The e-celebrity gossip and blogging forum. All who wish to be a part of our community are welcome.

🎥Breaking Content🧅

News Content:
News Content:
News Content:
News Content

Integrations

You May Now Register With:   (profile or page)

KF Gossip 🗣️🦻🏼 KF General 2.0 / Green reddit / catboy ranch 2 Neko shota boogalo / cwcki forums autistic evolution

These threads cover general gossip and interacting with Kiwifarms (openly calling them out).
Subtitle
General Discussion: users, bad takes, jannys, Null, etc
>gift from the USSR
The Mormon is right about how gay themes do not belong in children's shows, but it has nothing to do with the USSR because homosexuality was defacto illegal since it was deemed a fascist and bourgeois perversion. The commies who promoted gay rights were all western commies who in many cases opposed the USSR.
Being fair here, the USSR would be the first country in human history to decriminalize homosexuality under Vladimir Lenin after the Bolshevik Revolution.

But this didn't last long because after Lenin died, when Stalin took over he reversed this and he made homosexuality illegal in the USSR again.

Stalin believed that for Communism to become a strong force in the world then it also needed a strong family unit model. Stalin would heavily promote social conservatism where the Soviet government would heavily promote the traditional nuclear family to encourage Soviet citizens to make more communist children.

Whatever benefits homosexuals had during the rule of Lenin was stripped away by Stalin where Stalin gave Soviet gays and lesbians an ultimatum, either they get married to someone of the opposite gender and produce children for the Soviet state or they will be thrown into the gulags where they will be made useful through forced labor (being gay did not grated you a shield from Stalin's wrath).

Even after Stalin died, other communist countries would follow suit. The Cuban communist revolutionary Che Guevara was very homophobic where he believed gays have no place in a communist society (after Fidel Castro gained power in Cuba, he let Che Guevara round up many gay men in Cuba where he blew their brains out and buried them in unmarked graves). Being gay isn't illegal in China but the Chinese communist government still discriminate the LGBT community in a lot of other cruel ways.

There are exceptions to this but most communist countries historically were very anti-LGBT. You don't need far-right politics to discriminate against the LGBT community anyway.
 
Ethan Ralph posted revenge porn of his wife which put him on the sex offender registry (and he fled to Mexico afterwards to escape his legal troubles), Nick Fuentes had pedophiles like Ali Alexander in his inner circle in the past and he consumes both troon and gay porn, and Joshua Conner Moon consumed shotacon hentai and other degenerate shit back in his Blockland years.

The Far-Right has a lot of hypocritical gooners and degenerates that are projecting.

The main difference between the Far--Left and the Far-Right is that at least the Far-Left is mostly honest about their degeneracy while the Far-Right are laughable moralfags that are clearly projecting over whatever kinks they're into anyway.

I actually don't disagree with Welper here because shit like LGBT themes don't belong in kids shows. I've always objected to LGBT themes being present in media clearly made for children because I feel that is very inappropriate to have in children's media.

Even with that said, Welper's opinions about homosexuality should not to be taken seriously because he got exposed being into troon porn not that long. Much like how Nick Fuentes' opinions about why he thinks being gay is wrong is not to be taken seriously because it's been documented Nick Fuentes secretly loves troon cock and he watches gay porn which makes Fed Fuentes' opinions about homosexuality as being worthless in the debate.

Also, the USSR and many communist countries were infamously homophobic and promoted social conservatism. There were some communist countries that did granted gay rights but they were an exception. Most communist countries (former and present) had anti-gay policies where they adopted a strictly utilitarian view on family; if you refused to start a family and have children then they would send you into forced labor because you were going to be made useful to the state one way or another (Stalin infamously put gays and lesbians that refused to become heterosexual into forced labor because if homosexuals in the USSR weren't going to start a family then they were going to be useful in the gulags through soul crushing forced labor instead).

Even if said communist country doesn't adopt full blown Stalinism, most likely homosexuals would still face discrimination anyway. China is infamous for this where while being gay in of itself isn't a crime in China, homosexuals in China still face a lot of discrimination over the CCP's polices that heavily promote social conservatism.

Gay Space Communism is just modern day Internet meme and a cringy LARP. If actual communists from the Before Time were to encounter modern day Internet communists then those old school communists would advocate to throw said Internet communists into the gulags for being degenerates that make communism look bad for the rest of the world.
Really what stumped me was Welper being all “anti-pedo” but having a prophet that was a pedo. Like, how do you defend that?
 
Really what stumped me was Welper being all “anti-pedo” but having a prophet that was a pedo. Like, how do you defend that?
Yeah, it's like how Muslims call the West degenerate but they huff up the copium whenever the topic of Muhammad and Aisha comes up and they do a lot of mental gymnastics. They either downplay the fact that Muhammad had sex with a 9 year old girl in the Islamic canon or some Muslims even pretend that part of the Quran never happened and do a lot of mental gymnastics to show why they think Muhammad didn't had sex with a prepubescent girl.

As for Joseph Smith, had Joseph Smith was born much later and started Mormonism in either the 20th or 21st centuries instead where by that point many Western countries started to enact age of consent laws, then Joseph Smith would've been seen as the Christian version of Jeffery Epstein and he would've had the book thrown at him where he would've spent life in prison over him touching underage girls. The Mormon church has since stopped talking about much of Joseph Smith's polygamy in their chruch services because they know what Joseph Smith did to the minors he married (like Helen Kimball who as forced to marry Joseph Smith at the age of 14) makes their religion look really bad.

Most Christians label Mormonism as 'White Islam' for a reason. If the supernatural is real, a part of me thinks Joseph Smith was probably the reincarnation of Muhammad and when Joseph Smith died he reincarnated into L. Ron Hubbard to start Scientology.
 
