• Welcome to Onionfarms. All races, ethnicities, religions. Gay, straight, bisexual. CIS or trans. It makes no difference to us. If you can rock with us, you are one of us. We are here for you and always will be.
  • Onionfarms.net (Our social network site powered by Humhub).Register and up your own little space to chat and hang out in.
Joshua Moon the owner of Kiwifarms
People have mentioned it before on here, but that Synthetic Man thread is a good example of how Kiwi Farms is nothing but Null nut-huggers and teenagers who joined in the past two months. So many pink join dates.
Before Synthetic man started picking a fight with Jewsh, the thread actually had productive and engaging discussion, (at least by modern KF standards) but now it's just a bunch of Jewsh dickriders bitching about lolicon and repeating Jewsh's arguments like broken records. If Jewsh mass banned his sycophants the quality of the site would increase tenfold, but then it'd be a Ghost Town.
 
null 1.pngnull 2.png
Null stuck his nose into Sharty drama and got it slapped.
 
Who coined the term "phonebooking"? I bet their gay.
Close, as I recall it was something that came out of one of KF’s LGBT detractors.


Edit:

Found the thread where KF argued and debated the word to use for doxxing.

IMG_5367.jpeg

https://kiwifarms.st/threads/doxing-in-2025.208564/page-35

I think phonebooking won because someone else who has it out for kiwifarms used/uses it and their audience endorses/approves of it.

Oh yeah. “Someone else who has it out for kiwifarms.” Liz Fong-Jones fits that description too.

IMG_5364.jpeg

My memory has null , I think, saying to use phonebooking so that if it’s wrong when KF does it then it’s wrong when LFJ does it, too.

But here’s a take from “retired staff”

https://archive.is/q12BV

>We will still be the uber mega doXXXXXXXXXXing site no matter what we call it.

IMG_5363.jpeg

>doesn't matter, no matter what retard euphemism we come up for it, it will just be considered a pathetic, desperate attempt to avoid the previous word. And that's what it will be. Because language does not actually allow you just to make up replacement words.

>Everyone knows your new fake word just means exactly the same thing as the last word.

IMG_5365.jpeg

>Be creative, bitches. The dumbass nigger who runs the site has forbidden the real word. Just XXX the fuck out of some fuckin niggas, just don't call it that.

IMG_5366.jpeg

(Your honor my client is innocent, you see there’s no specific law on the books against “un-aliving.”)

I got bored with the spitballing and semantics on p.46 and stopped reading there.
 
Last edited:
The funny part is phone books also are posting private information, that can be opt out of. If he is going to use the term he better let the lolcows pay to have their articles removed.
He once let Coach Dead Pill censor his own thread and another time removed the thread on Donnie Long in exchange for Donnie turning over "evidence" on Sam "Vordrak" Smith (and then undeleted the thread when Donnie went to prison). If the right offer is made, Josh won't refuse like you better believe if a troon offered him money to censor or delete a thread in exchange for some damning evidence or other way to silence Liz Fong Jones then Josh would gladly accept.
 
He once let Coach Dead Pill censor his own thread and another time removed the thread on Donnie Long in exchange for Donnie turning over "evidence" on Sam "Vordrak" Smith (and then undeleted the thread when Donnie went to prison). If the right offer is made, Josh won't refuse like you better believe if a troon offered him money to censor or delete a thread in exchange for some damning evidence or other way to silence Liz Fong Jones then Josh would gladly accept.
Let the thread bidding commence. It's like eBay but black mail. Also do it for banning and unbanning.
 
Close, as I recall it was something that came out of one of KF’s LGBT detractors.


Edit:

Found the thread where KF argued and debated the word to use for doxxing.

View attachment 90598

https://kiwifarms.st/threads/doxing-in-2025.208564/page-35

I think phonebooking won because someone else who has it out for kiwifarms used/uses it and their audience endorses/approves of it.

