A proud, independent and vibrant splinter of the Kiwifarms community. All races, ethnicities, religions, gay/straight, CIS/trans, neurodiversity affirmative.

You don't need an inviation to join. You only need to have fun. If you can rock with us: You are one of us.

Please note: Positions or opinions on this forum expressed belong solely to the individual and don't necessarily reflect official stances by Onionfarms.

Find member

KF Gossip 🗣️🦻🏼 KF General 2.0 / Green reddit / catboy ranch 2 Neko shota boogalo / cwcki forums autistic evolution

These threads cover general gossip and interacting with Kiwifarms (openly calling them out).
Subtitle
General Discussion: users, bad takes, jannys, Null, etc
here you go
shronion.png
shronion.png
shronion.png
shronion.png
shronion.png

1755967667832.png
1755967667832.png
1755967667832.png
1755967667832.png
1755967667832.png

1755967816520.png
1755967816520.png
1755967816520.png
1755967816520.png
1755967816520.png
 
We don't send people to weinerville because they say stupid things.

Well how about next time when you're in the discord with us and I explain a 24-hour ban AT LENGTH, you say something before the 24 hours is over?

You had the power of the entire time to unban Ishtar. It seems to me like you let me go ahead with the ban, and because it wasn't popular you're going to pretend like you're mad at me over it now that the ban is over.

You knew I banned Ishtar. You did nothing. You said nothing. You let the ban wrap up. And now you're pretending like you're upset that she got banned.

This was not something that went over your head and under your nose. I gave you the Iggy about this the second I did it. I told you here and I told you in one of our DMs. Don't tell me you didn't check either of those alerts.

1000004720.png


1000004723.png


You knew on discord and you knew on here. Look at where I told you on staff chats right after I banned her. Literally the next response is you.

@Ishtar I was reactionary and I apologize and I will loosen up on the moderation style, and next time I'll make it more clear if I'm trying to get you to steer away from a subject or if I'm trying to just win an argument. Because it wasn't about me proving myself right I was trying to get you to stop and you wouldn't stop. There's a lot of scrutiny right now and there's a lot of scrutiny on the horizon, so we need to stay away from topics like that unless it's an obvious joke.

And to everybody I'm sorry about being such a tight ass. My apologies about the Ishtar ban, I was wrong on that one and I'm an adult enough to admit that I fucked up.
 
Last edited:
Because that's who they are, boomers who got kicked out of the Trump reddit clone for saying N.

Well, not everyone agrees. I have to defend Freya here, she's right, it's not a universal age limit. Not in the US, and only four countries in Europe have an age of consent higher than 16. You can shit on Destiny and Warski for grooming teens especially when it's illegal in the states they reside in but not every 21 year old that hooks up/marries a 16 or 17 year old is a pedo, and equating it to sexual abuse of pre-pubescent literal children is a bridge too far.

Don't justify a ban saying its illegal conduct when its not in most places.
First off:
"Federal law mandates that individuals must be at least 18 to consent to sexual activity if the activity involves interstate travel or online communication with a minor. This means that even if a state's age of consent is lower than 18, the federal standard will apply in specific cases."

Federal law overrides state law. I don't give a shit what places are late to the party of making the age of consent 18, because what is legal isn't always moral and what is moral isn't always legal. If an adult crosses state or country lines to meet a 16 year old for sex that is still a sex crime and it is sex trafficking to take a minor to a place where it is legal to fuck them for a reason. And let's not act like that is meant to allow 40 year olds to fuck 16 year olds because it's clearly meant to be for the Romeo and Juliet laws. This is not the hill to die on and it's off topic. Advocating for doing both illegal and morally reprehensible shit is ban worthy.
 
Reason: It used to be illegal to hide Jews and help runaway slaves escape so the law doesn't dictate morals in every instance. Piracy is illegal but based.
Last edited:
Well how about next time when you're in the discord with us and I explain a 24-hour ban AT LENGTH, you say something before the 24 hours is over?

You had the power of the entire time to unban Ishtar. It seems to me like you let me go ahead with the ban, and because it wasn't popular you're going to pretend like you're mad at me over it now that the ban is over.

You knew I banned Ishtar. You did nothing. You said nothing. You let the ban wrap up. And now you're pretending like you're upset that she got banned.

This was not something that went over your head and under your nose. I gave you the Iggy about this the second I did it. I told you here and I told you in one of our DMs. Don't tell me you didn't check either of those alerts.

View attachment 98594

View attachment 98596

You knew on discord and you knew on here. Look at where I told you on staff chats right after I banned her. Literally the next response is you.

@Ishtar I was reactionary and I apologize and I will loosen up on the moderation style, and next time I'll make it more clear if I'm trying to get you to steer away from a subject or if I'm trying to just win an argument. Because it wasn't about me proving myself right I was trying to get you to stop and you wouldn't stop. There's a lot of scrutiny right now and there's a lot of scrutiny on the horizon, so we need to stay away from topics like that unless it's an obvious joke.

And to everybody I'm sorry about being such a tight ass. My apologies about the Ishtar ban, I was wrong on that one and I'm an adult enough to admit that I fucked up.
I was in the wrong as well. I posted this while I was drinking my coffee at Honeydew Donuts. And it is only fitting that I apologize to you and others as well. I know you are trying to do your job and it is especially hard in these gray areas as well.
 
Ok I’m not getting this Destiny thing. So Destiny sexts a 16 yr old, bad
But Andy sexts a 17 yr old, good? It’s a one year difference, how come Destiny is weird but Warski is fine, where’s the consistency? Destiny gets a community feature but Warski dosent
Warski is part of Kino Casino, which is funded by An Open Secret producer and hedge fund manager Gabe Hoffman. Hoffman also likely finances MATI and Kiwifarms.

