗̌̐̍̋͋̎̉̓͒͑̀̕͝͝r̵̡̛̰̘͓͎̲͕̖͚͖͕͙̬̣͕̤̣̭̲̙͕͛͛̆̄̃͐̉͑̀̎̎̽͛͋̌̔́̈͘͘͜͝͝͝i̷̧̢̫̣̜͕̣̼̳͉̭͊͆m̷͔̼̠̖̮̪̽̈́͌͑̈͆̂́͌̑̑̿́̑̐͋͒̽͋̈́̃̇̎͑͒̔͌̿̒̐͑̽̍̎̑͗̿̕̕͝s̵̯̦̩̪̼̄̍̋̇̐̅̅͆̒̉̔͑̍̌̽̐͑̈́͐̎͛͆̐͊͂̏̔͒̚͘͝͝͠ò̸̢̮̭̋̋͋̐̍́͊̇̓̐̑̈̋̅̐̃̈́̃͆̎̐̆̀̎̓̃̒̌̎̕̚̚n̶̼̮̫̠̥̳̼̪̙̕
Staff member
edgy bastard
In b4 b& lol
Josh banished a thread I made into talk to staff and got into a heated agrument with me, thought maybe you guys might get a kick out of it, or might think i'm a sperg:
And people tell me I take the site too seriously.
And people tell me I take the site too seriously.
Last edited:
Obscenity2022
Hellovan Onion
i love how his entire argument is that you aren't a mod. if you were a mod you'd get away with it. Also how much of a retard do you have to be to pay for T&H and get a pink triangle?
Null would rather die than do something about bannings because most of them are because of slights against null, harder to get away with that if he had to put a reason down for each one
Lunar Magma
Remarkable Onion
I was an effortposter too before getting banned for "spam," whatever that means. Honestly, we may need to seriously consider the idea that Josh bans people out of jealousy. If you write better than him, if you're funnier, if you're more insightful. Any of these things. I doubt he would ever admit it, but due to his massive ego, he doesn't want to be outshined by anyone on the site. He's supposed to be the head honcho, supreme leader. And if someone is more liked or better at something he thinks he is, then he suffers narcissistic injury and breaks out the ban hammer. As one example, anytime Josh criticizes Metokur, it splits his MATI audience. Instantly, half of chat revolts against him 'cause they like Metokur more than Josh. And given the binary choice of Josh vs Metokur, most pick Metokur every time. Metokur has more natural charisma and thus, more simps. The squeaky, fat, short, voice-cracking Josh just can't compete. Not that Metokur is any better honestly. He's an ostensibly terminally-ill guy with breaking bones, wearing a clamshell brace for his crumbling spine and mostly sits in his recliner chair these days while worshipping Vtubers. Not exactly cool. But he used to be to his audience. Josh is your fat nerd friend but not someone you admire or want to be like. I mean, why would anyone? He's fat! So on any issue, fat Josh is giving his hot take and dude can't even control his eating addiction. I just don't respect his opinion. Like Josh will rant about how you must be feminist to get white women and how the incels won't reproduce. And I'm just thinking, "Bro you can't do a single pullup, let alone a muscle-up. You can't lecture me on anything. Do 10 pullups and get a six pack. That will show me you unlocked true discipline and strength." At best, a fat guy like Josh or Ashton Parks can be an entertainer or a clown. That is an acceptable role for a fat guy.
Youthful Shannel
An Onion Among Onions
Out of curiosity has Null ever given an explanation why Kiwi Farms needs $12,000 a month, or about $145,000 a year, to operate? It's a shitty web forum in the asshole of the internet that few people know or care about (and if they do know it's always dismissed as a doxing/hate site).
It couldn't be more obvious he needs this amount to finance his metamorphosis into Jocelyn, we all know it's true. The trannies biggest alogs are other trannies, and Josh is the biggest tranny of all. 
Off-topic, but have people gotten so fucking stupid over the years to where now every store that sells cigs and vapes have warning signs all over the fucking place saying how they have nicotine and nicotine is bad for you?
Like, yea no shit! Even the most braindead retard back in the day knew that, why does it need to be explicitly spelled out for people? The signs themselves aren't even subtle, they're just as gigantic as the cig/vape rack.
Mr. Blobby's Wild Ride
Registered Member
Joshua gives his thoughts on some youtube video by a political youtuber.
