Reminds me of the YouTuber E;R’s take on The Last Jedi.
I actually kind of like that movie.
honestly i feel if it wasn't a star wars movie but a star wars parody it would have done a lot better. the whole "subvert expectations" and the way the plotting is, is fucking ripe for a modern space comedy. Like there's some alternate timeline where Rian is told to fuck off when he pitched to disney and instead JJ Abrams does the whole trilogy himself and Rian gets A24 to fund a hilariously cheap looking film called "space battles" which becomes a hit, the same way looper or Brick or most of Rian Johnson's other films are both well liked and profitable.
Its like how the 2000s Battlestar galatica is just a massive middle finger to Star Trek Voyager and includes all the ideas Ron Moore wasn't allowed to use on that show. If they allowed him to do what he wanted Voyager would be seen in an even worse light than it is.
I also love the implication that seeing a sexy woman would make you want to troon out (let's push the fact that it is an extremely pixelated NES image aside for a moment). Yet more bizarre anti-sexuality that is so typical of KF and Null followers.
its such a crazy thing too because i remember during the comicsgate era of the farms they weren't too anti-sex. Like Andy Warski got away with showing CP in 2019 for a fucking reason. even the redo of healer stuff Nick Rekieta was on about would have caused the farms to turn on him if they were as anti-sex back in 2019. even flamenco pre-lolicon stuff was allowed to admit to being a full on weeb loving everything short of lolicon. i feel a lot of the current anti-sex stuff has to do a lot more with the TERFs and BP being allowed to fuck over a lot of power users the last couple years.
It reminds me a lot of reddit nowadays vs 2014 when you had stolen nudes and racism making up most of the front page.
It's really laughably retarded to apply modern standards to things of the past, especially when you were never around to experience the past or when you don't understand the context of what things were like at the time to make a fair judgement.
not only is it a sign of low iq its a sign of a low quality mind. someone who doesn't care about the history or legacy of their own family or culture and just consumes basic goyslop.
a great example is this one song from 2006 from some feminist called "Sex Changes", like despite the title and a few jokey lines its rather obviously about a woman having an abortion after losing her virginity. Obviously a decade plus afterwards people are accusing it of being a transphobic song but trannies were such a niche issue in the mid-2000s that even the gays weren't really talking about them even in their own studies and media. They were still seen as freaks on par with conjoined twins, beyond that the mid-2000s were the height of the evangelical christians power and their views on womens rights lead to so many feminsts publishing similar stuff about sex and pregnancy and stuff like that, Juno came from that same trend. Like if you were alive at the time or anytime after it would be near impossible to not understand what the song is talking about; but because zoomers and trannies and other vile groups can't think beyond themselves (a huge sign of autism which is co-morbid with troons) they assume a song from some dyke who didn't even have a computer clearly was writing about them.
The equivalent would be someone now releasing a song called "orange man bad" and people a decade from now assuming its a pro-racism song. like you have to be fucking insane to try that argument