I'm just saying, if someone posted child porn and bragged about having it on their computer, people would rightfully call them a pedophile and it would be fair to assume that of them. Since real pedophiles do that.
I think it would be fair to assume similar things about people who brag about having videos of people sexually abusing animals.
Saying that it's not the same because it was done "ironically" or "shitposting" is skibidi fag logic btw.