All Liz and their friends are going to do is point to the Australia judgement. Outside of Australia, the legal situation in other places like the EU is unlikely to be better. S230 only exists in the US and even in the States it has loopholes.
Look, the Australian default judgement is very obviously baseless forum shopping libel tourism, and was very obviously obtained purely for the sake of tactical advantage, so that Liz Fong-Jones would have some Paper Tiger to wave at ISPs and Tier1s if they don't relent upon first contact with their abuse department. Liz Fong-Jones wants to be able to say:
"Look, I sued and I won!", when upon closer inspection it's just a default judgement and no substantial argument was made or had in court. This is why Null should've sued Liz Fong-Jones first instead of waiting for Liz to make the first legal move. Now Null is going to have to play defense, and he's going to have to do so as a third party to the lolsuit, not as a direct party/defendant, because Vincent is the defendant here, not Null. Null says he doesn't want to waste $75k of his alleged $300k in crypto to sue Liz Fong-Jones... but what if Null now has to waste that amount helping Vincent with his defense in Australia? Null will be wasting money anyway, whether that's to help Vincent with his appeal, or whether it is to sue Liz Fong-Jones. If Vincent manages to succesfully appeal the default judgement, he should definitely consider suing Liz Fong-Jones for abuse of process in Australia, just to give him a taste of his own medicine.
You can rest assured that Liz Fong-Jones will continue waving his default judgement at ISPs as long as it's not repealed. I am not hearing anything about Null and Vincent getting a defense lawyer in Australia to appeal the default judgement. I hope they've already gotten one, because I know Liz Fong-Jones is sadistic enough to use his default judgement to process serve Vincent and strip him of his assets (basically, empty his house, take his car, take his wages, etc) just to have someone to hold at gun-point before Null. Again, I don't know if Liz Fong-Jones can process-serve in Australia on the basis of a default judgement, but if he can, that's another weapon he can use against Null.
Liz and pals can now rock up to these Tier 1 and 2 ISPs and say, "Doing business in Australia? Doing business in the EU? Drop the farms or give me $$$ / €€€", and Liz will probably be right about that.
Liz Fong-Jones isn't going to sue ISPs and Tier1s, that would give him a bad reputation in his own professional field. LFJ wants all those ISPs and Tier1s on his team and against team KF, he doesn't want to turn them into antagonists by suing them.
This is a dumb question. But what is a TRA?
That wasn't a question but a statement. TRA = Trans Right Activist. It's usually a trans person who is SJW woke, but sometimes it's a cis person who is even more zealous about trans rights than trans people themselves are, and is parading their trans allyship for woke points.
