• All races, religions, ethnicities, gay/straight, CIS/Trans, Gender-fluid/Gender-static, Neurodiverse. We don't care. If you can swing with us: You are one of us.

    Disclaimer: Opinions expressed on this forum are the that of the individual and don't necessarily reflect an official postition by Onionfarms.

KF Gossip 🗣️🦻🏼 KF General 2.0 / Green reddit / catboy ranch 2 Neko shota boogalo / cwcki forums autistic evolution

These threads cover general gossip and interacting with Kiwifarms (openly calling them out).
Subtitle
General Discussion: users, bad takes, jannys, Null, etc
pikachudidnothingwrong gives a reasonable argument for the Texas law, gets negrated since he's not going full Spanish Inquisition and gets accused of being a pedophile.
pika.png

wat.png


:Null THE MILLIONS OF RAPED CHILDREN REEEEEEEE
jfcjosh.png

When did they defend CP? :takeyourmeds:
esl.png


I will protect the neko shota broken dick gooner with my life!
keepsuckinghiscock.png

suck-wwe.gif

Should there be a separate thread for that thread and the "everyone that doesn't fully agree with me is a lolicon and has CP in their drives!" users? I can predict this purity spiral is going to end with all the accusers turning out to have even worse shit in their hard drives they accuse others of having.

For the record, I don't think stuff like Berserk or Goblin slayer belongs in K-12 schools either for very obvious reasons.
They're seinen series (made for adults), they shouldn't be there in the first place!
 
Last edited:
My problem with this line of thinking is that we know that it wouldn't stop with pornography, as we see these people cry about non-pornographic media being "problematic" a lot of the time, and outright defending censorship of stuff that isn't porn (and if it isn't, we will see the goalpost shifting). At least the way that I see it, them insisting it's not about drawings, just to then say something completely different in the thread (goalpost shifting), it just comes off as gaslighting to me. As for Welper, dude must has some skeletons in his closet. That and such an inflated ego to call that the "best source of information on lolicons on the internet". I guess being SSRI-addled and on the verge of suicide will cause any sort of e-drama to come off as significant to their lives.

This site is really living up to the "SomethingAwful successor" moniker.
Should there be a separate thread for that thread and the "everyone that doesn't fully agree with me is a lolicon and has CP in their drives!" users? I can predict this purity spiral is going to end with all the accusers turning out to have even worse shit in their hard drives they accuse others of having.
That would frankly be interesting to watch go down. Watch the entire site's users canalize themselves.
 
My problem with this line of thinking is that we know that it wouldn't stop with pornography, as we see these people cry about non-pornographic media being "problematic" a lot of the time, and outright defending censorship of stuff that isn't porn (and if it isn't, we will see the goalpost shifting). At least the way that I see it, them insisting it's not about drawings, just to then say something completely different in the thread (goalpost shifting), it just comes off as gaslighting to me. As for Welper, dude must has some skeletons in his closet. That and such an inflated ego to call that the "best source of information on lolicons on the internet". I guess being SSRI-addled and on the verge of suicide will cause any sort of e-drama to come off as significant to their lives.

This site is really living up to the "SomethingAwful successor" moniker.

That would frankly be interesting to watch go down. Watch the entire site's users canalize themselves.
Null living up to his name. lol
 
Null locked this for the reason "internal shitflinging is not allowed and you're all just lying for drama"
View attachment 86237
What lies have you guys noticed (if any)? The soyblog stuff is all true so I took it at face value. And there's been the "Username Hall of Shame" which is also infighting but that's okay apparently.
He probably didn't want people scaring off newfags or setting off the soyteens and the thread started going after oldfags shortly before Null locked it.
 
pikachudidnothingwrong gives a reasonable argument for the Texas law, gets negrated since he's not going full Spanish Inquisition and gets accused of being a pedophile.
View attachment 86218
View attachment 86216

:Null THE MILLIONS OF RAPED CHILDREN REEEEEEEEView attachment 86217
When did they defend CP? :takeyourmeds:
View attachment 86219

I will protect the neko shota broken dick gooner with my life!
View attachment 86220
View attachment 86221
Should there be a separate thread for that thread and the "everyone that doesn't fully agree with me is a lolicon and has CP in their drives!" users? I can predict this purity spiral is going to end with all the accusers turning out to have even worse shit in their hard drives they accuse others of having.


They're seinen series (made for adults), they shouldn't be there in the first place!
So this is a perfect example of the 'Appeal from Authority' fallacy and a good sign that someone is likely a midwit.

"Jersh is the owner and admin of Kiwi Farms, Jersh has dealt with the law before, therefore Jersh is an expert."

So what the Appeal from Authority fallacy states that midwits will often pick and choose what "experts" or other figures of authority they want to use to back up their confirmation biases. This is peak midwittery because cherry picking what you want to confirm your personal beliefs as the 'Be all, End All' for an argument is not an argument. Figures of authority are also subject to be proven wrong when presented with objective reality.