Oh yeah. “Someone else who has it out for kiwifarms.” Liz Fong-Jones fits that description too.

View attachment 90595

My memory has null , I think, saying to use phonebooking so that if it’s wrong when KF does it then it’s wrong when LFJ does it, too.

But here’s a take from “retired staff”

https://archive.is/q12BV

>We will still be the uber mega doXXXXXXXXXXing site no matter what we call it.

View attachment 90594

>doesn't matter, no matter what retard euphemism we come up for it, it will just be considered a pathetic, desperate attempt to avoid the previous word. And that's what it will be. Because language does not actually allow you just to make up replacement words.

>Everyone knows your new fake word just means exactly the same thing as the last word.

View attachment 90596

>Be creative, bitches. The dumbass nigger who runs the site has forbidden the real word. Just XXX the fuck out of some fuckin niggas, just don't call it that.

View attachment 90597

(Your honor my client is innocent, you see there’s no specific law on the books against “un-aliving.”)

I got bored with the spitballing and semantics on p.46 and stopped reading there.
It should also be worth further noting that the reason why Jersh and the Kiwis have adopted the term "Phonebooking" is because of the potential legal liabilities that now apply to Kiwi Farms (and other communities that are just like them) as now and days some American states have made doxing a crime (it's either classified as a misdemeanor or a felony depending on the jurisdiction).

While there are currently no federal laws against doxing, a sizable number of states have since classified doxing as a form on online crime as more people demand more legislation that addresses cybersecurity and online privacy in recent years.

The following states that have made doxing as a crime in their own jurisdictions are California, Nevada, Utah, Kentucky, Missouri, Alabama, Virginia, Florida, Arizona, Oregon, Illinois, and Connecticut with Georgia now seeking their own legislation against doxing as well.

To make matters worse for Kiwi Farms (and other communities like them), there are at least three states in America that not only made doxing a crime but also allows their residents to sue a doxer (be it an individual or an online platform) in civil court over damages done by doxing.

These states are California, Nevada, and Illinois where they grant their residents a right of action (the power to sue someone in civil court) over damages done from said doxing (so you can see that Jersh has a reason to be scared of a potential lawsuit should any of these three states go after Kiwi Farms).

Do states screw over online content creators without getting the federal government involved? The answer is a big 'Yes' and we've seen this twice with two high profile individuals; Ethan Ralph and Alex Jones.

In the case of Ethan Ralph, he was charged and convicted for posting revenge porn of his ex-girlfriend in his home state of Virginia (by that time, Virginia already criminalized revenge porn) and while there are no federal laws against revenge porn at the time, the Gunt still got screwed over this stunt and he has never been the same since (it got to the point where he had to flee to Mexico for a while in an attempt to escape his legal troubles).

Then we have the case of Alex Jones. While there are no federal defamation laws, the states over the decades have legislated such defamation laws. Connecticut doesn't have any defamation laws but Texas does and Alex Jones lives in Texas where the Sandy Hook families filed a defamation lawsuit against Alex Jones in his own home state and they won their case and now Alex Jones has to pay the families those billions of dollars over what he said about the Sandy Hook Shooting over a decade ago.

So should someone living in California, Nevada, or Illinois sue Jersh; unlike the many lolsuits that have targeted Kiwi farms over the years, a doxing lawsuit from any of those three states would most likely stick and spell the end for Kiwi Farms because those states have not only recognized doxing as a crime but they also allows their residents to take legal action against their doxers in civil court.

This is why they now use the term "Phonebooking" as an attempt to starve off any legal liabilities that now apply to Kiwi Farms these days. This isn't the 2010's anymore back when governments were still behind legalization for the Internet and these days governments are starting to catch up with the times.

Jersh has a valid reason to be scared and he adopted the term 'Phonebooking" for this reason because he's afraid he may end up like Ethan Ralph or Alex Jones someday.
 
