• I am aware we cannot upload attachments. I am in the process of getting this resolved

KF Gossip 🗣️🦻🏼 KF General 2.0 / Green reddit / catboy ranch 2 Neko shota boogalo / cwcki forums autistic evolution

These threads cover general gossip and interacting with Kiwifarms (openly calling them out).
Subtitle
General Discussion: users, bad takes, jannys, Null, etc
Uh, what?
IMG_1987.jpeg

I was with him until the “real women” bit. That’s genuinely confusing. So if you happen to be stunted in physical growth and very short, and also happen to be on the skinnier side and flat-chested, you just… can’t date anyone? Or else they’re a pedo?
Not to mention, grown women are more than their tits and height. There’s facial features and other such qualities that indicate their age. This is also retarded cause it implies pedophiles won’t go after tall early blooming children, which they absolutely will. A pedo isn’t attracted to a certain look, they’re attracted to the naivety and innocence of children, which they seek to destroy.

Edit:
Some kiwis echo the same sentiment
IMG_1989.jpeg
 
Last edited:
Uh, what?
View attachment 103390
I was with him until the “real women” bit. That’s genuinely confusing. So if you happen to be stunted in physical growth and very short, and also happen to be on the skinnier side and flat-chested, you just… can’t date anyone? Or else they’re a pedo?
Not to mention, grown women are more than their tits and height. There’s facial features and other such qualities that indicate their age. This is also retarded cause it implies pedophiles won’t go after tall early blooming children, which they absolutely will. A pedo isn’t attracted to a certain look, they’re attracted to the naivety and innocence of children, which they seek to destroy.

Edit:
Some kiwis echo the same sentiment
View attachment 103392
>shorter than any women on average
What kind of average? Because some countries have some really tiny average heights for women AND men. And where do people with dwarfism fit?
>doesn't have breasts
Oh so if someone bangs an ex-pooner, or a woman who had to get a mastectomy because of breast cancer they're a pedophile? That's how retarded that logic is.
To think some countries tried to use that same retarded logic to restrict certain kinds of content...
 
>shorter than any women on average
What kind of average? Because some countries have some really tiny average heights for women AND men. And where do people with dwarfism fit?
>doesn't have breasts
Oh so if someone bangs an ex-pooner, or a woman who had to get a mastectomy because of breast cancer they're a pedophile? That's how retarded that logic is.
To think some countries tried to use that same retarded logic to restrict certain kinds of content...
It’s not just that, some women are just born with small breasts. I know someone irl who’s very short and flat-chested, and she does not look like a child cause you can tell she’s older by her voice and facial features. Shes also dating a guy, and it has just dawned on me that I NEEEEED to alert her that he’s a DIRTY PRED
 
There's a very good reason why age of consent laws are concerned only with the age of the person and not what they look like physically.

Kiwi Farms is being retarded if they think age of consent laws should also apply to what you look like physically. I've meet 20 year olds that look like they're age 50 and I've meet 30 year olds that look like they're in high school (everyone has different genes that will affect how you look like physically and your lifestyle choices can also play a role in this).

Age of consent laws are only concerned with your age for a reason and it's for the same reasons why courts of law in liberal democracies have you being innocent unless proven guilty if you are accused of a crime and not the other way around.

Trying to enforce legal policy based on feels over reals is how you get backwards shitholes like North Korea anyway.
 
Last edited:
retards trying to police people over fiction will never stop there they can never be allowed to get what they want

Careful, anyone says that incurs the wrath of Cancer. But I get what you're saying. Subjective laws turn the court of law into a literal court of public opinion. Is some anime woman actually a child? That's 100% up to the jury, which is usually packed with normies that may say "yes that is a child" solely due to the art style.

Get 12 boomers on a jury and pretty much any hentai, even if it's not even close to being loli, can be "CP."
 
Careful, anyone says that incurs the wrath of Cancer. But I get what you're saying. Subjective laws turn the court of law into a literal court of public opinion. Is some anime woman actually a child? That's 100% up to the jury, which is usually packed with normies that may say "yes that is a child" solely due to the art style.
I actually do understand this point, I do feel like there’s a certain point where we have to understand it’s fictional, so there’s sometimes no objective answer to an age, and in that case… Does it even matter? As long as you’re not fapping to the fact that they look like a child, the thing about lolicons is they are indeed fapping to the fact that they look like a child. But if you wanna take Twitter drama like the whole “Is it pedophilic to fap to Pomni?” thing, that’s dumb cause the character is just a cartoon blob, of course she’s short and flat chested. And 90% of people thirsting after her redraw her to look more like a 25 year old woman, whom she canonically is.

Or take the whole tumblr “aging up” drama, where people will take canonically child characters and “age them up” to be adults in appearance and personality, for various reasons that can include porn. Some people said “It’s pedophilic cause they’re canonically children” as if they’re real people and not figments of imagination you can rewrite and twist however you want.

I understand the frustration, and I understand the paranoia, but there’s a certain point where you have to go outside and understand you’re fighting for the rights of actual hallucinations. Lolicon is bad cause someone who brags about fapping to childlike characters sounds dangerous, but when the answer is more ambiguous, imo the answer just dosent matter.

All in all I think people need to chill the fuck out when it comes to “ethical gooning”.
 
I actually do understand this point, I do feel like there’s a certain point where we have to understand it’s fictional, so there’s sometimes no objective answer to an age, and in that case… Does it even matter? As long as you’re not fapping to the fact that they look like a child, the thing about lolicons is they are indeed fapping to the fact that they look like a child. But if you wanna take Twitter drama like the whole “Is it pedophilic to fap to Pomni?” thing, that’s dumb cause the character is just a cartoon blob, of course she’s short and flat chested. And 90% of people thirsting after her redraw her to look more like a 25 year old woman, whom she canonically is.

Or take the whole tumblr “aging up” drama, where people will take canonically child characters and “age them up” to be adults in appearance and personality, for various reasons that can include porn. Some people said “It’s pedophilic cause they’re canonically children” as if they’re real people and not figments of imagination you can rewrite and twist however you want.

I understand the frustration, and I understand the paranoia, but there’s a certain point where you have to go outside and understand you’re fighting for the rights of actual hallucinations. Lolicon is bad cause someone who brags about fapping to childlike characters sounds dangerous, but when the answer is more ambiguous, imo the answer just dosent matter.

All in all I think people need to chill the fuck out when it comes to “ethical gooning”.

Don't get me wrong, it's still degenerate as fuck. Just like diaperfurs.

Though the diaperfurs are probably worse given how infamous the furry community is just in general.
 
Back
Top Bottom