I actively watched and listened to the entire video.
His arguments run cover for basically every right-wing spook: immigration is bad, diversity is bad, DEI is bad, supporting Ukraine is bad, etc. His main thesis is that all of these points are a mere facade covering the greatest threat of all (which is definitely not a left-wing spook): Nazism and Putin, and that Putin has paid off popular creators to popularize Nazism so that the US is weakened.
He suffers tremendously from not addressing what I call 'presuppositions', which is a real word but I use it in a specific way. I realized as a teenager listening to Atheist vs. Creationist debates that there's no way to have a real productive conversation between those two groups because they cannot make their arguments in a way that is accepted by the opposition. This is because our knowledge is built on a stack of assumed truths I call presuppositions, and in conversation you expect your partner to presuppose certain things. In a disagreement, you will unwittingly analyze your presuppositions to find the most fundamental difference between yours and your partner's, then tackle that difference to try and convince them to realign with you. Consider the following:
"Evolution is real." "It is not, God created mankind in his image." "There is evidence of evolution." "The evidence is planted by the Devil." "There is no Devil." "The Devil is real, he is mentioned in the Bible." "The Bible is a collection of fairy tails." "The Bible is the truth." "It was written by fallible men." "It is the word of God." "There is no God." "God is real." <- That is the fundamental presuppositional difference, and it is so fundamental that these two parties cannot approach the topic of Creationism productively.
Left vs. Right dichotomy has become increasingly unhinged over the last 10 years and that is because the foundational presuppositional difference between the two sides has gotten so far apart that productive conversation is impossible.
Consider the stack of presuppositions that someone like LazerPig would have to break down to figure out the core difference between himself and an avowed antisemitic neo-Nazi. I believe i know what that difference is.
"Liberals" like LazerPig believe that: (1) things used to be ok, (2) things are better now, and (3) things will continue to be ok and get better.
"Conservative" normies believe that: (1) things used to be ok, (2) things are worse now, and (3) things could get better with some change.
"Extremists" believe that: (1) things used to be fucked, (2) things are really fucked, and (3) things will get so incredibly fucked.
I believe this is the fundamental difference, and it's because it is a presupposition based on how you feel. If you don't feel like things are OK, how you view a myriad of things is different. Same with your opinion of the recent past (esp before your lifetime that you did not experience) and optimism for the future. These three feelings dictate how you will analyze facts presented to you. LazerPig, and all men, build what they believe to be true based on how they feel about the trajectory of their society. If you feel like things are doing poorly, you will quickly realize you have very little in agreement with someone who feels things are doing quite well.
That is the core difference, and LazerPig falls very neatly alongside Destiny. I've previously said that Destiny is the political alignment he is because there is no other timeline where Destiny would be paid millions of dollars and offered an endless buffet of BPD pussy other than the timeline we currently live in. LazerPig, as a gross fat homosexual, is in an identical situation. That is why they love the status quo and want more of it.
If LazerPig allowed himself to think things are getting worse because of domestic policy, especially contemporary policy like mass immigration, then you open the door to reform. Radical change could result in their gravy train and bug chasing adventures ending in a mass grave under one of two red flags. For someone like him, he has to completely shut down any change. In order to be a gay bear backpacking and bugchasing across a worry-free Europe that is a stranger to war, Europe must remain liberal, it must be a part of NATO, and NATO must continue to dominate the entire world to maintain Pax Americana.
The mild conservative is willing to undo a lot of things, even if it means throwing out gay marriage and 30 million immigrants. That threatens the gay bathroom cruising and BPD pussy chasing lifestyles of LP & Destiny. The extremist will go so far as to say the wrong side won World War 2 and want to undo everything since the New Deal. That's an even bigger threat, which is why taking that position must be linked with the Holocaust and Russia (as these two spooks create the foundation for our understanding of our country's past and present).
This is also why I think so many young minorities become socialists under the Hasan banner. They don't believe that the past was OK, as believing the past was OK means that colonialism and racism was OK. As they're not from that era of our history, there's nothing of it they wish to conserve. So since they don't like the past, and no young person is doing well in the present, they turn to socialism.
This just feels like venting. He's trying to convince people that the status quo is a good thing, actually. Meanwhile, the young minds (dumb Timmy) is not debating minutia of how to help black people achieve more, or how to train police better: they're talking about either installing afro-centric communism vs. deporting every dark skinned person to Africa, or abolishing the police vs. instituting a police state to get rid of the mexicans. He concludes on saying "send me your pepe because I lost the culture war", which is true. He did.