Last edited:
So should someone living in California, Nevada, or Illinois sue Jersh; unlike the many lolsuits that have targeted Kiwi farms over the years, a doxing lawsuit from any of those three states would most likely stick and spell the end for Kiwi Farms because those states have not only recognized doxing a a crime but they also allows their residents to take legal action against their doxers in civil court.
neat I’m in California and had no idea , thanks
 
This is why they now use the term "Phonebooking" as an attempt to starve off any legal liabilities that now apply to Kiwi Farms these days. This isn't the 2010's anymore back when governments were still behind legalization for the Internet and these days governments are starting to catch up with the times.

Jersh has a valid reason to be scared and he adopted the term 'Phonebooking" for this reason because he's afraid he may end up like Ethan Ralph or Alex Jones someday.
And it is retarded and won't work for the reason Kiwi Farms addict AnOminous states in that screencap. Not a single judge will buy the argument that phonebooking =/= doxing. Especially not when there is a giant thread where Josh seethes at his users for daring to question his gay euphemism. Any lawsuit against KF over doxing will be tossed out on its merits, not because a judge decided that phonebooking is totally different from doxing and thus okay.

It is exceptionally obvious even to a non-lawyer that renaming a crime does not make it legal. If this advice came from Matthew Hardin, than I encourage Josh to find a different lawyer ASAP. Mend that bridge with Rekieta, he knows some good drug hookups and can score some sweet deals on the meth Josh is using to lose weight.
 
It should also be worth further noting that the reason why Jersh and the Kiwis have adopted the term "Phonebooking" is because of the potential legal liabilities that now apply to Kiwi Farms (and other communities that are just like them) as now and days some American states have made doxing a crime (it's either classified as a misdemeanor or a felony depending on the jurisdiction).

While there are currently no federal laws against doxing, a sizable number of states have since classified doxing as a form on online crime as more people demand more legislation that addresses cybersecurity and online privacy in recent years.

The following states that have made doxing as a crime in their own jurisdictions are California, Nevada, Utah, Kentucky, Missouri, Alabama, Virginia, Florida, Arizona, Oregon, Illinois, and Connecticut with Georgia now seeking their own legislation against doxing as well.

To make matters worse for Kiwi Farms (and other communities like them), there are at least three states in America that not only made doxing a crime but also allows their residents to sue a doxer (be it an individual or an online platform) in civil court over damages done by doxing.

These states are California, Nevada, and Illinois where they grant their residents a right of action (the power to sue someone in civil court) over damages done from said doxing (so you can see that Jersh has a reason to be scared of a potential lawsuit should any of these three states go after Kiwi Farms).

Do states screw over online content creators without getting the federal government involved? The answer is a big 'Yes' and we've seen this twice with two high profile individuals; Ethan Ralph and Alex Jones.

In the case of Ethan Ralph, he was charged and convicted for posting revenge porn of his ex-girlfriend in his home state of Virginia (by that time, Virginia already criminalized revenge porn) and while there are no federal laws against revenge porn at the time, the Gunt still got screwed over this stunt and he has never been the same since (it got to the point where he had to flee to Mexico for a while in an attempt to escape his legal troubles).

Then we have the case of Alex Jones. While there are no federal defamation laws, the states over the decades have passed such defamation laws. Connecticut doesn't have any defamation laws but Texas does and Alex Jones lives in Texas where the Sandy Hook families filed a defamation lawsuit against Alex Jones in his own home state and they won and now Alex Jones has to pay the families those billions of dollars over what he said about the Sandy Hook Shooting over a decade ago.

So should someone living in California, Nevada, or Illinois sue Jersh; unlike the many lolsuits that have targeted Kiwi farms over the years, a doxing lawsuit from any of those three states would most likely stick and spell the end for Kiwi Farms because those states have not only recognized doxing a a crime but they also allows their residents to take legal action against their doxers in civil court.

