I would somewhat agree with @fag0t . @The Gays From LA what you post is subject to legitimate criticism. A block feature could be used to simply shut out legitimate criticism.
-
Welcome, Notices, Content in the Spotlight
The best Kiwifarms splinter site on the internet. All Walks of life, regardless of race, religion, political orientation, sexual orientation, gender identity. if you rock with the Onions, you are one of us.
Our Onionfarms merchandise store is now open: https://onionmart.printify.me
๐Under the Magnifying Glass - KennethErwinEngelhardt.net
April 27, 2024: Nigerian journalist Adanna interviews Brother Alameen on KennethErwinEngelhardt.net over pedophile allegations
Announcement Update: No I Am Not Resigning
- Thread starter Kenneth Erwin Engelhardt
- Start date
Crying to Ken in DMs about stickers? I would bet a few quid that begging to be made janny also occurred. @Kenneth Erwin Engelhardt please leave the ignore as it is.
I am considering a middle ground on this. @The Gays From LA was not interested in being a janny.
If you want to block someone that should be a free choice. But at the same time I won't impose any restrictions on screencapping whatever is posted. So for example @The Gays From LA would have the right to block @fag0t but it would also be the right of someone to screencap @The Gays From LA posts and let @fag0t or whoever comment on them. Honestly this could have a major impact on the free flow of discussion on the forum. I want to get more input from users on this.
Seriously, what is wrong with the current system? Change it and you'll encourage autistic tards to make socks for block evading and sniping.
I didn't think of that. And you're right, it could open up another can of worms.
Ignore feature works fine as it is, the only thing that would improve it is the ability to toggle if ignored users can post messages on people's wall. That way users can ignore people like me or gays from la. While still letting others post without needing to follow each other. I'm not the only one posting terrible shit like skinned dicks and a tranny performing auto fellatio fisting his shit covered ass on people's wall. Gays posted dead ducks and dead middle eastern kids. And again, it should be a toggle option in settings so people can opt in or out not a change.
>gays from la was not interested in being a janny
you know nobody believes this at all hes been demanding you ban people and add changes to the site that affect other users ability to see and interact with posts and he has done this publically so we can only imagine the kind of crying he does in private you should not be listening to him if he is upset over people thinking his posts or retarded or rating them in ways he does not like he needs to just accept thats how things are on this forum or he should leave things are fine how they are now and some cry baby faggot shouldnt be able to change that
@fag0t I am not changing anything.
@Kenneth Erwin Engelhardt can you post a picture of your stomach pls
Reason: Don't take this seriously I'm quoting a quote that appears at the top of the page randomly.
Toucapac
Registered
legitimate question...
are you trying to compete with nairaland?
Why truth social...who tf even uses truth social...
Toucapac
Registered
boomers and conspiritards.
Fuck it, I'm just gonna make a truth social account to take the piss.
I made some accounts to troll people in the Donald conspiracy and q Anon groups over on communities.win.
They talk about flat earth vaccine nanobots and follow the plan where a fat orange man with a spray tan loses "on purpose" (totally not a cope guys) as some 12 d chess move. They are easy targets. All of them are just as big a snowflake as any leftist they make Tl Dr scizo rants about.
Reason: Q anon group is called great awakening.