Last edited:
Really what stumped me was Welper being all “anti-pedo” but having a prophet that was a pedo. Like, how do you defend that?
Mormons and Muslims (and overall religious people in general) in the west are usually very hypocritical and lukewarm about their religions, rarely do you encounter a mormon / muslim who will actually own the fact their prophet is a pedo and defend it.
 
Last edited:
Being fair here, the USSR would be the first country in human history to decriminalize homosexuality under Vladimir Lenin after the Bolshevik Revolution.
No, France after the French Revolution was the first to legalize gay sex. Homosexuality was thought of as a religious crime, so all the anti-religious countries legalized it.
 
View attachment 104987
Thoughts? I feel like both arguments sound simultaneously understandable and stupid
I highly doubt the show puts any sexual themes in it. More likely, the show is trying to expand its audience and reach more people. If someone has a problem with two moms being shown, then they should just say they have different values or that it makes them uncomfortable.
Personally, I don’t care who the kid’s parents are as long as the kid is 1) loved, 2) cared for, and 3) protected, etc.
The whole “pedo” argument is really dumb for obvious reasons. Society used to be structured around the man being the head of the household, and now look at how many shows either focus on women or portray both parents as equal heads of the family. This might sound like something a teacher would say, but society isn’t going to stay the same forever. As humanity expands and technology evolves, social structures will be replaced with others that are stronger or better adapted. Your lifestyle may be different from your parents’, and it won’t stay the same forever either it will adapt to change. What was once a minority can become a majority.
Take the USSR as an example: from 1917 to 1927, homosexuality was decriminalized. Then Stalin came in and reversed everything. Khrushchev later sat somewhere in the middlesex-related books existed, but homosexuality was practically unmentionable. From then until the fall of the USSR, being gay was criminalized.
What should be talked about more is gay rights in Europe. France decriminalized homosexuality in 1791, Poland in 1932, Turkey in 1858, Denmark in 1933, Iceland in 1940 (after gaining independence from Denmark), Switzerland in 1942, and Sweden in 1944.
Yeah, that’s about it. I’m not going to bother typing more.
 
I highly doubt the show puts any sexual themes in it. More likely, the show is trying to expand its audience and reach more people. If someone has a problem with two moms being shown, then they should just say they have different values or that it makes them uncomfortable.
Personally, I don’t care who the kid’s parents are as long as the kid is 1) loved, 2) cared for, and 3) protected, etc.
The whole “pedo” argument is really dumb for obvious reasons. Society used to be structured around the man being the head of the household, and now look at how many shows either focus on women or portray both parents as equal heads of the family. This might sound like something a teacher would say, but society isn’t going to stay the same forever. As humanity expands and technology evolves, social structures will be replaced with others that are stronger or better adapted. Your lifestyle may be different from your parents’, and it won’t stay the same forever either it will adapt to change. What was once a minority can become a majority.
Take the USSR as an example: from 1917 to 1927, homosexuality was decriminalized. Then Stalin came in and reversed everything. Khrushchev later sat somewhere in the middlesex-related books existed, but homosexuality was practically unmentionable. From then until the fall of the USSR, being gay was criminalized.
What should be talked about more is gay rights in Europe. France decriminalized homosexuality in 1791, Poland in 1932, Turkey in 1858, Denmark in 1933, Iceland in 1940 (after gaining independence from Denmark), Switzerland in 1942, and Sweden in 1944.
Yeah, that’s about it. I’m not going to bother typing more.
Recent example Greece legalizing gay marriage. So that is the current example
 
1766330575684.png



I participated in kiwifarms little secret santa event
 
the problem with the USSR is that its authoritarian nature means that talking about it shouldn't be like how we talk about western democracies but how we talk about countries under kings. No one brings up examples from Charles I rule when talking about england under William and Mary because its obvious they're totally different. Same thing under the USSR, Stalin, Lenin, Khrushchev, and Brezhnev put russia under entirely different worldviews and their liberal or conservative values reflected on the nation as a whole. Its similar to China where the leader influences everything else.

Also for all the talk about how evil homosexuality is, it really hinders the economy because of the lack of opportunities for homosexuals when its cracked down. Trump's best cabinet member is a fag, his biggest donor in '24 was a homo too. the ceo of apple was convinced to join apple because it was located in San Fran, which was a lot better towards gay people than Houston Texas in the 90s.

If you notice most bigots have stopped complaining about gays overall in favor of going after trans people too. Its like being anti-race mixing in the modern day, its hard to get people on your side.

trans acceptance will be a near impossible goal because of the whole puberty blocker issue, but gays will be here to stay. Someone on X made a good argument that poly will soon be the next goal because of the economics of it and how it will help with issues of child care and finances. which makes sense,
 
Thoughts? I feel like both arguments sound simultaneously understandable and stupid
I highly doubt the show puts any sexual themes in it. More likely, the show is trying to expand its audience and reach more people.
They think anything LGBT related is inherently hyper degenerate and sexual, so they also think anything about it in a kids show would be pedophilic.
 
Also for all the talk about how evil homosexuality is, it really hinders the economy because of the lack of opportunities for homosexuals when its cracked down. Trump's best cabinet member is a fag, his biggest donor in '24 was a homo too. the ceo of apple was convinced to join apple because it was located in San Fran, which was a lot better towards gay people than Houston Texas in the 90s.
On the farms, I usually don’t talk about politics because it really gets to me. But like
  • Tim Cook is gay.
  • Sam Altman is gay.
  • Peter Thiel is gay.
  • Scott Bessent is gay.
And the list goes on. How the fuck did we even get here?
like is elon musk going to whip his fucking dick out and let JD suck it while the fags fuck on the couch and jd is jerking it because his jeet wife can reach his g-spot like this term has been really all over the place
 
Back
Top Bottom