This is why they now use the term "Phonebooking" as an attempt to starve off any legal liabilities that now apply to Kiwi Farms these days. This isn't the 2010's anymore back when governments were still behind legalization for the Internet and these days governments are starting to catch up with the times.

Jersh has a valid reason to be scared and he adopted the term 'Phonebooking" for this reason because he's afraid he may end up like Ethan Ralph or Alex Jones someday.
Those wastoids can call it "phonebooking" or whatever the fuck all they want, it's still going to be the main reason why KF is widely disliked and looked down upon by pretty much everyone, even the New Right. All and any legal trouble KF has attracted over the years is mainly due to doxxing. It's indicative of how genuinely braindead Jersh is that he'd rather pearl clutch about "redefining" doxxing instead of forbidding it altogether like any normal person would.
 
Some thoughts on the latest MATI:
https://rumble.com/v6t678l-mad-at-the-internet-may-9th-2025.html?e9s=src_v1_ucp
@49:10 - Josh is excited for Europa Universalis 5. He loves EU4 and has 2000 hours in the game. Ok, that's cool but why do you defecate on 4x strategy games like Civilization and Age of Wonders, saying that only Destiny and trannies play those. I'm pretty sure 4x games are quite similar to the grand strategy map painting games you like or share some elements.
@55min - Rare based Josh moment. Josh gets mad at this bitch-ass pussy Geno Samuel, whose life is to document Chrischan. Geno accepted that Chrischan struck him down with DMCA and will quietly move on from making his content about that subject. Geno was animating Chris-chan's Sonichu comics. Weird that Chrischan is touchy about people using his stuff when everything he has ever done is a ripoff of usually mashing Sonic and Pokemon together, which are valid copyrighted properties that he does not own. You can tell that Josh is mad at Chrischan or at least mad at DMCA copyright laws. Josh goes off on Geno Samuel and calls him a cuck.
@2:00:54 - "If you don't have sex with people you don't wanna have a relationship with, you never have these issues. Your kids never test positive for cocaine. You never get accused of rape. I've been internet-man for 13 fucking years and has never been accused of rape. You know how many times I've been accused of sexual misconduct? Zero. You know why? I'm not a fucking retard. I don't have sex with random women. I don't solicit 18 year olds to meet me at Brony conventions so I can have sex with them."
Josh, you are fat, short, and ugly. You don't have the option to have sex with your fans. I mean, sure there are probably a couple 1/10 fat BPD hoes on your site that would take you. But in general, this is not something you have to worry about bc you are not attractive. Although I can't wait until some slag like Lidl Drip comes out in 2 years and posts a blog about how she felted raped and awkward after having a sexual relationship with the owner of Kiwi Farms.
@3:36:18-3:38:35 - Josh actually has a sensible take here on the topic of loli. Basically that it is protected free speech and that few people in Amerca would ever get prosecuted for it unless they've also got CSAM or are depicting a real-life minor with a name and identity. So Josh has gone back to the correct position that he used to hold back in his 8chan imageboard days. But in recent years, he has gone more male feminist and Puritan in his views on the subject. So it's refreshing to see him coming home to the correct position and coming full circle. A lot of his current views in the last couple years were simply overreactions to his own shotacon gooner Blocklands past, where he was gooning to shotacon and writing murder-fantasies about how he wanted to anally rape some girl to death (Stocking) who rejected him and murder all women before getting gunned down by a SWAT team. So when people hear this, they immediately assume Josh's a psychotic incel rapist misogynist pedophile. So then Josh goes into the opposite direction to attone for this past. Male feminist. TERF. Praise women. Shit on men. Shit on incels. Shit on loli/shota. It's just virtue-signaling basically.
 
