Ashley On The Dinner Table Fights with Ashley

[Bear Hammer]

Please do not call @Home a nigger.

Niggers are loud, dirty and ghetto.

She is nice, elegant and modest

 

[IKOL]

Please do not call @Home a nigger.

Niggers are loud, dirty and ghetto.

So, she's a nigger(rette).

Because lying is being loud and dirty.
And her ways of "proving" somethings are exactly ghetto. "Trust me they X Y Z or else!"

 

[Bear Hammer]

So, she's a nigger(rette).

Because lying is being loud and dirty.
And her ways of "proving" somethings are exactly ghetto. "Trust me they X Y Z or else!"

There's really no point in arguing with her though.

She's not gonna change her mind unless you bring more evidence.

You should probably just put her on ignore and move on.

Really both of you are making the mistake of emotionally activated posting, you might want to take a break.

 

[IKOL]

There's really no point in arguing with her though.

Agreed, thick skull but a brain of a flee, there's no point arguing with such individuals.
And yet, I do argue because believe it or not, false accusations are serious matter.

Just correct me if I'm wrong but I doubt if someone would say you or one of your relatives are zoophile and take horse rod up your ass you'd take it lightly. You'd rather think how you can beat the living shit out of a faggot said such thing, yes?

She's not gonna change her mind unless you bring more evidence.

And what fuckin' evidence are expected from me, I've already told EVERYTHING, explained every part of a thing, expressed what have I felt then and now. There's no further proof of anything because there are no proofs that I've commited a crime at all, only blatant assumptions of the worst by people with no knowing of common sense present.

Really both of you are making the mistake of emotionally activated posting, you might want to take a break.

I'm good. She should resign and leave this site though. Put the money where her dirty mouth is.

 

[Home]

Really both of you are making the mistake of emotionally activated posting, you might want to take a break.

Honestly you’re right and I apologize. I noticed I was getting mad and it’s unprofessional and unfair.

View attachment 109285

So you’re just the pony guy now. Nice.

Again why you assume it was porn? WHY ARE YOU ASSUMING IT WAS, BY ANY MERITS, PORN OR SOMETHING EVER REMOTELY SEXUAL? WHY WOULD YOU SUGGEST THAT IF YOU AREN'T FUCKED UP IN YER NIGGER HEAD YOURSELF.

I will at least respond to this. Once again I am going off your words, you joked and said she was sending you pictures that would “get you in trouble” and that what you were doing was “risky”. How would normal selfies get you in trouble?

yes, NIGGER. I called her that, because, belive it or not, at moment when we got closer she was a teen and LIED she was adult. Again niggerette, I'm not DrDisrespect and I call things and people for what they are, in relation to moments when and how something have happened.

I’m not talking about her, I’m talking about the pictures. You called the girl sending the “pictures” a teenager and acted like the pictures were scandalous in some sense.

That's coming from someone who goes by "if I there's no proof I'll made shit up and die on this hill" textbook of the likes of those BPD cunts that were accusing Turkey Tom of various unpleasant things.

When did I say that? The proof I have is from your mouth. I’m asking for evidence that you’re innocent. I brought screenshots, where are yours?

So, what YOU have to hide then, I wonder?

Not much. I kinda liked the 90s Mario movie, most scandalous thing about me.

No.
Happy? Now get out. You threatened Kengle you quit, do that. And never return. Again, I repeat myself, you bring no positive value to this forum.

1. I thought she blackmailed you to stay? Are you retracting that now?
2. I didn’t threaten Ken, Ken won’t die if I leave. He can live without me.

That's nice and all but that's a lie again. You can't ban me because you have no solid proof I'm some monster in human body that thirsts over kids.

You said it not me ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

There's just none of it, either physically or virtually because your narrative is built on, again, half-truths and obvious bullshit.

Just give me a screenshot of innocence, do you have that at least? We can go from there.

Let’s both take five. In that time, you can get that evidence. Or not, whatever.

 

[IKOL]

Once again I am going off your words,

You don't. You straight up made unhinged assumptions because you can't help yourself but thing that if something is written and not proven it must be true so you're eligible to think whatever morbid shit you want.

you joked and said she was sending you pictures that would “get you in trouble” and that what you were doing was “risky”. How would normal selfies get you in trouble?

Again why have you assumed it was child porn? There's no other explanation but your own fucked up mindset.

And yes, sometimes people tend to send pictures of selves doing, say, self-harm for example, in a matter of speaking even an innocent selfie someone have sent in your DMs may cause a huge load of problems. You may not happen to have such things in life but I do know some people who got exactly that. Trouble. For just selfies and photos of someone who sent 'em these in DMs, willingly.

You called the girl sending the “pictures” a teenager and acted like the pictures were scandalous in some sense.

Why yes, because again getting pictures from someone, even if these are safe, can get you into scandal. Happened. And when it happened I've managed to defend myself, 'sides I had some lads on my side that knew me well enough and knew I wouldn't lie because at times and matters like this bullshit lead to nowhere but loathe.

So you have to ask yourself why am I hostile to you.

