Shit Flinging Autism

[Ishtar]

Actually that is not the case at all that you have to be 18 to join a forum. However there are certain measures you have to take if soneone who registers is under 13. As it stands, you have to be 13 to join Facebook, you have to be 13 to join Twitter. You have to be 18 to join Gab. There is no 18 requirement for celebrity forums. We have the same initials (OF) as Only Fans which is specifically an adult sites (being a part of the adult industry). We are a gossip and discussion forum.We are not a part of the "Adult Industry". Yes 4chan has an 18 signup and ED Forums has an 18 signup. But I am trying to distance ourselves from forums such as ED.

You should. ED is too good for the autistic retards on here

 

[nothingeverhappens]

This is "IG goonbait"

Also this guy is so blindly pro aislop that he can't understand why everyone dislikes the shitty DLSS 5 presentation and calls you a tranny if you dislike it because only trannies dislike aislop (lolno the bad reception is almost universal), meanwhile all replies to his shit thread have been full "fuck off it looks horrendous" with exactly the same two proaisloppers negrating everyone but proaislopper OP (he's also been almost universally negrated, save for his two fellow proaisloppers).

 

[Home]

Home was apparently groomed by Ashley

Tf?
No I wasn’t. She also never asked for my age. She already knew I’m in my early 20s. The misinfo is crazy.

Ashley never groomed me, she just started sperging like a psychopath and kept specifying that I was “young”. She’s not a groomer, she’s just unstable and shouldn’t be around kids because kids shouldn’t be around unstable people.

 

[Onion NullOnion Null is verified member.]

Tf?
No I wasn’t. She also never asked for my age. She already knew I’m in my early 20s. The misinfo is crazy.

Ashley never groomed me, she just started sperging like a psychopath and kept specifying that I was “young”. She’s not a groomer, she’s just unstable and shouldn’t be around kids because kids shouldn’t be around unstable people.

I agree with this. I can't imagine what she would be like if she had kids.

 

[Onion NullOnion Null is verified member.]

You should. ED is too good for the autistic retards on here

No we are too good for ED.

 

[Home]

I agree with this.

THEN MAYBE
DON’T MAKE
THE MINIMUM AGE
ON YOUR FUCKING WEBSITE
SEVENTEEN

 

[IKOL]

I agree with this. I can't imagine what she would be like if she had kids.

Dude that's... completely irrevelant.
'Sides speaking of age reg topic again: absolutely everyone is against that, so maybe you should consider that people under 18 don't have a place here for good reason? Fuck I'd restrict it to over 21 to be fair.
If you want teen-oriented site this train is somewhat out the city shores for good, for a long while. Youth are not interested in yee yee ass forums, they reside in brainrot generators such as tiktok.

You wanna more people to join? Easy task, create a fishing forum and call it uh... I dunno, Tuna Shack? Dolphin Stacks? Shark Cojones? whatever fits.

 

[Bear Hammer]

Does anyone know why Ken is so insistent on letting minors in here even if it makes him look bad, everyone is against it and it gives him no benefit? Has he given a reason why this issue is so important to him?

Hey /pol/, what's kengels endgame?

 

[IKOL]

Does anyone know why Ken is so insistent on letting minors in here even if it makes him look bad and everyone is against it? Has he given a reason why this issue is so important to him?

I could bet it relates to Null somehow but in all seriousness have no fuckin' clue and that fixation on letting teens in is concerning in bad way.

 

[thepeaguy]

she’s just unstable and shouldn’t be around kids because kids shouldn’t be around unstable people.

and yet you slobber uncontrollably for daniel smackhead on multiple posts in here and on Green Reddit. Interesting that, eh?

Does anyone know why Ken is so insistent on letting minors in here even if it makes him look bad, everyone is against it and it gives him no benefit? Has he given a reason why this issue is so important to him?

0 0 is a nonce lover, as posted about yesterday, but he is correct about Ken on all three counts.

Furthermore, Ken has no sentience to speak of. Everything that comes from his mouth is babytalk slop, and no offense to you guys, but yall are numpties for trying to reason with Ken on anything ever. Yall should focus less on trying to make sense of Ken's wankery and more on the fact he alienated nearly all of the good users in here with his perpetual retardation.

I could bet it relates to Null somehow but in all seriousness have no fuckin' clue and that fixation on letting teens in is concerning in bad way.

One thing's for sure is that @Nektar Geist would make for an infinitely better forum owner and manager.

 

[Home]

and yet you slobber uncontrollably for daniel smackhead on multiple posts in here and on Green Reddit. Interesting that, eh?

Can you point out one time I verbally sucked off Daniel. All I said was “We’re on good terms” and y’all took that as an announcement of marriage lmaooo.

 

[Onion NullOnion Null is verified member.]

THEN MAYBE
DON’T MAKE
THE MINIMUM AGE
ON YOUR FUCKING WEBSITE
SEVENTEEN

18 or 17: Ashley is going to do the same thing regardless. How long has she been harassing fnaarf now?

