Boobie Bomb
An Onion Among Onions
I don't think it's illegal to create orgu ears. Maybe the face could look differentSounds like a challenge to me.
I don't think it's illegal to create orgu ears. Maybe the face could look differentSounds like a challenge to me.
The face is perfect thoughI don't think it's illegal to create orgu ears. Maybe the face could look different
We don't send people to weinerville because they say stupid things.
First off:Because that's who they are, boomers who got kicked out of the Trump reddit clone for saying N.
Well, not everyone agrees. I have to defend Freya here, she's right, it's not a universal age limit. Not in the US, and only four countries in Europe have an age of consent higher than 16. You can shit on Destiny and Warski for grooming teens especially when it's illegal in the states they reside in but not every 21 year old that hooks up/marries a 16 or 17 year old is a pedo, and equating it to sexual abuse of pre-pubescent literal children is a bridge too far.
Don't justify a ban saying its illegal conduct when its not in most places.
I was in the wrong as well. I posted this while I was drinking my coffee at Honeydew Donuts. And it is only fitting that I apologize to you and others as well. I know you are trying to do your job and it is especially hard in these gray areas as well.Well how about next time when you're in the discord with us and I explain a 24-hour ban AT LENGTH, you say something before the 24 hours is over?
You had the power of the entire time to unban Ishtar. It seems to me like you let me go ahead with the ban, and because it wasn't popular you're going to pretend like you're mad at me over it now that the ban is over.
You knew I banned Ishtar. You did nothing. You said nothing. You let the ban wrap up. And now you're pretending like you're upset that she got banned.
This was not something that went over your head and under your nose. I gave you the Iggy about this the second I did it. I told you here and I told you in one of our DMs. Don't tell me you didn't check either of those alerts.
View attachment 98594
View attachment 98596
You knew on discord and you knew on here. Look at where I told you on staff chats right after I banned her. Literally the next response is you.
@Ishtar I was reactionary and I apologize and I will loosen up on the moderation style, and next time I'll make it more clear if I'm trying to get you to steer away from a subject or if I'm trying to just win an argument. Because it wasn't about me proving myself right I was trying to get you to stop and you wouldn't stop. There's a lot of scrutiny right now and there's a lot of scrutiny on the horizon, so we need to stay away from topics like that unless it's an obvious joke.
And to everybody I'm sorry about being such a tight ass. My apologies about the Ishtar ban, I was wrong on that one and I'm an adult enough to admit that I fucked up.
Warski is part of Kino Casino, which is funded by An Open Secret producer and hedge fund manager Gabe Hoffman. Hoffman also likely finances MATI and Kiwifarms.Ok I’m not getting this Destiny thing. So Destiny sexts a 16 yr old, bad
But Andy sexts a 17 yr old, good? It’s a one year difference, how come Destiny is weird but Warski is fine, where’s the consistency? Destiny gets a community feature but Warski dosent
We are not advocating anything illegal. We are not actively conspiring to allow 40 year olds to cross state lines to fuck a 16 year old. We are not rewriting legal codes for the feds or the state. It is a discussion board. If someone on their off-time decides they want to cross state lines and fuck a 16 year old and are caught, it's their problem, not ours.First off:
"Federal law mandates that individuals must be at least 18 to consent to sexual activity if the activity involves interstate travel or online communication with a minor. This means that even if a state's age of consent is lower than 18, the federal standard will apply in specific cases."
Federal law overrides state law. I don't give a shit what places are late to the party of making the age of consent 18, because what is legal isn't always moral and what is moral isn't always legal. If an adult crosses state or country lines to meet a 16 year old for sex that is still a sex crime and it is sex trafficking to take a minor to a place where it is legal to fuck them for a reason. And let's not act like that is meant to allow 40 year olds to fuck 16 year olds because it's clearly meant to be for the Romeo and Juliet laws. This is not the hill to die on and it's off topic. Advocating for doing both illegal and morally reprehensible shit is ban worthy.
You weren't but another user was which is why they got banned for a day.We are not advocating anything illegal. We are not actively conspiring to allow 40 year olds to cross state lines to fuck a 16 year old. We are not rewriting legal codes for the feds or the state. It is a discussion board. If someone on their off-time decides they want to cross state lines and fuck a 16 year old and are caught, it's their problem, not ours.
You have a point. Yours truly can be just as much of a dumbass as anyone else. And I have to admit it's probably true more often than I would care to admit. My apologies here as well.Well how about next time when you're in the discord with us and I explain a 24-hour ban AT LENGTH, you say something before the 24 hours is over?
You had the power of the entire time to unban Ishtar. It seems to me like you let me go ahead with the ban, and because it wasn't popular you're going to pretend like you're mad at me over it now that the ban is over.
You knew I banned Ishtar. You did nothing. You said nothing. You let the ban wrap up. And now you're pretending like you're upset that she got banned.
This was not something that went over your head and under your nose. I gave you the Iggy about this the second I did it. I told you here and I told you in one of our DMs. Don't tell me you didn't check either of those alerts.
View attachment 98594
View attachment 98596
You knew on discord and you knew on here. Look at where I told you on staff chats right after I banned her. Literally the next response is you.
