Cryptocurrency: Scam or Simply Dumb?

[nobodyworthwhile]

Sorry I didn't see if there was already a topic.

Its been weird, I first heard about Bitcoin when it was still niche and it sounded like a scam, but now you can find kiosks for it at brick and mortar stores.

And I'm just thinking this can't last. The whole idea is its fake digital money, but the problem is its not backed by anything, and being digital, that means that eventually somebody is gonna hack it, or else computers that are key parts of the blockchain might be hit with an EMP or just get too close to a magnet, and suddenly the whole thing is worthless.

What do you think?

 

[BurnerAccount333]

And I'm just thinking this can't last. The whole idea is its fake digital money, but the problem is its not backed by anything, and being digital, that means that eventually somebody is gonna hack it, or else computers that are key parts of the blockchain might be hit with an EMP or just get too close to a magnet, and suddenly the whole thing is worthless.

What do you think?

The US dollar currently is no longer backed by gold, or silver.
In fact it's backed by absolutely nothing.
Money in general is only backed by the belief of value it has, we exchange dollars because we understand that this medium of payment allows me to trade for what I want with this money.

As for hacking, and other attacks, I don't know. To me I don't like crypto because it's meant to be the private currency but it actually have more tracking built in making it incredibly easy to track by complete strangers. Least credit cards is realistically only tracked by bankers.

 

[The Gays From LA]

Anything can be a means of exchange if enough people believe in it and agree to participate in it, whether it's backed by anything or absolutely nothing.

For me one of the main reasons not to use or trust bitcoin is that, supposedly, no one knows who actually started it or where the alleged creator of bitcoin currently is. It was supposedly started by some Asian guy (I can't recall his name at the top of my head) who has since seemingly disappeared off the face of the earth. I don't trust that. That whole story makes bitcoin suspicious from the get-go for me. Who tought it was necessary to launch this into the world? The Japanese Mafia? China? Who? I know who started the internet and to what end (DARPA/the American military, cos they needed a decentralized means of communication in the event of a nuclear war), I still don't know who's behind bitcoin or why they did it.

The main reason that most regular people opt out of trying out cryptocurrency is the complexity (it's really a currency for nerds, there's no way the average normie is every going to get into "bitcoin mining"), the false promises of privacy when it's very obviously not private as BurnerAccount pointed out, the fact that it's still taxed by your government, etc. Most of the stuff I want to buy I can buy with either cash or a card, so why would I go through the hassle of using crypto, unless it's to flash my nerd/darknet credentials? (And why would you do that if you really want to be incognito with your transactions?)

The only situation where crypto-money might be handy is in an extreme situation like the War in Ukraine or if your relative got kidnapped and you need to pay a ransom to the kidnappers or something. A number of Russian Youtubers who didn't want to be conscripted bought their way out of Russia and managed to stay out of the country after fleeing thanks to bitcoin donations, which was their only means of payment their Russian bank cards were rejected abroad due to the sanctions. I can imagine people being very glad they got into bitcoin in such a situation.

But still, no matter how noble you think this is, or how justifiable you think this use of bitcoin is for someone escaping sure death in a war... you're still using bitcoin to break the law essentially, thus contributing to its already questionable status as a black market currency used for unlawful transactions. Should someone's ability to escape sure death in a war be contingent on whether they're terminally online enough to get into bitcoin?

 

[Crimson Fucker]

The fact they are decentralized is not simply a positive but also a flaw. Often times with theft the thief is considered the new owner as seen in previous cases. Also they are usually a rug pull mlm pyramid scheme.

 

[ecto_chasm]

I think it’s good for buying drugs on Tor and that’s IT. Trying to use it to invest and make money is a fool’s game.

 

[Cavalier Cipolla]

Crypto shekels are nothing more but a tool. Or investment.

There's bad investments and good investments. Use your own brain.

And they can be used for good purposes, such as funding in some authoritarian regimes swept by sanctions and or a shit economy, without the guv'ment doing some shit to you.

They can also be used for more shady purposes. Like buying some sus amogus substances and guns where they are not really legal.


About crypto shekels tho, I just hopped on the farms to tell you about the idea of making a Byuu (remember him?) crypto coin. For the lulz.

 

[TheCIAGlowsInTheDark]

The only cryptocurrency worth using is Monero since it fulfills the criteria of what crypto is suppose to be.

Bitcoin may be anonymous but it's not private and anyone can look at the blockchain to see where said Bitcoin comes and goes.

Shitcoins like Doge are done for the memes but it's a bad investment to invest your time and energy in a meme many won't remember years from now. It's also a bad idea to invest in shitcoins anyway since they won't go anywhere.

Monero is private, secure, and anonymous and the best part is that you just need a CPU to mine it compared to other cryptocurrencies where you often need a GPU to earn some crypto.

The more people that use Monero on the Internet, the more the glowies and the big banks will lose their control over the masses.