His arguments run cover for basically every right-wing spook: immigration is bad, diversity is bad, DEI is bad, supporting Ukraine is bad, etc. His main thesis is that all of these points are a mere facade covering the greatest threat of all (which is definitely not a left-wing spook): Nazism and Putin, and that Putin has paid off popular creators to popularize Nazism so that the US is weakened.
He suffers tremendously from not addressing what I call 'presuppositions', which is a real word but I use it in a specific way. I realized as a teenager listening to Atheist vs. Creationist debates that there's no way to have a real productive conversation between those two groups because they cannot make their arguments in a way that is accepted by the opposition. This is because our knowledge is built on a stack of assumed truths I call presuppositions, and in conversation you expect your partner to presuppose certain things. In a disagreement, you will unwittingly analyze your presuppositions to find the most fundamental difference between yours and your partner's, then tackle that difference to try and convince them to realign with you. Consider the following:
"Evolution is real." "It is not, God created mankind in his image." "There is evidence of evolution." "The evidence is planted by the Devil." "There is no Devil." "The Devil is real, he is mentioned in the Bible." "The Bible is a collection of fairy tails." "The Bible is the truth." "It was written by fallible men." "It is the word of God." "There is no God." "God is real." <- That is the fundamental presuppositional difference, and it is so fundamental that these two parties cannot approach the topic of Creationism productively.
Left vs. Right dichotomy has become increasingly unhinged over the last 10 years and that is because the foundational presuppositional difference between the two sides has gotten so far apart that productive conversation is impossible.
Consider the stack of presuppositions that someone like LazerPig would have to break down to figure out the core difference between himself and an avowed antisemitic neo-Nazi. I believe i know what that difference is.
"Liberals" like LazerPig believe that: (1) things used to be ok, (2) things are better now, and (3) things will continue to be ok and get better.
"Conservative" normies believe that: (1) things used to be ok, (2) things are worse now, and (3) things could get better with some change.
"Extremists" believe that: (1) things used to be fucked, (2) things are really fucked, and (3) things will get so incredibly fucked.
I believe this is the fundamental difference, and it's because it is a presupposition based on how you feel. If you don't feel like things are OK, how you view a myriad of things is different. Same with your opinion of the recent past (esp before your lifetime that you did not experience) and optimism for the future. These three feelings dictate how you will analyze facts presented to you. LazerPig, and all men, build what they believe to be true based on how they feel about the trajectory of their society. If you feel like things are doing poorly, you will quickly realize you have very little in agreement with someone who feels things are doing quite well.
That is the core difference, and LazerPig falls very neatly alongside Destiny. I've previously said that Destiny is the political alignment he is because there is no other timeline where Destiny would be paid millions of dollars and offered an endless buffet of BPD pussy other than the timeline we currently live in. LazerPig, as a gross fat homosexual, is in an identical situation. That is why they love the status quo and want more of it.
If LazerPig allowed himself to think things are getting worse because of domestic policy, especially contemporary policy like mass immigration, then you open the door to reform. Radical change could result in their gravy train and bug chasing adventures ending in a mass grave under one of two red flags. For someone like him, he has to completely shut down any change. In order to be a gay bear backpacking and bugchasing across a worry-free Europe that is a stranger to war, Europe must remain liberal, it must be a part of NATO, and NATO must continue to dominate the entire world to maintain Pax Americana.
The mild conservative is willing to undo a lot of things, even if it means throwing out gay marriage and 30 million immigrants. That threatens the gay bathroom cruising and BPD pussy chasing lifestyles of LP & Destiny. The extremist will go so far as to say the wrong side won World War 2 and want to undo everything since the New Deal. That's an even bigger threat, which is why taking that position must be linked with the Holocaust and Russia (as these two spooks create the foundation for our understanding of our country's past and present).
This is also why I think so many young minorities become socialists under the Hasan banner. They don't believe that the past was OK, as believing the past was OK means that colonialism and racism was OK. As they're not from that era of our history, there's nothing of it they wish to conserve. So since they don't like the past, and no young person is doing well in the present, they turn to socialism.
