A proud, independent and vibrant splinter of the Kiwifarms community. All races, ethnicities, religions, gay/straight, CIS/trans, neurodiversity affirmative. If you can rock with us: You are one of us.
Please note: Positions or opinions expressed are personal and don't reflect official stances by Onionfarms.

Find member

Kiwifarms Speculation Lidl Drip Comprehensive Thread

Parody Threads related to Kiwifarms Satire and speculation threads related to Null or Kiwifarms go here.
Yes, femcels are going to use the men who support them and stay in their lane like tools, but still hate them since they hate all men with no exceptions, than the bitter men who hate them and call them foids. Because they are bitter women who call them moids.
Ftfy
 
Does anyone happen to have this alleged picture of Lidl Drip?

View attachment 90670

The original post by LemonParty has of course been deleted but they forgot to leave up this person replying to it.
I don't but this holds up the Anna slatz theory

IMG_1852.jpeg

GC0ZG7UXMAAup8S.jpg_large.jpg


She got a nose job in the first pic.
 
Lidl drip is old man Jenkins
 
Anna Slatz is capable of based thoughts from time to time, something Lidl is not capable of despite her constant diarrheic posting, not even accidentally.
Are you certain? They're both part of, what we would call the female alt-right where they hate faggots, niggers, and trannies but conveniently have endless sympathy for prostitutes, single moms, adulteresses and if they're brown they somehow think they're better then other browns. Anna Slatz has her own kiwifarms account but that's more of an official thing. The truth is I don't know for certain Slatz is drip.
 
You're saying what I said with extra steps. Most men who don't have a chip on their shoulder would rather talk to women than bitter men. As much as we laugh at Null's simping, it's a lot smarter of a play than continuing to support the increasingly unpopular incel-right.
Using them like the tools they are isn't exactly being nice it's just being manipulative, not that they don't deserve to be manipulated for being such tools. Don't mistake their weakness for kindness.
 
Anna Slatz has her own kiwifarms account but that's more of an official thing. The truth is I don't know for certain Slatz is drip.
You don't earn BBL money by poking around Kiwifarms, I believe they interact on twitter, but that's only because Null represents a small fraction of the fan base she works to cultivate.

Anna Slatz is biding her time, her goal is to be a NuConservative talking head on some News Network, maybe one day eventually yelling at Piers Morgan in an artificially boosted "viral" video, fangirling over Null would not help facilitate this.
 
I don't know what you mean by kindness, I never said anything like that.
You said they are being nicer when they are not being nicer, they are being manipulative. Kind and nice are pretty much interchangeable in this context. Playing muh autistic words games is unbecoming of you.
 
You said they are being nicer when they are not being nicer, they are being manipulative. Kind and nice are pretty much interchangeable in this context. Playing muh autistic words games is unbecoming of you.
I'm not playing word games. I think people on here are getting weird with the Beauty Parlor mocking. Null is definitely a simp but that doesn't mean it's a bad choice to back up the TERFs. I don't think people realize how hard the tide is turning towards the kind of views Null is espousing.
 
I'm not playing word games. I think people on here are getting weird with the Beauty Parlor mocking. Null is definitely a simp but that doesn't mean it's a bad choice to back up the TERFs. I don't think people realize how hard the tide is turning towards the kind of views Null is espousing.
I don't think you realize that femcels and incels are two sides of the same coin and how their views are being shit on by basically everyone who isn't retarded anyway. There is no difference between men and women doing it. This just looks like a male feminist simping cope. Just because you don't know the difference between someone being nice or being manipulative doesn't mean we can't see it.
 
Reason: Femcels are incels. Incel is just gender inclusive and non specific. Then people wanted a specific term for women and complain about gendered language.
Radfems might take over the right or at least see some kind of Hegelian synthesis. But don't forget radfems have a pretty well-beaten track record in backing cultural losers. Whereas libfems tend to successfully ride the wave of cultural change, radfems fight it and lose. Sex, pornography, political correctness, fanservice, trannies... radfems typically lose. Their only victory has been reducing pixelated boobs in video games and even that's pyrrhic. Their victory within the right-wing will just be a union between two of the biggest perennial losers in modern history.

Hence I don't really see them "winning" culturally. The loss of incel (or even manosphere/Tatefag) support will hurt more the right more than it suspects. True, incels don't contribute economically or reproductively. But a permaonline radical incel NEET is the right's best footsoldier in the digital trenches against equally online trannies. Once they become disillusioned and apathetic about politics, the internet will return to being a no-go zone for conservatives too busy working and raising families to browse 4chan/twitter 24/7. The loss of cultural presence on the internet will (predictably) spark the right to engage in a digital Benedict option like they always resort to when losing, which will just presage another leftward shift in culture since they're the only ones participating. Like how the internet was mostly left-wing prior to Gamergate.

And the radfems aren't going to take the place of the incels, because radfems have lost every battle they've picked with libfems for over half a century. You can literally see that in the very existence of the BP. Null admitted he grants it special privileges because every other place on the internet is unwelcoming to radfems. Most feminists are pro-tranny. While radfems can exist in predominantly male environments if protected by white knights, the worst enemy of a woman is other women and a woman cannot long stand against a consensus of her own sex. Null's admission is an unconscious statement that radfems are too weak and insignificant to survive beyond his protective white cloak. Like pretty much all Dworkin/Shulamith tier feminists, they die lonely meaningless deaths while the cool sexy libfems who are are totally fine with trannies exercise cultural sway in their abdication.
 
Radfems might take over the right or at least see some kind of Hegelian synthesis. But don't forget radfems have a pretty well-beaten track record in backing cultural losers. Whereas libfems tend to successfully ride the wave of cultural change, radfems fight it and lose. Sex, pornography, political correctness, fanservice, trannies... radfems typically lose.
How are they losing on any of that? People are having less sex than ever, congressmen are proposing bills to ban all pornography, you can say the n-word on Twitter now, AFAIK everyone still complains that videogames are too censored and the characters not sexy enough and the trans have lost the culture war so hard that even the UK has declared them to be men. I have to agree with pickles, Josh backing the radfems was smart of him and it was a natural alliance since the trans were the ones trying to take his site down. He even got a girlfriend out of it. I see many conservative commentators now saying the same things he has been saying about white women too after the Shiloh Hendrix thing.

the cool sexy libfems
5f08c5e1f6ed348bb023ca27b68b832a.jpg

What kinda drugs are you on?
 
Back
Top Bottom