Vingle
Remarkable Onion
I've never done that?Sooooooo. You were ok with wanking to images of kids... until you found out that... nah dude.
I've never done that?Sooooooo. You were ok with wanking to images of kids... until you found out that... nah dude.
The question mark undermines that comment. Look, I understand that you have this dinny feud going on, what with having no personality, but the "Honest Injun, I didn't know that's what loli was for", that's retarded. Are you going to start a thread on Furry Gay Jew 96 about...I've never done that?
It really doesn't prove anything, but okay.Really, the question mark, that was a big mistake.
Dude, this is how retarded you are. You admit you've looked at erotic art of young girls? Right? You can go that far, yeah?It really doesn't prove anything, but okay.
Btw Pedofails, you just gave Lounge 96 a new member. I hope you will continue doing a terrific job at making OF a shithole.
It's because I posted his picture. He got caught trying to sext someone that at the time people thought was a minor on Kiwi Farms. It was later confirmed that the person was 18. He's very sensitive about it, despite it being public knowledge.
View attachment 76766
You're the one who's retarded, and are trying to gaslight me into thinking I wank it to lolicon.Dude, this is how retarded you are. You admit you've looked at erotic art of young girls? Right? You can go that far, yeah?
View attachment 76787
Look what pops up when you type the word lolicon into an internet search engine! You were looking at CP cartoons and not wanking, yeah. Oh, and you are a double retard, thinking that the burden of proof is important in anyway ON A NICHE INTERNET GOSSIP FORUM. Rumpole you ain't. Pole up your rump, yes.
Wait? Vingle tried to perv on the LooksMaxxxing troll?At this point I really should I seem to be in high demand
The response from the person he was sexually harassing is funny
View attachment 76788
Apparently the bloated Norwegian just wasn't his type
Gaslight? What kind of faggot are you? You have admitted to looking at sexualized images of girls (albeit cartoons). But you didn't wank. Also, yes, a lot of people know about the front covers of world famous rock bands. You looked at dirty cartoon pictures of children.You're the one who's retarded, and are trying to gaslight me into thinking I wank it to lolicon.
They admitted to looking at loli, but (in best Clinton voice) "He did not stroke to that anime" (does indignant head wobble).Wait? Vingle tried to perv on the LooksMaxxxing troll?
YesWait? Vingle tried to perv on the LooksMaxxxing troll?
No, I haven't. But it seems like you really want me to, based on how hard you are pushing this.You have admitted to looking at sexualized images of girls (albeit cartoons).
You did, not me.a lot of people know about the front covers of world famous rock bands. You looked at dirty cartoon pictures of children.
Yes you have, moron. You've literally admitted it on this thread. Remember "Oh, but I realized it was wrong, when INSERT SOPHISTRY HERE"? And you accuse me of gaslighting. Are you drinking cough syrup or something? Is it a Nordish thing.No, I haven't.
I know about the front covers, because I'm into a lot of music. You admitted you are into looking at sexualized cartoons of children. And running to Gay Furry Kike 96 to post selected caps, that isn't going to change the fact.You did, not me.
This person is a homosexual and thus feeds on negative attention, he's probably jacking off to your posts. xYes you have, moron. You've literally admitted it on this thread. Remember "Oh, but I realized it was wrong, when INSERT SOPHISTRY HERE"? And you accuse me of gaslighting. Are you drink cough syrup or something? Is it a Nordish thing.
I know about the front covers, because I'm into a lot of music. You admitted you are into looking at sexualized cartoons of children. And running to Gay Furry Kike 96 to post selected caps, that isn't going to change the fact.
Your probably not wrongThis person is a homosexual and thus feeds on negative attention, he's probably jacking off to your posts. x
You being delusional and interpreting it that way because of said delusion, is not me admitting to anything. It's fucking weird how you are trying to play bad cop and make me admit to something I didn't do.Yes you have, moron. You've literally admitted it on this thread. Remember "Oh, but I realized it was wrong, when INSERT SOPHISTRY HERE"? And you accuse me of gaslighting. Are you drinking cough syrup or something? Is it a Nordish thing.
I know about the front covers, because I'm into a lot of music. You admitted you are into looking at sexualized cartoons of children. And running to Gay Furry Kike 96 to post selected caps, that isn't going to change the fact.
It is hard to be the hero you need and don't deserve. I have already busted you in being a pedophile, and now you're throwing whatever to see what sticks.Your probably not wrong
Furry's like him crave attention even if it's negative
Y'know, this like crochet for me. Even if you are "only pretending", you got to keep your logic straight and true. And trust me, Vingle is "Only Pretending" to the max.This person is a homosexual and thus feeds on negative attention,
Certainly posting them to Gay Furry Kike 96. But like the loli they admitted to looking at... they didn't fap.he's probably jacking off to your posts. x
You being delusional and interpreting it that way because of said delusion,
At this point I really should I seem to be in high demand
The response from the person he was sexually harassing is funny
Apparently the bloated Norwegian just wasn't his type
Ah, you're arguing in bad faith. You would accuse me of being a lolicon regardless of what I answered. Gotcha.Y'know, this like crochet for me. Even if you are "only pretending", you got to keep your logic straight and true. And trust me, Vingle is "Only Pretending" to the max.
Certainly posting them to Gay Furry Kike 96. But like the loli they admitted to looking at... they didn't fap.
View attachment 76796
"I'm not the nonce who admitted to looking a loli, that you are looking for..."
Not going to work dude.
If you no longer hold the position of being pro-lolicon, then why support a content creator who is the most vocal defender of it on the internet?Ah, you're arguing in bad faith. You would accuse me of being a lolicon regardless of what I answered. Gotcha.