Let me provide my own example of why Appeal from Authority to try to win an argument is a weak ass way to win an argument:

"Richard Dawkins is an evolutionary biologist, Richard Dawkins is an atheist, therefore all atheists are smart."

While there is no denying that Richard Dawkins is a brilliant evolutionary biologist and has contributed much to the field of Biology, that doesn't mean Richard Dawkins is an expert in everything. Richard Dawkins has been rightfully criticized for his dumb hot takes when it comes to politics and social issues where people from both the Left and the Right often rip on Richard Dawkins for his shitty takes on world issues; Richard Dawkins being an atheist doesn't make him any smarter or better than a homeless man with a meth addiction and Richard Dawkins being an atheist doesn't mean every atheist in the world is smart (anyone that was on the Internet during the 2010's will know how atheists can be just as retarded as their religious counterparts).

Another example would be like how the late Stockton Rush thought he was an expert in submersibles because he used to work in airplane engineering and he thought the ocean exploration business would be just like the airplane industry (look how that worked out for him when he rode inside Oceangate Titan for the final time).

Jersh is not the 'Be All, End All' of how the Internet works. There's no denying that Jersh is tech savvy and knows how to run a website (most of the time) but this doesn't mean Jersh is an expert in other fields outside of his expertise.
 
Last edited:
They act like anyone needs to see their retarded threads that could be summed up in a 5 minute video at best. YouTube with all the censorship is still more effective than kiwifarms at exposing lolcows. They quit being relevant long ago.
 
Newfaggot asks why anyone would splinter KF.
Infinite number of reasons, in all frankness. The main one being that Null treats KF as his overglorified blog, and retarded as the farms userbase is, even they have better things to do than listen to him shriek like a yenta 24/7. Null also has a long history of trying - and failing miserably - at trying to sniff out any perceived competitors to his blog; MPC (MyPostingCareer), SASS/Something Sensitive, Dead Horse Interchange and this very forum are just some of the few examples.
 
Infinite number of reasons, in all frankness. The main one being that Null treats KF as his overglorified blog, and retarded as the farms userbase is, even they have better things to do than listen to him shriek like a yenta 24/7. Null also has a long history of trying - and failing miserably - at trying to sniff out any perceived competitors to his blog; MPC (MyPostingCareer), SASS/Something Sensitive, Dead Horse Interchange and this very forum are just some of the few examples.
Even fucking then, I'd still be question why parrot Twitter of all things (even though it technically is twitter a little bit in a sense). I don't know about the afore-mentioned sites you listed but they probably were a lot better than KF I'm sure.
 
So this is a perfect example of the 'Appeal from Authority' fallacy and a good sign that someone is likely a midwit.

"Jersh is the owner and admin of Kiwi Farms, Jersh has dealt with the law before, therefore Jersh is an expert."

So what the Appeal from Authority fallacy states that midwits will often pick and choose what "experts" or other figures of authority they want to use to back up their confirmation biases. This is peak midwittery because cherry picking what you want to confirm your personal beliefs as the 'Be all, End All' for an argument is not an argument. Figures of authority are also subject to be proven wrong when presented with objective reality.

Let me provide my own example of why Appeal from Authority to try to win an argument is a weak ass way to win an argument:

"Richard Dawkins is an evolutionary biologist, Richard Dawkins is an atheist, therefore all atheists are smart."

While there is no denying that Richard Dawkins is a brilliant evolutionary biologist and has contributed much to the field of Biology, that doesn't mean Richard Dawkins is an expert in everything. Richard Dawkins has been rightfully criticized for his dumb hot takes when it comes to politics and social issues where people from both the Left and the Right often rip on Richard Dawkins for his shitty takes on world issues; Richard Dawkins being an atheist doesn't make him any smarter or better than a homeless man with a meth addiction and Richard Dawkins being an atheist doesn't mean every atheist in the world is smart (anyone that was on the Internet during the 2010's will know how atheists can be just as retarded as their religious counterparts).

Another example would be like how the late Stockton Rush thought he was an expert in submersibles because he used to work in airplane engineering and he thought the ocean exploration business would be just like the airplane industry (look how that worked out for him when he rode inside Oceangate Titan for the final time).

Jersh is not the 'Be All, End All' of how the Internet works. There's no denying that Jersh is tech savvy and knows how to run a website (most of the time) but this doesn't mean Jersh is an expert in other fields outside of his expertise.

The way you dunked on the midwits and explained the Appeal from Authority fallacy reminded me of MentisWave.
 
Splinters for any community exists and often the main reason is that they're usually not satisfied with the way things were being run with the main community.

This doesn't just apply to Kiwi Farms, this applies to virtually every community you see on the Internet.

So why does Onionfarms exists? Because Jersh scares away people or unfairly bans his own users over the dumbest reasons ever.
 
Back
Top Bottom