A proud, independent and vibrant splinter of the Kiwifarms community. All races, ethnicities, religions, gay/straight, CIS/trans, neurodiversity affirmative.

You don't need an inviation to join. You only need to have fun. If you can rock with us: You are one of us.

Please note: Positions or opinions on this forum expressed belong solely to the individual and don't necessarily reflect official stances by Onionfarms.
View all featured content

Find member

KF Gossip 🗣️🦻🏼 KF General 2.0 / Green reddit / catboy ranch 2 Neko shota boogalo / cwcki forums autistic evolution

These threads cover general gossip and interacting with Kiwifarms (openly calling them out).
Subtitle
General Discussion: users, bad takes, jannys, Null, etc
nobodyworthwhile said:
You literally just called it bad that a Kiwi criticizes Kiwi Farms
Click to expand...
Show me where exactly I said that in my post? Because all I did was show a screenshot of a thread he made that had Josh's note on it.
nobodyworthwhile said:
"People who aren't gonna conform should keep their head down."
Click to expand...
Except that's not what I said at all. Do you know how many people make new posts regarding things that already have a post about it? This is most common in the actual articles thread of A&H. Skykiii is just the more obvious one doing it everywhere else on the site.

You're being awfully histrionic about my post to the point where it comes off as defensive.
 
Celebrate Nite said:
Show me where exactly I said that in my post? Because all I did was show a screenshot of a thread he made that had Josh's note on it.
Click to expand...
Dude.

The thread you showed was one where guy criticizes Kiwi Farms. You otherwise presented no context for why this deserves the descriptor of "autist" or "going rogue" or intimations that its being done "just for his own amusement."

As presented, yes most people in the English-speaking world would think you're saying he's bad because he criticized KF.

If I showed a picture of a man holding a puppy, and said "this guy is stupid," and gave no other context or information, most people would assume I don't like puppies. After all, what else are they supposed to think if I don't tell them anything more?

Celebrate Nite said:
Except that's not what I said at all.
Click to expand...
If you don't see how that can be an obvious inference to saying things like "complainers should stick to designated general threads" in a world where most of us saw this bullshit from school teachers, law enforcement, political talking heads (9:53 if the timestamp doesn't work), and forum and reddit mods, terrible bosses.... then that's a you problem, buddy.

Celebrate Nite said:
Do you know how many people make new posts regarding things that already have a post about it?
Click to expand...
There was not an existing "KF isn't as good as it used to be" topic.

Celebrate Nite said:
This is most common in the actual articles thread of A&H.
Click to expand...
Dude, I can't read your mind, I have no idea what thread you're talking about.

Maybe provide a link? Burden of proof is on you to prove other "bitch about KF" threads existed, after all.

Though this still goes back to my earlier statement that you're basically saying criticism of KF should be ghetto'd into a designated thread where it can be filed away and ignored and not placed somewhere where it might possibly get a reaction and rock the boat.

Celebrate Nite said:
You're being awfully histrionic about my post to the point where it comes off as defensive.
Click to expand...
You do realize why I'm being defensive, right?

I believe IKOL has figured it out.
 
A new user gets banned, someone asks in the Multipass thread in Supporters why they were banned, got the response of being a "sock".
1759491075365.png
Someone prods a bit further and gets some very interesting information:
1759491087516.png
"I don't know; Null was the one who banned them."

Sounds to me like Null sets the ban reason as "sock" without elaborating further.
Sounds just like the excuse of "community infighting" he uses when he wants someone banned but doesn't have a real reason to ban them.
At least this is indirect confirmation straight from the jannies that Null just bans people for socking without checking any further to see if they really are a sock, or if his clitty is leaking and just wants people gone without a valid reason.
And Null wonders why his site hasn't grown since #DropKiwiFarms. Only a genuinely retarded person wouldn't be able to figure out why by now.
 
vlcmediaplayer said:
A new user gets banned, someone asks in the Multipass thread in Supporters why they were banned, got the response of being a "sock".
View attachment 100696
Someone prods a bit further and gets some very interesting information:
View attachment 100697
"I don't know; Null was the one who banned them."

Sounds to me like Null sets the ban reason as "sock" without elaborating further.
Sounds just like the excuse of "community infighting" he uses when he wants someone banned but doesn't have a real reason to ban them.
At least this is indirect confirmation straight from the jannies that Null just bans people for socking without checking any further to see if they really are a sock, or if his clitty is leaking and just wants people gone without a valid reason.
And Null wonders why his site hasn't grown since #DropKiwiFarms. Only a genuinely retarded person wouldn't be able to figure out why by now.
Click to expand...
:shronk:

With how Null runs his site. The fact he could ban anyone without telling the mods why is pretty telling.
 
vlcmediaplayer said:
A new user gets banned, someone asks in the Multipass thread in Supporters why they were banned, got the response of being a "sock".
View attachment 100696
Someone prods a bit further and gets some very interesting information:
View attachment 100697
"I don't know; Null was the one who banned them."

Sounds to me like Null sets the ban reason as "sock" without elaborating further.
Sounds just like the excuse of "community infighting" he uses when he wants someone banned but doesn't have a real reason to ban them.
At least this is indirect confirmation straight from the jannies that Null just bans people for socking without checking any further to see if they really are a sock, or if his clitty is leaking and just wants people gone without a valid reason.
And Null wonders why his site hasn't grown since #DropKiwiFarms. Only a genuinely retarded person wouldn't be able to figure out why by now.
Click to expand...
To be fair it can be safe to assume damn near 95% of new accounts are socks. At this point Null might as well set kiwifarms as invite only if he wants it to be his green reddit cult.
 
I'm trying to figure out what sparked the anti-porn movement everyone suddenly had there. I initially thought it was because of the tranny menace and troons themselves usually surrounding and associating themselves with porn, which I'd get. But reading more and more about him trying to score Lidl drip it's probably because of something else. And it has become to the point of the other extreme end, the opposite of how Reddit and 4chan handles porn.
 
Fulgur Manifestation said:
I'm trying to figure out what sparked the anti-porn movement everyone suddenly had there. I initially thought it was because of the tranny menace and troons themselves usually surrounding and associating themselves with porn, which I'd get. But reading more and more about him trying to score Lidl drip it's probably because of something else. And it has become to the point of the other extreme end, the opposite of how Reddit and 4chan handles porn.
Click to expand...
What's going on over there? If it's a female brained anti porn movement then it's just pearl clutching puritanism.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Bear Hammer
Holding Grudges: A Case Study Of The KF Alex Hogendorp Thread And Why Some People Would Rather Die Than Give Me Credit For Anything
2
Replies
27
Views
2K
Gore San
Gore San
Back
Top Bottom