 

[thefrogninja]

Edit: @ipreferpickles is restricted to post here for 3 months to cool his soylent brains off. Do continue this bs everywhere else the only place you'll be able to post will be Tard Cage for actual.

You should not threadban pickleman for calling you a pedo/creep, which to my knowledge not even Kengle disputes. It just looks like you're trying to cover it up. You should just move "off-topic posts" (pickleman was replying to you and others, he was not warned about it either) to a dedicated which is what your buddy Daniel did.

In regards to allowing minors to post on OF. This is inherently an issue so long as NSFW boards are excluded to 18+ accounts. Secondly, sites like Facebook and Youtube require you be 13 to register account. Thirdly, there are no minors on OF. It's literally a non-issue currently. It's just Kengle's ineffectual way of "growing the site" which never works.

 

[thefrogninja]

Does anyone know why Ken is so insistent on letting minors in here even if it makes him look bad, everyone is against it and it gives him no benefit? Has he given a reason why this issue is so important to him?

Hey /pol/, what's kengels endgame?

Kengle doesn't care if people try to paint him, and his users by extension, as condoners of child harm because all of Kengle's arguments have been legitimate. It's respectable, albeit reckless and incredibly stupid.

 

[Onion NullOnion Null is verified member.]

You should not threadban pickleman for calling you a pedo/creep, which to my knowledge not even Kengle disputes. It just looks like you're trying to cover it up. You should just move "off-topic posts" (pickleman was replying to you and others, he was not warned) to a dedicated which is what your buddy Daniel did.

In regards to allowing minors to post on OF. This is not really an inherent issue so long as NSFW boards are excluded to 18+ accounts. Secondly, sites like Facebook and Youtube require you be 13 to register account. Thirdly, there are no minors on OF. It's a non-issue currently. It's just Kengle's ineffectual way of "growing the site" that doesn't work.

I don't have an issue with certain sections such as trendy celebrity section being accessible by near adult (17 or so). The stuff I am putting in the celebrity-sphere comes from gossip channels on X.com that are already accessible to the general public.

AI Generated: Users under the age of 18 represent approximately 2% to 2.4% of the global audience on X (formerly Twitter) as of 2026.

If you were to guess the percentage of people who have slipped in and are under 18 here it would probably be about .5% to about 1.5%.

 

[thefrogninja]

I don't have an issue with certain sections such as trendy celebrity section being accessible by near adult (17 or so). The stuff I am putting in the celebrity-sphere comes from gossip channels on X.com that are already accessible to the general public.

AI Generated: Users under the age of 18 represent approximately 2% to 2.4% of the global audience on X (formerly Twitter) as of 2026.

If you were to guess the percentage of people who have slipped in and are under 18 here it would probably be about .5% to about 1.5%.

I want to reiterate that I think all your arguments have been valid, legitimate, and currently employed by more popular websites. People just want to cause drama and controversy where there is none currently. This isn't a website like KF where you can easily find animal torture, zoo porn, and revenge porn. However, it is still best to restrict the signup age to 18 and above so people cannot paint you, and your users by extension, as "endangering children." (Pickleman's threadbans should also be rescinded.)

 

[Boobie Bomb]

Pretty much this, it became too much. I can only give a guy so many chances.

You still have some friends here. Me.

 

[Onion NullOnion Null is verified member.]

I want to reiterate that I think all your arguments have been valid, legitimate, and currently employed by more popular websites. People just want to cause drama and controversy where there is none currently. However, it is still best to restrict the signup age to 18 and above so people can paint you, and your users by extension, as condoners of child harm. (Pickleman's threadbans should also be rescinded.)

I may be looking at a marketing strategy. Having a signup age of 18 tends to be associated with the adult industry or extremist sites. I don't want Onionfarms to be associated with this. There is a difference between Mature (17) and AO (Adults Only 18+).

 

[Onion NullOnion Null is verified member.]

I don't want anyone banned. You haven't done anything banworthy IMO I just wanna know the truth of the whole ipreferpickles debacle. Also, me and IKOL are not "buddies" I spoke up against bullshit when I saw it but I don't actually know them outside of any Onion Farms threads.

What Daniel wanted was to try and take over the forum.

 

[thepeaguy]

You should just move "off-topic posts" (pickleman was replying to you and others, he was not warned about it either) to a dedicated thread

Tbh I don't blame staff for thread banning picklenancy, even if I don't agree with it myself. He is so (cmon lets face it) insufferably autistic and it's not even just cuz of his sissy fighting with IKOL. Pickle is denser than concrete and more often than not he makes this thread and Nooly Nool thread downright unreadable, by spamming the same "guise the lefties are taking over KF" "Nool is despairing over yank midterms" drivel over and over and over again.
That said, yes its best to simply segregate pickles' dumber than dogshite posts to their own thread instead of outright depriving him of a voice, but thats up to @Onion Null to decide when and if he stops talking to a wall with fresh paint on it.