2:00:54 - "If you don't have sex with people you don't wanna have a relationship with, you never have these issues. Your kids never test positive for cocaine. You never get accused of rape. I've been internet-man for 13 fucking years and has never been accused of rape. You know how many times I've been accused of sexual misconduct? Zero. You know why? I'm not a fucking retard. I don't have sex with random women. I don't solicit 18 year olds to meet me at Brony conventions so I can have sex with them."
The TERF brain rot goes so deep he now thinks having sex outside of the context of a long term relationship merits being accused of rape.
Somehow I think if he wasn't a male feminist incel he'd have a different view on this.
 
You don't have the option to have sex with your fans. I mean, sure there are probably a couple 1/10 fat BPD hoes on your site that would take you. B in general, this is not something you have to worry about bc you are not attractive. Although I can't wait until some slag like Lidl Drip comes out in 2 years and posts a blog about how she felted raped and awkward after having a sexual relationship with the owner of Kiwi Farms.
Jocelyn has such a low opinion of himself, he would never lower himself to fuck someone dumb enough to find him attractive. This is why he prefers findom relationship with Asian man.

A lot of his current views in the last couple years were simply overreactions to his own shotacon gooner Blocklands past, where he was gooning to shotacon and writing murder-fantasies about how he wanted to anally rape some girl to death (Stocking) who rejected him and murder all women before getting gunned down by a SWAT team. So when people hear this, they immediately assume Josh's a psychotic incel rapist misogynist pedophile. So then Josh goes into the opposite direction to attone for this past. Male feminist. TERF. Praise women. Shit on men. Shit on incels. Shit on loli/shota. It's just virtue-signaling basically.
Soft disagree, the shota allegations have been following him around for years and he hasn't cared before, he has become a terf because terfs give him positive attention on twitter.
 
Let the thread bidding commence. It's like eBay but black mail. Also do it for banning and unbanning.
honestly if Null did a "unban No questions asked" drive, i bet he'd have a few users coming crawling back. @bear computer is one of them.
So should someone living in California, Nevada, or Illinois sue Jersh; unlike the many lolsuits that have targeted Kiwi farms over the years, a doxing lawsuit from any of those three states would most likely stick and spell the end for Kiwi Farms because those states have not only recognized doxing a a crime but they also allows their residents to take legal action against their doxers in civil court.
well thankfully its not like there's a guy like Destiny who not only had his porn hosted on the farms (without an age gate) but tons of other details that clearly heavily played a role in his reputation getting hit. And beyond that its not like there are tons of trannies or their supporters in california who would love to fuck over the farms.

oh wait.
Any lawsuit against KF over doxing will be tossed out on its merits
what about revenge porn?
So it's refreshing to see him coming home to the correct position and coming full circle
literally the only reason he's backpedaled is because of laws that will be signed into federal law that will fuck over his site and were called "the anti-child porn act" or something insane.


ironic thread for that to be posted in, the T&H crowd hated the guy so they did the same thing to him like they did to Toji and accused him baselessly of being a lolicon and banned him for literally predicting such a law would get passed, pretty sure in the porn thread or some other parts of the site he literally calls it out by name too. But they make a call out thread and ban him over night.
I still maintain that he backed them up partially because he hoped it would lead to A&H being pushed offsite. Considering what the average poster is like now, I think he's mostly gotten his wish.
Its fucking awful how retarded users are now, they're all clutching their pearls hard too, like some war movie came out last month and they said it was evil because it showed porn, but it turns out by porn they literally just mean a generic music video from the bush era 2000s. like the women are more covered up than the nuns in the current year. Like that's where we stand now, the kiwifarms users are somehow more conservative than even the church ladies of the 2000s
 
Its fucking awful how retarded users are now, they're all clutching their pearls hard too, like some war movie came out last month and they said it was evil because it showed porn, but it turns out by porn they literally just mean a generic music video from the bush era 2000s. like the women are more covered up than the nuns in the current year. Like that's where we stand now, the kiwifarms users are somehow more conservative than even the church ladies of the 2000s
Was it this?

From the reaction you describe I can't tell if it was the BP hags or the trad incels. Can you find the thread?
 
Back
Top Bottom