Is it even worth it at that point? Plus the problem is outright lies being pushed by even mainstream media.. ("3 deaths" etc) It doesn't matter if it's all based on one media org parroting another, who was repeating yet another, who was repeating some activist on twatter who themselves offered no evidence. Attempts to point out little things like the victims themselves, in their an hero notes, not mentioning kiwi or even "abuse", is already outright ignored and blocked. (hell, you can't even talk about them because doing so hurts the various narratives built around them being used to push narratives.) So why would anyone expect anything different if they kind of gave in? Giving in is not going to stop the terrorist kiwis driving people to death narrative or shut the activists up.
To break this down:
(1) Null and the regulars have proven to not believe or respect the TRA narrative. That is already enough to warrant and demand complete public banishment and silencing under modern progressive ideology. (2) These are people who believe in not just guilt by association but guilt by failure to virtue signal with the correct opinions. It wouldn't matter if Null turned the clear-net site into a troon safe space, complete with heavy handed censorship and silencing. The fact that he or the site was in any way connected to kiwi or opinions they don't like, would make him and the site worse then hitler and the nazi party combined for these people. (at least officially/publicly) In fact even without kiwi, it's not clear if a full turn and apology would be enough to save those involved in so subverting troon messaging, to this point... at least not on the level or scale as the farms has done. (3) Kiwi is a great evil for these people. The hysterics filled narratives are already spun up and fully in place. Mere continued existence is all it will take to support a continued holy war and crusade. Especially because they rarely have ever ran into a case where they get told no. The persistence and dissent of the farms, so openly and publicly, means Null nor the site can ever be left alone at this point. For ego and the show. (remember, mere mild questioning is "literal" life and death.. genocide, in these people's narrative. Kiwi has publicly pushed it to outright dissent.. and not politely either.)
Not to mention that's giving them a DANGEROUS victory. I mean there is no fallback or alt at this point. If they win here, the open net is officially dead. Importantly, not on a legal level. Free speech online literally means nothing even in the US with this.