@Ishtar I was reactionary and I apologize and I will loosen up on the moderation style, and next time I'll make it more clear if I'm trying to get you to steer away from a subject or if I'm trying to just win an argument. Because it wasn't about me proving myself right I was trying to get you to stop and you wouldn't stop. There's a lot of scrutiny right now and there's a lot of scrutiny on the horizon, so we need to stay away from topics like that unless it's an obvious joke.
And to everybody I'm sorry about being such a tight ass. My apologies about the Ishtar ban, I was wrong on that one and I'm an adult enough to admit that I fucked up.
First off:
"Federal law mandates that individuals must be at least 18 to consent to sexual activity if the activity involves interstate travel or online communication with a minor. This means that even if a state's age of consent is lower than 18, the federal standard will apply in specific cases."
Federal law overrides state law. I don't give a shit what places are late to the party of making the age of consent 18, because what is legal isn't always moral and what is moral isn't always legal. If an adult crosses state or country lines to meet a 16 year old for sex that is still a sex crime and it is sex trafficking to take a minor to a place where it is legal to fuck them for a reason. And let's not act like that is meant to allow 40 year olds to fuck 16 year olds because it's clearly meant to be for the Romeo and Juliet laws. This is not the hill to die on and it's off topic. Advocating for doing both illegal and morally reprehensible shit is ban worthy.
I don't know about that. Bank robbery is pretty serious business.Smokey and the bandit voice: GOT A BROAD IN THE CAR, TOOK HER ACROSS THE STATE LINE, AND THAT'S THE MANN ACT!
BANK ROBBIN IS BABY SHIT ALONGSIDE WHAT THIS DUDE'S DOIN!!!
Using the same logic that they are using to defend middle aged men fucking 16 year olds you could easily make the argument the age of consent is 11 in Nigeria so letting Africans post jailbait photos isn't a crime.Smokey and the bandit voice: GOT A BROAD IN THE CAR, TOOK HER ACROSS THE STATE LINE, AND THAT'S THE MANN ACT!
BANK ROBBIN IS BABY SHIT ALONGSIDE WHAT THIS DUDE'S DOIN!!!
I don't know about that. Bank robbery is pretty serious business.
A penalty for a Mann Act violation, also known as the "White Slavery Act," can result in a maximum of 10 years in federal prison and a fine for transporting adults across state lines for illegal sexual activity. Penalties are significantly harsher when the offense involves a minor (under 18), potentially including mandatory minimum sentences. In addition to imprisonment and fines, a conviction can lead to other consequences like asset forfeiture and mandatory sex offender registration.
The typical penalty for a federal bank robbery ranges from several years in prison to life imprisonment or even the death penalty, depending on the circumstances. Because most banks and credit unions are federally insured, robbery of these institutions is usually prosecuted as a federal crime under 18 U.S.C. § 2113. The severity of the punishment depends on the level of force used and the harm caused.
The age of consent in Nigeria is 18 years old, but the law is inconsistently applied across the country. The discrepancy is largely due to the existence of different legal frameworks governing different regions.Using the same logic that they are using to defend middle aged men fucking 16 year olds you could easily make the argument the age of consent is 11 in Nigeria so letting Africans post jailbait photos isn't a crime.
Using the same logic that they are using to defend middle aged men fucking 16 year olds you could easily make the argument the age of consent is 11 in Nigeria so letting Africans post jailbait photos isn't a crime.
The age of consent in Nigeria is 18 years old, but the law is inconsistently applied across the country. The discrepancy is largely due to the existence of different legal frameworks governing different regions.
Legal frameworks in Nigeria
Complicating factors
- Child Rights Act (CRA): This federal law, which has been adopted by many but not all Nigerian states, sets the age of consent at 18. Under the CRA, any sexual intercourse with a person under 18 is considered rape.
- Criminal Code Act: This law applies to the states in Southern Nigeria. It also stipulates the age of consent as 18.
- Penal Code Act: This law governs the Northern states and is influenced by Sharia law. Under the Penal Code, the age of consent for girls depends on their marital status, not their age. This means a girl who is married is considered to be of full age, regardless of her actual age.
- Adoption of the CRA: Not all states have fully adopted and domesticated the Child Rights Act. In some states, especially in the North, older interpretations of the law or local customs regarding child marriage may still be practiced.
- Child marriage: The practice of child marriage continues, particularly in Northern Nigeria. This is sometimes justified by the Penal Code and a controversial constitutional provision stating that "any woman who is married shall be deemed to be of full age".
- Efforts to raise the age: Organizations like the Malala Fund have run campaigns, such as the #raisetheage petition, to advocate for a single, consistent age of consent of 18 across Nigeria.
I accept your apology.
I don't appreciate having my words misrepresented as "defending sleeping with underage girls". I made two posts on the topic, one of which was posting the actual state laws. Kiwifarmers slandering people they don't like as pedos is very relevant to to the thread and will be something people here want to discuss.
There is no reason to censor discussion on this.
Nigeria is one of those states that has a big religious fault line running through it. The southern half of the country is predominately Christian while the Northern part is predominately Muslim.Trying to bump the law up to 18?
Nigeria wins AGAIN.