Announcement Catministrator announcements

[Mario]

Make a template for people have to have when writing a OP. It gets annoying when people come in just put a link and say "hey do you know ____?".

 

[Subhuman Bastard]

Honestly, there shouldn't be many rules on writing the OP aside from that the material should be funny and the post shouldn't be angry. OPs can be expanded upon overtime as a thread grows.

 

[OneRootinTootinMotherFucker]

Shouldn't the only rule be "is this funny, entertaining, or salient?"

 

[Yandere]

Shouldn't the only rule be "is this funny, entertaining, or salient?"

What about if the subject in question is a minor?

 

[OneRootinTootinMotherFucker]

What about if the subject in question is a minor?

then put them in the tooter thread

 

[Syrup]

@OnionNull

You are the only person in the world who cares about bollywood celebrity’s and “public figures”

Stop forcing people to adhere to your own autistic principles, not even Null did this shit.

I don’t know how but you found a way to suck all of the fun out of lolcows.

 

[Syrup]

Sounds good. The thread subjects should be genuine public figures / borderline celebs, not some obscure furry artists on deviantart who get harassed for their inflation art.

If you’re going to moralfag about the ethics of laughing at lunatics and morons on a lolcow fourm get the fuck out.

No-one cares .

 

[Onion NullOnion Null is verified member.]

What about if the subject in question is a minor?

People under the age of 18 may have a thread on them provided they are fully verified as a celebrity (Celebrity Tier Level 6 or 7).

 

[OneRootinTootinMotherFucker]

People under the age of 18 may have a thread on them provided they are fully verified as a celebrity (Celebrity Tier Level 6 or 7).

what if they're 13 and have their papers?

 

[Subhuman Bastard]

what if they're 13 and have their papers?

Then they get featured.

 

[Onion NullOnion Null is verified member.]

@OnionNull

You are the only person in the world who cares about bollywood celebrity’s and “public figures”

Stop forcing people to adhere to your own autistic principles, not even Null did this shit.

I don’t know how but you found a way to suck all of the fun out of lolcows.

You're forgetting Null had to set up his own hosting service so KF was being continually kicked off everywhere else (hosting services, payment processors such as Paypal, and merchandise supply stores). I haven't even mentioned that he now has to worry about a default judgment against him.
https://kiwifarms.net/threads/biting-the-hand-that-feeds.80828/
"Between the years of 2016 and 2019, I spent $20,000, my entire life's savings, to support myself during a time of near-zero income. I moved to Ukraine to reduce my personal expenses. I was banned from PayPal and a dozen different payment networks. We were kicked off RedBubble and other merchandise supply stores. We changed VPS hosts at least 100 times. I eventually spent the last money I had to buy a server ($2000), an IPv4/IPv6 range (a $2000 annual subscription), and a colocation contract ($750/mo, more than my rent)."

It isn't just a matter of forcing people to stick to my own autistic principles, As the administrator I have to make decisions that are in the best interests of this forum and the people involved so I don't end up in the same pitfalls as Null.

 

[Onion NullOnion Null is verified member.]

what if they're 13 and have their papers?

I am not sure what you mean "have their papers".

 

[Onion NullOnion Null is verified member.]

If you’re going to moralfag about the ethics of laughing at lunatics and morons on a lolcow fourm get the fuck out.

No-one cares .

I care and Cybertron is spot on about the ethics of a forum like this.

 

[Onion NullOnion Null is verified member.]

Shouldn't the only rule be "is this funny, entertaining, or salient?"

No.

 

[Syrup]

I care and Cybertron is spot on about the ethics of a forum like this.

The ethics is if you post shit on the internet you run the risk of being mocked. if you you think this would upset you don’t post shit on the internet for people to mock.

Its not a human right to be able to post retarded nonsense without being made fun off.

 

[Onion NullOnion Null is verified member.]

The ethics is if you post shit on the internet you run the risk of being mocked. if you you think this would upset you don’t post shit on the internet for people to mock.

Its not a human right to be able to post retarded nonsense without being made fun off.

It's one thing to be mocked, it's quite another if you are universally banned.

 

[OneRootinTootinMotherFucker]

No.

what is the criteria for "grandfathering" in cows?

 

[OneRootinTootinMotherFucker]

You're forgetting Null had to set up his own hosting service so KF was being continually kicked off everywhere else (hosting services, payment processors such as Paypal, and merchandise supply stores). I haven't even mentioned that he now has to worry about a default judgment against him.
https://kiwifarms.net/threads/biting-the-hand-that-feeds.80828/
"Between the years of 2016 and 2019, I spent $20,000, my entire life's savings, to support myself during a time of near-zero income. I moved to Ukraine to reduce my personal expenses. I was banned from PayPal and a dozen different payment networks. We were kicked off RedBubble and other merchandise supply stores. We changed VPS hosts at least 100 times. I eventually spent the last money I had to buy a server ($2000), an IPv4/IPv6 range (a $2000 annual subscription), and a colocation contract ($750/mo, more than my rent)."

It isn't just a matter of forcing people to stick to my own autistic principles, As the administrator I have to make decisions that are in the best interests of this forum and the people involved so I don't end up in the same pitfalls as Null.

Well, considering you're a lolcow, and this is your forum, and you won't be suing yourself, I don't understand why you are fighting so hard against having a thread made on yourself. Seems like the perfect situation.

 

[Onion NullOnion Null is verified member.]

what is the criteria for "grandfathering" in cows?

In general if they are prominent in internet culture such as referenced in alternate wikis, forums, or major social media I would want to check it first but it would probably be approved.

 

[Onion NullOnion Null is verified member.]

Well, considering you're a lolcow, and this is your forum, and you won't be suing yourself, I don't understand why you are fighting so hard against having a thread made on yourself. Seems like the perfect situation.

There is already a thread made on me.