It was particularly retarded of Josh to demand the footage from Rackets. Why would Nick incriminate himself like that when it seems to be valid by his own admission? I get people on Nick's thread want to laugh at the lolcow, but won't this all be public record eventually anyway? Some adult needs to step in tell everyone "lol, calm down."
And why would Josh even care even if Nick claimed the cops did plant something? Nick was clearly high as balls streaming. We saw the coke. He was clearly getting blown under the desk by his whore. There are multiple witnesses saying he did massive amounts of drugs, including the spaghetti-o cuck. Even if Nick made his claim, there is so much undeniable evidence to the contrary that it all becomes absolutely ridiculous.. Again, why would Josh choose this to argue about?
Plus let's not forget Nick basically admitted his home was a complete shithole in court because him and his wife would rather get wasted then do dishes or take care of the kids. Josh is really picking retarded arguments here and gave Nick and easy win for it.
And, by the way, everyone should be absolutely pissed that Nick got his kids back. He clearly has shown no signs of change. Nick said, "It should terrify you how easy it was." Why even say that unless he is also admitting he shouldn't have gotten them back?
All of these autistic rants Rackets goes on about are getting really tiresome. Oh, the government is fucking him over? Why, Nick? Is it because you believe you have the right to get as high and drunk as you want to and neglect your kids? Imagine if he kills someone in a DUI. What's he going to say? "Well it was still my right to get drunk and drive. The stupid government wants me to care about the person who died, but they're a bunch of corrupt assholes intent on fucking me over..."
And why would Josh even care even if Nick claimed the cops did plant something? Nick was clearly high as balls streaming. We saw the coke. He was clearly getting blown under the desk by his whore. There are multiple witnesses saying he did massive amounts of drugs, including the spaghetti-o cuck. Even if Nick made his claim, there is so much undeniable evidence to the contrary that it all becomes absolutely ridiculous.. Again, why would Josh choose this to argue about?
Plus let's not forget Nick basically admitted his home was a complete shithole in court because him and his wife would rather get wasted then do dishes or take care of the kids. Josh is really picking retarded arguments here and gave Nick and easy win for it.
And, by the way, everyone should be absolutely pissed that Nick got his kids back. He clearly has shown no signs of change. Nick said, "It should terrify you how easy it was." Why even say that unless he is also admitting he shouldn't have gotten them back?
All of these autistic rants Rackets goes on about are getting really tiresome. Oh, the government is fucking him over? Why, Nick? Is it because you believe you have the right to get as high and drunk as you want to and neglect your kids? Imagine if he kills someone in a DUI. What's he going to say? "Well it was still my right to get drunk and drive. The stupid government wants me to care about the person who died, but they're a bunch of corrupt assholes intent on fucking me over..."
Last edited:
