Chrysler Building
Hellovan Onion
So now Null is imagining having sex with men?
I actually agree with him. I too think 99,99% of porn nowadays is violent, degrading, dehumanizing and nothing a sane individual who values their sex life and that of their significant other should want to watch. What Didl conveniently forgets to mention is that most of these hyperviolent BDSM porn movies are still straight porn movies. It's a woman getting wrecked and ruined by a man. That's what straight people do to one another when they are being heterosexual exhibitionists on the internet. Yet Didl and Null still insist that hetero sex is somehow less destructive and dangerous than gay sex. Or they will blame straight people having acess to gay porn for "inspiring" straight people to have more degenerate sex, as if straight people can't be degenerate on their own and somehow feel the need to catch up with the gays' more advanced levels of degeneracy.
I actually agree with him. I too think 99,99% of porn nowadays is violent, degrading, dehumanizing and nothing a sane individual who values their sex life and that of their significant other should want to watch. What Didl conveniently forgets to mention is that most of these hyperviolent BDSM porn movies are still straight porn movies. It's a woman getting wrecked and ruined by a man. That's what straight people do to one another when they are being heterosexual exhibitionists on the internet. Yet Didl and Null still insist that hetero sex is somehow less destructive and dangerous than gay sex. Or they will blame straight people having acess to gay porn for "inspiring" straight people to have more degenerate sex, as if straight people can't be degenerate on their own and somehow feel the need to catch up with the gays' more advanced levels of degeneracy.
If you need to remind yourself what cuddly, loving, tender sex heterosexuals are having as opposed to those disgusting gay homosexuals wrecking their assholes, just go watch the next straight porn movie you're spammed with. It's amazing to me how trad-LARPers like Null and Didl will bigot-wax poetically about all the sick depraved asshole-ruining gay porn, when most violent porn online is straight porn. How willfully blind do you have to be not to see this?
Yes because they are all totally posted by women...I guess you don't read up the threads on the womens sites where the girls detail their secret fantasies or fetishes.
There are no Women on the internet at all!Yes because they are all totally posted by women...
There are, but there are more men pretendingThere are no Women on the internet at all!
There are, but there are more men pretending
I guess you don't read up the threads on the womens sites where the girls detail their secret fantasies or fetishes.
I didn't say anything was negative, I said lots of men pretend to be women. This is objectively true.As soon as a woman posts something that reflects negatively on women, the first reaction is it must be a man attempting to make women look bad. Theres no such thing as bad women? Okay.
So what percentage of the sites is Men telling Women their trans fantasies? vs Real Women do you think?I didn't say anything was negative, I said lots of men pretend to be women. This is objectively true.
I'm not going to quantify it, but if you think it's not a phenomenon you are too naive for this worldSo what percentage of the sites is Men telling Women their trans fantasies? vs Real Women do you think?
I guess you don't read up the threads on the womens sites where the girls detail their secret fantasies or fetishes.
Obviously he knows. He has a point though, it's silly to always handwave what has been said by women on the internet as written by a man. It should be something you consider, but unless there's evidence for it being true there's nothing wrong with assuming that a woman did indeed write it.I'm not going to quantify it, but if you think it's not a phenomenon you are too naive for this world
Obviously he knows. He has a point though, it's silly to always handwave what has been said by women on the internet as written by a man. It should be something you consider, but unless there's evidence for it being true there's nothing wrong with assuming that a woman did indeed write it.
I never said Men had the moral high ground.Men don't have any moral high ground to stand on when it comes to porn. (This is because of the innate homosexuality present in all men but that's another post. See: Fight Club.)
You can usually tell when a Man writes it because it will go into more detail than neccessary. Women don't like to talk about exactly what they did blow by blow like they are directing a sex scene.Obviously he knows. He has a point though, it's silly to always handwave what has been said by women on the internet as written by a man. It should be something you consider, but unless there's evidence for it being true there's nothing wrong with assuming that a woman did indeed write it.
I never said Men had the moral high ground.
Not necessarily. I'd say the delineation is the focus. When women write about sex, they focus on the emotional aspect, the feelings that actions evoke for them. Men write about the carnal aspect, the actions themselves, more what's happening than how it makes them feel (not elaborating past "good" or other such simple descriptors of feelings).You can usually tell when a Man writes it because it will go into more detail than neccessary. Women don't like to talk about exactly what they did blow by blow like they are directing a sex scene.
because whenever a guy says girls can be scrotes the first thing girls say is; no, guys are bigger scrotes. I think it's probably around the same. But Women don't go blasting it around the internet because they sensitive to the reputation hit.Then why seethe?
because whenever a guy says girls can be scrotes the first thing girls say is; no, guys are bigger scrotes. I think it's probably around the same. But Women don't go blasting it around the internet because they sensitive to the reputation hit.