Does he just have carte blanche to use his mod privs to win arguments and harass users?
Ex-fuckin-cuse me you were arguing about normalcy of banging teenagers and had to answer legit concern from people, including him, Crimson might be witty wanker but he does his job nonetheless.
You may disagree with how he deal with things or what he says, but if he was picked for the broom there was a reason to it.
I don't think it's fair he can "get the last word" by locking the thread after replying to it.
He can, actually, because that thread served no other purpose but going in circles beating down the dead horse, it was already stated that if you're adult and you lust for teens you're having serious issues you have to adress and deal with them, if you advocate for "MAP" bs then don't be a stranger to ridicule and roast.
Again, AoC means fuck all, you may argue that by state laws it's okay to bang X years olds, people in them majority (we don't count most of arabs and jeets cuz these aren't people) have agreed upon that if you're grown ass individual, everyone below 18 is no go, even if laws say you can tip in someone who's 17-16-15-14. It doesn't matter, universal standard these days is 18.
In a span of few decades the number become 21 because the youth is getting more and more infantile, retarded, unresponsive to the calls of taking responsibility for their lives, their actions.
Do you really need one mentally unstable retard as a mod at all times?
Ye we do,'tis ima here so wha~ ya have da problems w' tis, cracka?!
Did you not learn from Jack?
Did you not learn from earlier conversations that some statements are better to be not voiced out loud and not supported at all?
I may, as well, to do the same thing to this thread like
@Gore San did with your "debate" thread. It's not my call though unless I'll be given such instructions. I'd rather watch you dig even deeper hole for yourself.