1. I thought she blackmailed you to stay? Are you retracting that now?

1. Re-read your own fuckin' question again.
You asked if I had anything ever remotely sexual or romantic with her. Answer is "no". She blackmailed me, doesn't mean we had anything intimate after I've got to know she lied about age.

2. I didn’t threaten Ken, Ken won’t die if I leave. He can live without me.

>I didn't threaten Ken

RRRREALLY? Let's look back at his recent topic about age segregation and~

oh Gosh golly, you do... tsk. That's pre-emptive threat, niggerrette. You may argue it isn't but it's clearly the one.
Again, assuming the worst and saying you'll leave if it get's too much... too much of what, exactly?
Again I might to invoke @C.S.O. esq, @The Crimson Fucker and @faux90skid here which can get into janny chat history and show that you've threatened to leave because I was still a mod after freya crashed out over me and Crimson calling her out on her aoc bullshit. Exact bullshit you've been calling her out on, too, I do remember that.

 

[IKOL]

You said it not me ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

Again, you have nothing that can solidify your words and excuse you for calling me names.

I have all the means to call you racial slurs though thanks to your own words and actions. Funny.

Just give me a screenshot of innocence, do you have that at least? We can go from there.

You really expect me to go back in time and return to 2019-2020 when the hot phase of this bullshit went and do a screen cap of anything and then return back to you through the time stream?

Again, you either incapable of reading or just refuse to. There's none, anymore. On either side. Those that accuse me of shit haven't been there and only assume what was and what not.
I went through fuckin' Hell and back few times, proving that I'm not as bad as every faggot portrays me, my only fault was that I haven't recognised that I've been lied to when I should have and that I've went along with bullshitry of that girl. and STILL there are the likes of you or that pinballfaggot2000 who make a fucking scene and make shit up.

 

[Meatwad]

"Btw, the reason why I haven’t banned IKOL yet is that I’m still waiting for legit evidence of his innocence."
Good Lord. That's not how it works. You need evidence that he's guilty, not innocent. The burden of proof is on the accuser. How do you not know this?

 

[IKOL]

"Btw, the reason why I haven’t banned IKOL yet is that I’m still waiting for legit evidence of his innocence."
Good Lord. That's not how it works. You need evidence that he's guilty, not innocent. The burden of proof is on the accuser. How do you not know this?

1. @Home is black
2. is zoomer.

I think you'll figure the rest.

 

[Home]

"Btw, the reason why I haven’t banned IKOL yet is that I’m still waiting for legit evidence of his innocence."
Good Lord. That's not how it works. You need evidence that he's guilty, not innocent. The burden of proof is on the accuser. How do you not know this?

You seem new. There's a whole thread of evidence on IKOL, he was demodded because of that evidence. If you look through my posting history, you'll find I posted some of it. Most of the evidence is screenshots of things he himself has said. When I said "I'm looking for evidence to dispute it" what I meant was that I have screenshot evidence of pred behavior, yet everyone saying he's innocent only has word of mouth. And that word of mouth sums up to "He's a nice guy, c'mon.". It doesn't help that everyone here has chronic amnesia, and the moment I'm not shoving the screenshots directly in their face, they forget they exist and suddenly the narrative is back to "No evidence".

 

[Home]

oh Gosh golly, you do... tsk. That's pre-emptive threat, niggerrette

I'm threatening him by promising to ban minors? Is banning minors bad?

You asked if I had anything ever remotely sexual or romantic with her. Answer is "no". She blackmailed me, doesn't mean we had anything intimate after I've got to know she lied about age.

She "blackmailed" you because she wanted to stay together, and so you never blocked her. That is implicitly agreeing to continue dating her.

 

[IKOL]

There's a whole thread of evidence on IKOL, he was demodded because of that evidence.

Unlucky for you I was in touch with others regarding my de-modding.
Again, you're full of shit and don't even try to be truthful for a minute.

I'm threatening him by promising to ban minors? Is banning minors bad?

You were threatening him because the burden of your mod duties would've become unsustainable, because of his allowance to a surge of teens there. Which we both know won't happen. Soyteens don't see this place appealing, neither would most of the zoomers\alpha, just because Ken made half-assed celebrity schere subforum sections won't bring young blood here.
Christ just look at site' design, it's an immediate turnoff.
Banning minors aint bad, what's bad is yapping that you'll quit if things go Ken's way (well knowing they won't), your post had exactly this implication

She "blackmailed" you because she wanted to stay together,

And I didn't because she was batshit unhinged. She was alright at first days when we just started to chat. Farther it went - worse it got.
I had no intentions to live or deal with mentally unwell cunt that was having constant moodshifts and wasn't able to process that "no" means "no". She had a lot of fucked up things about her that I was getting to know along the way.
Won't discuss it in details, it stays between me and her.

and so you never blocked her.

I did, and not once. She knew how to reach me, and through whom. That was a problem, as well as some of her tendencies.
And she used that against me too, from time to time.

That is implicitly agreeing to continue dating her.

I never asked for continuing those relationships, again you imply bullshit that comes from your delusions, not my words.