Debate user @yeshull/@SchizoNetwork on the morality of morality

[Noghoul]

Dr Hans-Georg Moeller lecturer in Cork University and Macau University and a ginger male market failure has convinced me that morality is morally wrong.
Here's the abstract of his book titled "The Moral Cuck Fool: A Case For Amorality":

Justice, equality, and righteousness these are some of our greatest moral convictions. Yet in times of social conflict, morals can become rigid, making religious war, ethnic cleansing, and political purges possible. Morality, therefore, can be viewed as pathology-a rhetorical, psychological, and social tool that is used and abused as a weapon.

An expert on Eastern philosophies and social systems theory, Hans-Georg Moeller questions the perceived goodness of morality and those who claim morality is inherently positive. Critiquing the ethical "fanaticism" of Western moralists, such as Immanuel Kant, Lawrence Kohlberg, John Rawls, and the utilitarians, Moeller points to the absurd fundamentalisms and impracticable prescriptions arising from definitions of good. Instead he advances a theory of "moral foolishness," or moral asceticism, extracted from the "amoral" philosophers of East Asia and such thinkers as Ludwig Wittgenstein and Niklas Luhmann. The moral fool doesn't understand why ethics are necessarily good, and he isn't convinced that the moral perspective is always positive. In this way he is like most people, and Moeller defends this foolishness against ethical pathologies that support the death penalty, just wars, and even Jerry Springer's crude moral theater. Comparing and contrasting the religious philosophies of Christianity, Daoism, and Zen Buddhism, Moeller presents a persuasive argument in favor of amorality.

Here's 2 pictures of the forementioned ginger male market failure that I found somewhat funny:

Discuss.

 

[Bookmark Cuck]

No thank you, but I apprecate the offer all the same.

 

[SIGSEGV]

Morality is based, but sometimes it can be cringe depending on my mood.

 

[Bookmark Cuck]

Morality is based, but sometimes it can be cringe depending on my mood.

Based on what SIGSEGV?

 

[TheTrue&HonestAshleyJankowski]

Based on what SIGSEGV?

Chicken Tendies.

 

[SIGSEGV]

Based on what SIGSEGV?

My cock.

 

[Noghoul]

No thank you, but I apprecate the offer all the same.

No need to thank... well actually yes, give me all the praise and thanks in the known universe.

Morality is based, but sometimes it can be cringe depending on my mood.

Based and Nietzschean-Ubermensch pilled

My cock.

Your cock is fat small and I would not have sex with it.

 

[Noghoul]

Based on what SIGSEGV?

DUHHH BASED!!!! DUHHH BASED!!???!!1 BASED!!!!! IS THAT ALL YOU SHITPOSTING FUCKS CAN SAY!!??? DURR BASED BASED BASED CRINGE CRINGE BASED BASED CRINGE CRINGE CRINGE BASED CRINGE I FEEL LIKE IM IN A FUCKING ASYLUM FULL OF DEMENTIA RIDDEN OLD PEOPLE THAT CAN DO NOTHING BUT REPEAT THE SAME FUCKING WORDS ON LOOP LIKE A FUCKING BROKEN RECORD CRINGE CRINGE CRINGE BASED BASED CRINGE ONIONS ONIONS ONIONS SNOYY ONIONS LOL ONIONS!!! CRINGE!!!1 BOOMER!! LE ZOOMER!!!! I AM BOOMER!!!! NO ZOOM ZOOM ZOOMIES ZOOMER GOING ZOOMIES AHGHGH I FUCKING HATE THE INTERNET SO GODDAMN MUCH FUCKJK YOU SHITPOST I HONEST TO GOD HOPE YOUR MOTHER CHOKES ON HER OWN FECES IN HELL YOU COCKSUCKER VUT OHHH I KNOWM MY POST IS CRINGE ISNT IT?? CRINGE CRINGE CRINGR CRINGEY BASED CRINGE BASED REDDIT REDDIT CRINGE ZOOM CRINGE ONIONS REDDIT BASED BASED!!!!!!

 

[naught]

Sounds like a rule cuck.

 

[Noghoul]

Sounds like a rule cuck.

No, you.

 

[TheTrue&HonestAshleyJankowski]

@Fromtheevenblackerdepths your kids are fat and I would not have sex with them.
I wouldn't even rape them.

What does this mean?

 

[Noghoul]

What does this mean?

it means that your kids are fat and I wouldn't have sex with them

 

[TheTrue&HonestAshleyJankowski]

it means that your kids are fat and I wouldn't have sex with them

I agree on both ends if that's the case.