The "old internet" in the 90s was more decentralised, and people were fine to self host stuff because nobody really was all that security conscious, bad actors hadn't realised what power they hadNuh uh!! In 2004, kilobaud mac os port 80 *smug face*Yeah but that's not what we're talking about.But here's what wikipedia says!!!Uhhh.. okayyOu rEaLlY pAiNtED yOurSElF inTo aCorNer
No, most people didn't have connectivity required to host a website on their desktop PC in 1998 or "the 90s".
The "old internet" was exactly as I remember it, the university E3 was bitchin fast and you could host anything on it. No, I actually tried that in 2004, at home, on my own cable Internet service, and it was not realistic for a variety of reasons. Nuh uhh I was talkin bout 1998 boy! Arch BTW! It was even more unrealistic in 1998 than it was in 2004, because people didn't have the connectivity required. I was directly involved in it!! You don't know shit bro!!!111!!one!!one1 *tries to describe how modems work* Everybody had 56k bro, and if you got rich parents like me you could even get 128k ISDN! 128k BITS not baud bitches!! In America (I'm not from there and know nothing about) people could even get 1 mbit cable!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! megabit!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!111oneoneone Everybody doin it broooooooooo!!!!!!!!!1!!111!!!!!!!!You're making bullshit arguments because you want to be right, also here is a detailed list of what your Internet connectivity options were in America in 1998 and note that none of them outside of a T-carrier were going to work very well for self hosting, and let's be realistic the everyday American doesn't have that, and most are stuck with dialup. *Trashcan given* gee guys @polonium sure likes painting himself into corners lmao. I got a chip on muh shoulder because everybody else is Josh. Not even close lol Nuh uhh actually application layer is bits per second duhhh also 56k was analog both ends because the phone company was digital on the inside hurr durrrrrrr!1 you don't no shit bitch, keep sucking Jimmy's dick lololololololol also people were doing whatever they want on the university network also we don't need no phone lines to get back Ye Old Innernette! You British or something because in America we don't have "-ue" or E-carriers or government creeps scanning for unauthorized television reception. *meme about wikipedia* Holy false prophets! Josh ain't banning his brightest now is he?
Ok joshNo, most people didn't have connectivity required to host a website on their desktop PC in 1998 or "the 90s".
So @polonium, when and where did I say that we need analog phone lines to replicate the Internet as it existed in the 90s? Also how's London these days?
You're a massive faggot. Please go back to yiffing with underage boys on KF
He sent you, didn't he? Enjoy corner time.
Is that Joshua, but with Downs?
The nice thing about Down's is it makes the FAS less noticeable
New lifehack for FAS babies?
OK boomer @Null
Ok, furry pedophile
No, I was posting in both places with the same username for ages before I got banned. Openly roasting josh here and on the farms is why I got banned.
In other words, you were banned for the same reason the kike faggot who put you in the corner was.
You've found yourself in a debate heavily on the side of a jewish furry pedophile against someone whose greatest crime is being Anglo. Very interesting.
>Fellow Whites posting
Daniel Lopez, pedophile, what have you contributed to this world, or even this website?
I can't explain @Moontroon begging for attention, but @Gargamel has been seething low-key since he found out I've been in a long term relationship for decades whereas by his own admission every male he meets just treats him like a wet hole for the night. It appears to chap his cheeks something fierce.
Yeah, but you're literally a jewish furry pedophile. Jason Wynn has never lied to me
He should try meeting a nice boy at temple instead of closing time at the gay bar like a bottom tier fat slut
