Kiwifarms Gossip Kiwifarms Down a Lot

[Nektar Geist]

President of São Tomé and Príncipe | Current Leader

Carlos Vila Nova, President of Sao Tome and Principe (since Oct 2, 2021) Carlos Manuel Vila Nova is a São Toméan politician who is the fifth and current president of São Tomé and Príncipe, since 2 October 2021. He served as the minister of Public Works and Natural Resources (2010–2012) and...

planetrulers.com

This is the head honcho of Sao Tome and Pringles

Mr #dropkiwifarms an all will now have to complain to this man. A dictator. Of a wog country no less. Considering the things that go on in 3rd World Countries, how will man feel about people complaining to him (or his flunkies, tbf) about "misgendering" and shit like that.
Tome
Just remember broom. Whitey betrayed you, and if it wasn't for this... well not ebony Hercules, mocha? Cafe au lait? anyway, you get my point. First a tranny saved your wobble botty, now it's this jig.

nfn I know they have Nigerian "princes", how about Sao Tome? It's just you know how kwiffar are...

 

[Empresa]

This is the head honcho of Sao Tome and Pringles

yeah this man can be bought with a few crypto shekles

 

[Nektar Geist]

https://worldscientific.com/doi/10.1142/S2591729320500066

https://archive.is/wip/iS5By

"The Democratic Republic of São Tomé and Príncipe, a small and remote island state, located in the Gulf of Guinea, has long offered little geopolitical and geo-economic interest. This situation is however gradually changing. In fact, since 2016, interest in the country has begun to grow, after the country resumed diplomatic relations with People’s Republic of China (hereafter China) and recognized the “one-China policy”.

Well joshy likes the chinks. ofc not the great and cool ones who did great and cool things. He likes commies.

"The microstate of São Tomé and Príncipe has the potential to transform itself to function as the “Qatar of the Gulf of Guinea”, and contribute to regional stability by providing regional services for shipping, banking, finance, high-quality education, tourism and as an engaged partner".

Everybody has seen the videos of Chink manager getting shit from African workers, right? Man, the jigs HATE the yellow man.

 

[Kenneth Erwin Engelhardt]

https://worldscientific.com/doi/10.1142/S2591729320500066

https://archive.is/wip/iS5By

"The Democratic Republic of São Tomé and Príncipe, a small and remote island state, located in the Gulf of Guinea, has long offered little geopolitical and geo-economic interest. This situation is however gradually changing. In fact, since 2016, interest in the country has begun to grow, after the country resumed diplomatic relations with People’s Republic of China (hereafter China) and recognized the “one-China policy”.

Well joshy likes the chinks. ofc not the great and cool ones who did great and cool things. He likes commies.

"The microstate of São Tomé and Príncipe has the potential to transform itself to function as the “Qatar of the Gulf of Guinea”, and contribute to regional stability by providing regional services for shipping, banking, finance, high-quality education, tourism and as an engaged partner".

Everybody has seen the videos of Chink manager getting shit from African workers, right? Man, the jigs HATE the yellow man.

LGBT Rights in Sao Tome and Principe | Equaldex

LGBT Rights in Sao Tome and Principe: homosexuality, gay marriage, gay adoption, serving in the military, sexual orientation discrimination protection, changing legal gender, donating blood, age of consent, and more.

www.equaldex.com

They are kind of a mixed bag when it comes to gay rights though relatively speaking they are more tolerant than many African countries. And yeah many people don't realize just how racist the Chinese can be against black Africans.

 

[Jetstream Sharpe]

Kwiifarr.pl is down again

 

[Nektar Geist]

how racist the Chinese can be against black Africans.

Decades of the "Knock Out" game might have something to do with that. You know what I mean?

 

[VAIDS Victim]

Just a moment...

 

[Freya]

Oh nononono. joshbros, sig is making fun of our leader again.

 

[Empresa]

It'll be gone soon. It's pretty easy to see what part of their website sold him,

 

[notgivingmynametoamachine]

The domain kiwifarms.pl was just seized by KeySystems their webhosting company in Germany. Now if you don't know what the .pl domain is, it is the country domain for Poland. And yep, I knew this would happen.

Wait, for what reason?

 

[Kenneth Erwin Engelhardt]

Wait, for what reason?

Josh did not say but I would have a hunch it was for violating hate speech laws in Poland.

 

[The Gays From LA]

Josh did not say but I would have a hunch it was for violating hate speech laws in Poland.

Which is still nonsense because Poland allows countless of American websites that contain speech that is fully legal in the US itself but still violates some vague EU speech law or another, they'll still allow all those American websites to access Poland. It's opportunistic and arbitrary. No one should be celebrating this.

The US constitutionally guarantees Americans' right to express hateful speech. EU countries individually, arbitrarily and selectively ban speech which is legal in the US itself, but they interpret as being somehow unlawful in the EU. This behaviour on the part of EU ISPs is arbitrary, opportunistic and directly violates the principle of equality under law. Either you're going to ban each and every American website for inherently potentially violating EU speech laws, or you're going to accept that Americans have a different speech regime to the EU and that interacting with the American internet means tolerating Americans' full free speech rights, including their right to post hate-speech.

I do not want EU companies opportunistically deciding which constitutionally guaranteed American speech they're going to tolerate passing through their networks or not. If you don't like the American internet, where hate-speech is protected and allowed, don't go on the American internet. Period. Americans, for the most part, don't need to access EU websites. Europeans have agreed to use overwhelmingly American social media and are the ones who need to access the American internet en masse. It's simple supply and demand. I said this back then the EU started threatening Elon Musk: if the EU doesn't like Twitter, they can make their own Twitter.