This just feels like venting. He's trying to convince people that the status quo is a good thing, actually. Meanwhile, the young minds (dumb Timmy) is not debating minutia of how to help black people achieve more, or how to train police better: they're talking about either installing afro-centric communism vs. deporting every dark skinned person to Africa, or abolishing the police vs. instituting a police state to get rid of the mexicans. He concludes on saying "send me your pepe because I lost the culture war", which is true. He did.
If you're wondering why Josh hasn't been dilating on X, he said on MATI he was banned for celebrating harm on Congressman Mitch McConnell. He appealed 3 days ago and is still waiting.
TheCIAGlowsInTheDark
Hellovan Onion
Jersh, no one watches online debates for the actual facts, it's to see who can roast each other better. Every filmed debate on the Internet (since the creation of websites like Youtube and Dailymotion and so on) have always been gladiator blood sports to see which side of a debate can roast each other better on stage.
In fact even Kiwi Farms is guilty of this too because whenever a controversial topic pops up on Kiwi Farms, half the of the Kiwis call each other faggots rather than caring about being objective on who is actually objectively right; I see far too many of the Kiwis being incapable in not resorting to gish galloping (basically bringing up stupid questions to overwhelm your opponent in a debate so that you can "win" a debate and this is very dishonest), red herrings (they always find a way to make it about the Jews or troons somehow), ad hominem attacks (the classic calling someone a 'faggot' or a 'cuck' with usually no real argument to back it up), and blind appeal to authority (like blindly using religion to argue for or against something as well as praising badly written laws your average Kiwi finds "Based" and never mind the ethics).
It takes a lot longer to refute a stupid argument than it does to make said stupid argument which is why some dishonest people will gish gallop knowing fully well an argument is timed and their opponent doesn't have enough time to refute said dumbass argument, bringing up irrelevant shit in an argument (like troons) is not a winning argument, calling someone a faggot because you're losing an argument is a classic case of 'Feels Over Reals' (how you feel about anything is subjective and learn to take the L when you're losing), arguments from religion are usually weak ass arguments that it's easy for someone much more educated can easily look at almost any arguments from religion and tear them to shreds, and ethics doesn't come from law (if this was the case then genocide being legal in some countries would be seen as ethical then; good luck trying to convince a sane person that genocide being legal in some parts of the world is somehow ethical).
Jersh isn't wrong when he says that online debates are usually just slapfights (nobody really watches post-debates featuring actual experts that know their stuff that can fact check both sides for a reason because to your average person the charts and facts are not as interesting compared to two guys on stage hurling insults at each other) but Jersh and the Kiwis are not free of this midwittery either where Kiwi Farms does the same thing with just about any controversial topic they discuss.
In fact even Kiwi Farms is guilty of this too because whenever a controversial topic pops up on Kiwi Farms, half the of the Kiwis call each other faggots rather than caring about being objective on who is actually objectively right; I see far too many of the Kiwis being incapable in not resorting to gish galloping (basically bringing up stupid questions to overwhelm your opponent in a debate so that you can "win" a debate and this is very dishonest), red herrings (they always find a way to make it about the Jews or troons somehow), ad hominem attacks (the classic calling someone a 'faggot' or a 'cuck' with usually no real argument to back it up), and blind appeal to authority (like blindly using religion to argue for or against something as well as praising badly written laws your average Kiwi finds "Based" and never mind the ethics).
It takes a lot longer to refute a stupid argument than it does to make said stupid argument which is why some dishonest people will gish gallop knowing fully well an argument is timed and their opponent doesn't have enough time to refute said dumbass argument, bringing up irrelevant shit in an argument (like troons) is not a winning argument, calling someone a faggot because you're losing an argument is a classic case of 'Feels Over Reals' (how you feel about anything is subjective and learn to take the L when you're losing), arguments from religion are usually weak ass arguments that it's easy for someone much more educated can easily look at almost any arguments from religion and tear them to shreds, and ethics doesn't come from law (if this was the case then genocide being legal in some countries would be seen as ethical then; good luck trying to convince a sane person that genocide being legal in some parts of the world is somehow ethical).
Jersh isn't wrong when he says that online debates are usually just slapfights (nobody really watches post-debates featuring actual experts that know their stuff that can fact check both sides for a reason because to your average person the charts and facts are not as interesting compared to two guys on stage hurling insults at each other) but Jersh and the Kiwis are not free of this midwittery either where Kiwi Farms does the same thing with just about any controversial topic they discuss.
Last edited: