The Real Sam Asp Glassen
I fuck MylarBalloons like they are my favorite anime characters.
Hellovan Onion
I on't care about this.We can sit here and discuss the ethics of lolicon in of itself but what we're seeing here is seeing Kiwis make the classic midwit argument known as the Authoritarian's Fallacy ("The Government made something illegal/legal so therefore it must be ethical"). A lot of people (online and IRL) make this classic mistake because they confuse Ethics (something in philosophy that doesn't contradict itself very often) with law (something that often contradicts itself and is always changing due to changes in attitudes towards that particular thing).
A classic example of this was Jim Crow laws where before the Civil Rights movement, they were justified because many saw them as a way to preserve racial purity and to prevent whites from becoming corrupted by black people (and also to spite the efforts from the Reconstruction Era after the American Civil War). Jim Crow was done away with because people realized the old Jim Crow laws were a load of horseshit that often gave the state the power to enact violence on people they didn't like )in this case blacks) and directly marginalized African Americans (Jim Crow was done away with because they were blatantly unethical).
If you want another example of why Ethics and Law are not the same thing, you can take the Armenian genocide as another example where the Truks (when they were the Ottoman Empire) genocided Amerninians because they refused to convert to Islam so the Turks got the state seal of approval to murder a bunch of Christians for not wanting to follow the words of Muhammad. This is why Ethics and Law are not the same thing because you would somehow have to justify things like Genocide as being Ethical because the state says so. Funny enough, the Authoritarian Fallacy is the same nonsense that many left-wing Breadtubers believe in because they know they can abuse their power using this kind of bullshit circular reasoning if they were to ever gain power to establish their version of communism.
It doesn't take more than a minute for any rational person to look at this and realize why this way of arguing doesn't hold any water. You would think Kiwi Farms would know this by now because they were the victim of this kind of bullshit reasoning not too long ago; the Christchurch shooting. If you recall, when Brenton Tarrant commit an act of mass murder towards a group of Muslim praying in a mosque, there were several world governments (especially New Zealand) where they used the opportunity to justify their anti-hate speech laws and go on a censorship spree to censor the Internet by censoring any perceived far-right content (especially with New Zealand trying to take down the GoPro footage of Brenton Tarrant gunning down Muslims) and many left-wingers were like "See? Laws that criminalize hate speech are good because they punish and prevent violent radicalization by the Extreme Right! We need to enact a global version of the Patriot Act for the Internet to stop the Right everyone!" to justify censoring the Internet as we know it.
Now going back to the topic at hand. Can we discuss the ethics of lolicon in the philosophical sense? Sure and no one stopping you from doing so. But if you're going to discuss this topic where you're going to use the 'muh-law = ethics' argument then you're going to look like a retard that thinks 2 + 2 = 5. If you ask me, a lot of the people on Kiwi Farms are no different from retards like Vaush where he also confuses law for ethics to justify his nonsense as well. It also shows how these people think where if they were to ever gain political power then they're going to make Stalin look like a walk in the park.