 

[Kenneth Erwin Engelhardt]

Which is still nonsense because Poland allows countless of American websites that contain speech that is fully legal in the US itself but still violates some vague EU speech law or another, they'll still allow all those American websites to access Poland. It's opportunistic and arbitrary. No one should be celebrating this.

The US constitutionally guarantees Americans' right to express hateful speech. EU countries individually, arbitrarily and selectively ban speech which is legal in the US itself, but they interpret as being somehow unlawful in the EU. This behaviour on the part of EU ISPs is arbitrary, opportunistic and directly violates the principle of equality under law. Either you're going to ban each and every American website for inherently potentially violating EU speech laws, or you're going to accept that Americans have a different speech regime to the EU and that interacting with the American internet means tolerating Americans' full free speech rights, including their right to post hate-speech.

I do not want EU companies opportunistically deciding which constitutionally guaranteed American speech they're going to tolerate passing through their networks or not. If you don't like the American internet, where hate-speech is protected and allowed, don't go on the American internet. Period. Americans, for the most part, don't need to access EU websites. Europeans have agreed to use overwhelmingly American social media and are the ones who need to access the American internet en masse. It's simple supply and demand. I said this back then the EU started threatening Elon Musk: if the EU doesn't like Twitter, they can make their own Twitter.

With one big difference: Germany, Poland and many others suffered under the Hitler and the 3rd Reich. We didn't . Yes we have a shameful legacy of slavery, Jim Crow and the internment of Japanese American Citizens was something I hope never ever happens to any ethnic group again. But we were not systematically shoving minorities into gas chambers in mass numbers like Hitler did.

 

[Assley Butsmell]

Which is still nonsense because Poland allows countless of American websites that contain speech that is fully legal in the US itself but still violates some vague EU speech law or another, they'll still allow all those American websites to access Poland. It's opportunistic and arbitrary. No one should be celebrating this.

The US constitutionally guarantees Americans' right to express hateful speech. EU countries individually, arbitrarily and selectively ban speech which is legal in the US itself, but they interpret as being somehow unlawful in the EU. This behaviour on the part of EU ISPs is arbitrary, opportunistic and directly violates the principle of equality under law. Either you're going to ban each and every American website for inherently potentially violating EU speech laws, or you're going to accept that Americans have a different speech regime to the EU and that interacting with the American internet means tolerating Americans' full free speech rights, including their right to post hate-speech.

I do not want EU companies opportunistically deciding which constitutionally guaranteed American speech they're going to tolerate passing through their networks or not. If you don't like the American internet, where hate-speech is protected and allowed, don't go on the American internet. Period. Americans, for the most part, don't need to access EU websites. Europeans have agreed to use overwhelmingly American social media and are the ones who need to access the American internet en masse. It's simple supply and demand. I said this back then the EU started threatening Elon Musk: if the EU doesn't like Twitter, they can make their own Twitter.

You seem like a decent person overall but can you stop spedposting?

 

[Crimson Fucker]

Lulz

 

[Nektar Geist]

can you stop spedposting?

X

 

[Nektar Geist]

"'Ello dere miztah Pohtah, it's seems we be 'avin' sum problumz wid ur siiiaate, cahn we ave ur beeta-coyun, fattie bum bum"

 

[Kenneth Erwin Engelhardt]

You seem like a decent person overall but can you stop spedposting?

I not sure what you mean by spedposting. I don't see anything out of the ordinary.

 

[analrape2000]

With one big difference: Germany, Poland and many others suffered under the Hitler and the 3rd Reich. We didn't . Yes we have a shameful legacy of slavery, Jim Crow and the internment of Japanese American Citizens was something I hope never ever happens to any ethnic group again. But we were not systematically shoving minorities into gas chambers in mass numbers like Hitler did.

>he believes it

 

[Chrysler Building]

Which is still nonsense because Poland allows countless of American websites that contain speech that is fully legal in the US itself but still violates some vague EU speech law or another, they'll still allow all those American websites to access Poland. It's opportunistic and arbitrary. No one should be celebrating this.

The US constitutionally guarantees Americans' right to express hateful speech. EU countries individually, arbitrarily and selectively ban speech which is legal in the US itself, but they interpret as being somehow unlawful in the EU. This behaviour on the part of EU ISPs is arbitrary, opportunistic and directly violates the principle of equality under law. Either you're going to ban each and every American website for inherently potentially violating EU speech laws, or you're going to accept that Americans have a different speech regime to the EU and that interacting with the American internet means tolerating Americans' full free speech rights, including their right to post hate-speech.

I do not want EU companies opportunistically deciding which constitutionally guaranteed American speech they're going to tolerate passing through their networks or not. If you don't like the American internet, where hate-speech is protected and allowed, don't go on the American internet. Period. Americans, for the most part, don't need to access EU websites. Europeans have agreed to use overwhelmingly American social media and are the ones who need to access the American internet en masse. It's simple supply and demand. I said this back then the EU started threatening Elon Musk: if the EU doesn't like Twitter, they can make their own Twitter.

It just underlines how dependent Europe is on America and how shamefur and dishonorabu their desperate stabs at independence are.

I would bet that KF is a high profile target and thus easy for them to take down so they can pretend to be doing something about "Naziism" while leaving other sites alone.