If Null starts going after Warski, he'll piss off Hoffman and possibly get cut off from his tugboat.
 
First off:
"Federal law mandates that individuals must be at least 18 to consent to sexual activity if the activity involves interstate travel or online communication with a minor. This means that even if a state's age of consent is lower than 18, the federal standard will apply in specific cases."

Federal law overrides state law. I don't give a shit what places are late to the party of making the age of consent 18, because what is legal isn't always moral and what is moral isn't always legal. If an adult crosses state or country lines to meet a 16 year old for sex that is still a sex crime and it is sex trafficking to take a minor to a place where it is legal to fuck them for a reason. And let's not act like that is meant to allow 40 year olds to fuck 16 year olds because it's clearly meant to be for the Romeo and Juliet laws. This is not the hill to die on and it's off topic. Advocating for doing both illegal and morally reprehensible shit is ban worthy.
We are not advocating anything illegal. We are not actively conspiring to allow 40 year olds to cross state lines to fuck a 16 year old. We are not rewriting legal codes for the feds or the state. It is a discussion board. If someone on their off-time decides they want to cross state lines and fuck a 16 year old and are caught, it's their problem, not ours.
 
We are not advocating anything illegal. We are not actively conspiring to allow 40 year olds to cross state lines to fuck a 16 year old. We are not rewriting legal codes for the feds or the state. It is a discussion board. If someone on their off-time decides they want to cross state lines and fuck a 16 year old and are caught, it's their problem, not ours.
You weren't but another user was which is why they got banned for a day.
 
Well how about next time when you're in the discord with us and I explain a 24-hour ban AT LENGTH, you say something before the 24 hours is over?

You had the power of the entire time to unban Ishtar. It seems to me like you let me go ahead with the ban, and because it wasn't popular you're going to pretend like you're mad at me over it now that the ban is over.

You knew I banned Ishtar. You did nothing. You said nothing. You let the ban wrap up. And now you're pretending like you're upset that she got banned.

This was not something that went over your head and under your nose. I gave you the Iggy about this the second I did it. I told you here and I told you in one of our DMs. Don't tell me you didn't check either of those alerts.

View attachment 98594

View attachment 98596

You knew on discord and you knew on here. Look at where I told you on staff chats right after I banned her. Literally the next response is you.

@Ishtar I was reactionary and I apologize and I will loosen up on the moderation style, and next time I'll make it more clear if I'm trying to get you to steer away from a subject or if I'm trying to just win an argument. Because it wasn't about me proving myself right I was trying to get you to stop and you wouldn't stop. There's a lot of scrutiny right now and there's a lot of scrutiny on the horizon, so we need to stay away from topics like that unless it's an obvious joke.

And to everybody I'm sorry about being such a tight ass. My apologies about the Ishtar ban, I was wrong on that one and I'm an adult enough to admit that I fucked up.
You have a point. Yours truly can be just as much of a dumbass as anyone else. And I have to admit it's probably true more often than I would care to admit. My apologies here as well.
 
First off:
"Federal law mandates that individuals must be at least 18 to consent to sexual activity if the activity involves interstate travel or online communication with a minor. This means that even if a state's age of consent is lower than 18, the federal standard will apply in specific cases."

Federal law overrides state law. I don't give a shit what places are late to the party of making the age of consent 18, because what is legal isn't always moral and what is moral isn't always legal. If an adult crosses state or country lines to meet a 16 year old for sex that is still a sex crime and it is sex trafficking to take a minor to a place where it is legal to fuck them for a reason. And let's not act like that is meant to allow 40 year olds to fuck 16 year olds because it's clearly meant to be for the Romeo and Juliet laws. This is not the hill to die on and it's off topic. Advocating for doing both illegal and morally reprehensible shit is ban worthy.

Smokey and the bandit voice: GOT A BROAD IN THE CAR, TOOK HER ACROSS THE STATE LINE, AND THAT'S THE MANN ACT!


BANK ROBBIN IS BABY SHIT ALONGSIDE WHAT THIS DUDE'S DOIN!!!
 
Reason: Oh damn I just looked it up in the mann act is still in effect
Smokey and the bandit voice: GOT A BROAD IN THE CAR, TOOK HER ACROSS THE STATE LINE, AND THAT'S THE MANN ACT!


BANK ROBBIN IS BABY SHIT ALONGSIDE WHAT THIS DUDE'S DOIN!!!
I don't know about that. Bank robbery is pretty serious business.

A penalty for a Mann Act violation, also known as the "White Slavery Act," can result in a maximum of 10 years in federal prison and a fine for transporting adults across state lines for illegal sexual activity. Penalties are significantly harsher when the offense involves a minor (under 18), potentially including mandatory minimum sentences. In addition to imprisonment and fines, a conviction can lead to other consequences like asset forfeiture and mandatory sex offender registration.
The typical penalty for a federal bank robbery ranges from several years in prison to life imprisonment or even the death penalty, depending on the circumstances. Because most banks and credit unions are federally insured, robbery of these institutions is usually prosecuted as a federal crime under 18 U.S.C. § 2113. The severity of the punishment depends on the level of force used and the harm caused.
 
Smokey and the bandit voice: GOT A BROAD IN THE CAR, TOOK HER ACROSS THE STATE LINE, AND THAT'S THE MANN ACT!


BANK ROBBIN IS BABY SHIT ALONGSIDE WHAT THIS DUDE'S DOIN!!!
Using the same logic that they are using to defend middle aged men fucking 16 year olds you could easily make the argument the age of consent is 11 in Nigeria so letting Africans post jailbait photos isn't a crime.
 
Reason: Imagine haggling about the age of consent like trying to get a deal on something at hobby lobby. How well do you think that will go over if they were catfished by the police or Ruben Sim or something.
Back
Top